 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
• |
A
“complementary” prior is defined
|
|
as one that
exactly cancels the
|
|
|
correlations
created by explaining
|
|
|
away. So the
posterior factors.
|
|
|
|
– |
Under
what conditions do
|
|
|
complementary
priors exist?
|
|
|
|
– |
Complementary
priors do not
|
|
|
exist
in general:
|
|
|
|
• |
Parameter counting shows that
|
|
|
complementary
priors cannot exist
|
|
|
if the
relationship between the
|
|
|
hidden
variables and the data is
|
|
|
defined
by a separate conditional
|
|
|
probability
table for each hidden
|
|
|
configuration.
|
|