-- Table structure for table `parallelVenues`
--

CREATE TABLE `parallelVenues` (
  `ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `name` text,
  `type` varchar(45) DEFAULT NULL,
  `year` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `parallelVenues`
--

INSERT INTO `parallelVenues` VALUES (5140,'WER','proceedings',2010),(5141,'WER','proceedings',2011),(5142,'WER','proceedings',2011),(5143,'Americas Conference on Information Systems , AMCIS','proceedings',2009),(5144,'Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE','proceedings',2005),(5145,'AMCIS','proceedings',2010),(5146,'International Conference on Systems Engineering','proceedings',2007),(5147,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Data Engineering, SEDE','proceedings',2008),(5148,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2005),(5149,'Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE','proceedings',2009),(5150,'Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems, WITS','proceedings',2009),(5151,'International ELeGI Conference on Advanced Technology for Enhanced Learning','proceedings',2005),(5152,'IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA','proceedings',2007),(5153,'Managing Requirements Knowledge, MARK International Workshop on','proceedings',2008),(5154,'Computer and Information Sciences, ISCIS International Symposium on','proceedings',2008),(5155,'Software Product Management, IWSPM International Workshop on','proceedings',2008),(5156,'Multimedia and Enjoyable Requirements EngineeringBeyond Mere Descriptions and with More Fun and Games, MERE International Workshop on','proceedings',2008),(5157,'Cybernetic Intelligent Systems, CIS IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2008),(5158,'IEEE Signal Processing, Communication and Applications Conference, SIU','proceedings',2008),(5159,'ServiceOriented Computing: Consequences for Engineering Requirements, SOCCER International Workshop on','proceedings',2008),(5160,'Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), International Workshop on','proceedings',2009),(5161,'ICSE Companion','proceedings',2009),(5162,'Software Product Management (IWSPM), International Workshop on','proceedings',2009),(5163,'IEEE International Advance Computing Conference, IACC','proceedings',2009),(5164,'Requirements@ Run Time (RE@ RunTime), International Workshop on','proceedings',2010),(5165,'Web and Requirements Engineering (WeRE), International Workshop on the','proceedings',2010),(5166,'Industrial and Information Systems (IIS), International Conference on','proceedings',2010),(5167,'International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science RCIS','proceedings',2010),(5168,'Human Interface and the Management of Information Interacting with Information','proceedings',2010),(5169,'Requirements Engineering for Social Computing (RESC), International Workshop on','proceedings',2011),(5170,'Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT), XXIII International Symposium on','proceedings',2011),(5171,'IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering','proceedings',2011),(5172,'Intelligent Systems and Applications (ISA), International Workshop on','proceedings',2011),(5173,'Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), International Workshop on','proceedings',2011),(5174,'Emerging Technologies (ICET), International Conference on','proceedings',2011),(5175,'of International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies','proceedings',2011),(5176,'Computer Science and Service System (CSSS), International Conference on','proceedings',2011),(5177,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2012),(5178,'ModelDriven Requirements Engineering Workshop (MoDRE), IEEE','proceedings',2012),(5179,'Requirements Patterns (RePa), IEEE International Workshop on','proceedings',2012),(5180,'Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), International Workshop on','proceedings',2012),(5181,'System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), International Conference','proceedings',2013),(5182,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2013),(5183,'Comparing Requirements Modeling Approaches Workshop (CMA@ RE), International','proceedings',2013),(5184,'International Workshop on Games and Software Engineering: Engineering Computer Games to Enable Positive, Progressive Change','proceedings',2013),(5185,'ModelDriven Requirements Engineering (MoDRE), International Workshop on','proceedings',2013),(5186,'International Workshop on the Twin Peaks of Requirements and Architecture, TwinPeaks','proceedings',2013),(5187,'Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), International Workshop on','proceedings',2013),(5188,'Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2014),(5189,'Artificial Intelligence for Requirements Engineering (AIRE), IEEE International Workshop on','proceedings',2014),(5190,'Interrelations between Requirements Engineering and Business Process Management (REBPM), IEEE International Workshop on the','proceedings',2014),(5191,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2014),(5192,'ModelDriven Requirements Engineering Workshop (MoDRE), IEEE International','proceedings',2014),(5193,'Requirements Prioritization and Communication (RePriCo), IEEE International Workshop on','proceedings',2014),(5194,'Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), IEEE/ACIS International Conference on','proceedings',2014),(5195,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2008),(5196,'Software Engineering and Data Mining (SEDM), International Conference on','proceedings',2010),(5197,'Requirements Engineering Visualization, REV International Workshop on','proceedings',2007),(5198,'Informatica (CLEI), XXXVIII Conferencia Latinoamericana En','proceedings',2012),(5199,'International Workshop on Software Engineering Challenges for the Smart Grid','proceedings',2014),(5200,'workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games (PCG ), Raleigh, NC, USA','proceedings',2012),(5201,'Digital Society, ICDS International Conference on','proceedings',2010),(5202,'Software Engineering Advances, ICSEA International Conference