The assignment will be marked using various categories.
Each category will be assigned a mark from 0 to 4 as
detailed in the table below.
It is allowed to give ½ marks for close calls.
| 0 | Entirely absent, or there but essentially worthless. |
| 1 | Almost got the point, done very poorly. |
| 2 | A reasonable try, but lacking in some significant manner. |
| 3 | An overall good job but lacking in some minor details. |
| 4 | Done very well |
| weight | category |
|---|---|
| 1 | Map diagram and explanations |
| 3 | XML DTD (how well DTD captures the XML app., not how well designed is the XML app unless utterly trivial in design, in which case you marks are given only for what knowledge of DTDs is displayed) |
| 3 | Documentation of XML application in DTD |
| 3 | XML example file (includes appropriateness of design of XML application) |
| 3 | XSLT script inspection (usage of XSLT plus comments + style) |
| 2 | HTML usage (includes comments and style) |
| 2 | CSS usage (includes comments and style) (if usage is trivial, marks will be given only for what knowledge is displayed) |
| 3 | XSLT script execution (runtime) |
| 5 | Web site overall impression (runtime) |
| 25 | × 4 = 100% |