@COMMENT This file was generated by bib2html.pl <https://sourceforge.net/projects/bib2html/> version 0.94
@COMMENT written by Patrick Riley <http://sourceforge.net/users/patstg/>
@COMMENT This file came from Kuldeep S. Meel's publication pages at
@COMMENT http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~meel/publications/
@inproceedings{GBM21,
title={Justicia: A Stochastic SAT Approach to Formally Verify Fairness},
author={  Ghosh, Bishwamittra and Basu, Debabrota and Meel, Kuldeep S.},
booktitle=AAAI,
month=feb,
year={2021},
bib2html_rescat={Formal Methods 4 ML},	
bib2html_pubtype = {Refereed Conference},
bib2html_dl_pdf={../Papers/aaai21-gbm.pdf},
abstract={As a technology ML is oblivious to societal good or bad,
and thus, the field of fair machine learning has stepped up to
propose multiple mathematical definitions, algorithms, and
systems to ensure different notions of fairness in ML applications.
Given the multitude of propositions, it has become
imperative to formally verify the fairness metrics satisfied by
different algorithms on different datasets. In this paper, we
propose a stochastic satisfiability (SSAT) framework, Justicia,
that formally verifies different fairness measures of supervised
learning algorithms with respect to the underlying data distribution.
We instantiate Justicia on multiple classification and
bias mitigation algorithms, and datasets to verify different fairness
metrics, such as disparate impact, statistical parity, and
equalized odds. Justicia is scalable, accurate, and operates on
non-Boolean and compound sensitive attributes unlike existing
distribution-based verifiers, such as FairSquare and VeriFair.
Being distribution-based by design, Justicia is more robust
than the verifiers, such as AIF360, that operate on specific test
samples. We also theoretically bound the finite-sample error
of the verified fairness measure.},
}