  | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
   
    | • | 
    A
    “complementary” prior is defined 
     | 
   
   
     | 
    as one that
    exactly cancels the 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
    correlations
    created by explaining 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
    away. So the
    posterior factors. 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
   
   
     | 
    – | 
    Under
    what conditions do 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
    complementary
    priors exist? 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
   
   
     | 
    – | 
    Complementary
    priors do not 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
    exist
    in general: 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
   
   
     | 
    • | 
     Parameter counting shows that 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
    complementary
    priors cannot exist 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
    if the
    relationship between the 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
    hidden
    variables and the data is 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
    defined
    by a separate conditional 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
    probability
    table for each hidden 
     | 
     | 
   
   
     | 
    configuration. 
     | 
     |