Marking Scheme:

General idea:
Part marks should be given for accomplishing each part of the task


Penalties:
==========
-16 points for not using LaTeX 
-8 points for not submitting the tex file

Part 0 (Total: 2)
====================
2 points for any sensible report with at least one image

Part 1 -- Report (Total: 18)
============================
4 points for artefacts (e.g., colours somewhat not natural, artefacts at the borders etc. Misalignment is not really an artefact -- give at most 1 point for that)
2 points for illustrating the artefact
8 points for a clear comparison of SSD/NCC/etc ("X seems to work better than Y" without elaboration gets 4)
4 points for illustrating the comparison with at least one example

Part 1 -- Code (Total: 45)
=================================
(If everything seems to work, except for the last item, there's no need to look in too much detail. This is mostly here for people with bad reports/most things not working)
10 pts for computing SSD
10 pts for computing cross-correlation
10 pts for iterating through displacements
10 pts for combining channels
5 pts for padding the channels with black pixels when comparing using SSD. (This is only find if using un-normalized cross-correlation)

Part 2 -- Report (Total: 12 points)
====================================


2 points for displaying results
2 points for displaying zoomed-in version of results (also give 2 point above for this)
2 points for some kind of report
6 points for a good quantitative report (also give 2 point above for this)

Part 2 -- Code (Total: 23 points)
=====================================
8 points for matching resized images
15 points for using the output for the coarse scale to match on a fine scale