| Mark | What you did |
|---|
| 5 | Reason, apply, problem solve, present:
Correctly applies ideas to reach a clear, concise, correct, cleanly presented solution. Can reason
about ideas presented. Can apply them to different settings. etc. Minor technical flaws allowed.
Your explanations/documentation is clear and simple, gets to the point, presents the right few
concepts necessary to understand the solution.
|
| 4 | As in 5 but lacks some clarity, not as concise as possible, some minor flaw, not a clean presentation.
Documentation/explanation is not focused, does not address key points
in any special way.
|
| 3 |
Semantics: Demonstrates correct understanding of basic definitions, ability to correctly apply basic techniques,
theorem statements etc. Some major conceptual misunderstanding. Indicators are that fixing the problem would require a long discussion.
|
| 2 | Some major flaw in the understanding of basic definitions, techniques, theorem statements.
Examples are: Applies theorems to wrong settings.
Does not understand the goal (ie tries to prove the wrong result).
Solves the wrong problem.
|
| 1 | Syntax: Ability to restate given definitions, theorems, techniques. |