on','proceedings',2009),(5203,'International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering','proceedings',2014),(5204,'Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA), ACIS International Conference on','proceedings',2010),(5205,'Information and Telecommunication Technologies (APSITT), AsiaPacific Symposium on','proceedings',2010),(5206,'European Conference on eLearning (ECEL )','proceedings',2009),(5207,'ComputerAided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design, CAID/CD International Conference on','proceedings',2008),(5208,'International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and SelfManaging Systems','proceedings',2014),(5209,'ACIS','proceedings',2008),(5210,'international conference on Software engineering and knowledge engineering','proceedings',2002),(5211,'symposia on Metainformatics','proceedings',2005),(5212,'AOSD workshop on Early aspects','proceedings',2008),(5213,'proceedings of the Canadian conference on computer science and software engineering','proceedings',2009),(5214,'International Conference on Semantic Systems','proceedings',2010),(5215,'International Workshop on Variability Modeling of SoftwareIntensive Systems','proceedings',2012),(5216,'International C* Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering','proceedings',2013),(5217,'International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments','proceedings',2014),(5218,'ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP)','journal',2009),(5219,'ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS)','journal',2007),(5220,'ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC)','journal',2004),(5221,'Computer SecurityESORICS','proceedings',2010),(5222,'ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology','journal',2001),(5223,'XXIXeme Congres INFORSID','proceedings',2011),(5224,'XXXIIIeme Congres INFORSID','proceedings',2015),(5225,'Advanced Science Letters','journal',2012),(5226,'Advances in Information Sciences \\& Service Sciences','journal',2011),(5227,'of International Conference on Advances in Computing','proceedings',2013),(5228,'Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications','proceedings',2015),(5229,'Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing','proceedings',2016),(5230,'WER','proceedings',2013),(5231,'Applied clinical informatics','journal',2013),(5232,'Applied Ontology','proceedings',2015),(5233,'Availability, Reliability and Security, ARES International Conference on','proceedings',2008),(5234,'ACM/IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering','proceedings',2014),(5235,'IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering','proceedings',2009),(5236,'AspectOriented Requirements Engineering','bookChapter',2013),(5237,'international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility','proceedings',2010),(5238,'AMCIS','proceedings',2006),(5239,'AtAutomatisierungstechnik','journal',2013),(5240,'Automated Software Engineering','journal',2002),(5241,'Automated Software Engineering','journal',2008),(5242,'Automated Software Engineering','proceedings',2009),(5243,'Autonomous Robots','proceedings',2007),(5244,'AUTOTESTCON','proceedings',2007),(5245,'International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design, BMSD','proceedings',2011),(5246,'Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering','proceedings',2005),(5247,'Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering','proceedings',2008),(5248,'EMMSAD','proceedings',2005),(5249,'CAiSE (Doctoral Consortium)','proceedings',2006),(5250,'iStar','proceedings',2008),(5251,'CEUR Workshop','proceedings',2009),(5252,'Information Systems Evolution','proceedings',2010),(5253,'CAiSE (Doctoral Consortium)','proceedings',2011),(5254,'PoEM , Rostock, Germany, November ,','proceedings',2012),(5255,'International i* Workshop Valencia, Spain, June ,','proceedings',2013),(5256,'CIISE','proceedings',2014),(5257,'International i* Workshop (, to be published)','proceedings',2015),(5258,'XIII Conferencia Iberoamericana en Software Engineering, CibSE','proceedings',2010),(5259,'WER','proceedings',2013),(5260,'CIBSE XVIII IberoAmerican Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2015),(5261,'Aligning Enterprise, System and Software Architectures','bookChapter',2014),(5262,'Communications in Computer and Information Science','journal',2014),(5263,'Contemporary Computing','proceedings',2010),(5264,'Computer Networks and Information Technologies','proceedings',2011),(5265,'Computer Applications for Software Engineering, Disaster Recovery, and Business Continuity','proceedings',2012),(5266,'Communications in Computer and Information Science','proceedings',2013),(5267,'Requirements Engineering','proceedings',2014),(5268,'Trustworthy Computing and Services','proceedings',2015),(5269,'Communications of the ACM','journal',1999),(5270,'Computational and Robotic Models of the Hierarchical Organization of Behavior','bookChapter',2013),(5271,'Computational Mechanics','journal',2014),(5272,'Computer','journal',1996),(5273,'Computer','journal',2013),(5274,'Computer and Information Sciences II','proceedings',2012),(5275,'Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering','journal',2016),(5276,'Computer Networks','proceedings',2003),(5277,'Computer Science Research and Development','proceedings',2013),(5278,'Computer Software','journal',2012),(5279,'Computer Standards \\& Interfaces','journal',2015),(5280,'Computer Standards \\& Interfaces','proceedings',2011),(5281,'International Journal of Computer Systems Science \\& Engineering','journal',2006),(5282,'Computer Standards \\& Interfaces','proceedings',1997),(5283,'IEEE Games, Media, Entertainment Conference, IEEE GEM','proceedings',2015),(5284,'Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2009),(5285,'IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics','proceedings',2011),(5286,'annual workshop on Cyber security and information intelligence research: developing strategies to meet the cyber security and information intelligence challenges ahead','proceedings',2008),(5287,'Decision Support Systems','journal',2008),(5288,'DMS','proceedings',2010),(5289,'Generation Data Mining: Towards ServiceOriented Knowledge Discovery (SoKD’)','proceedings',2009),(5290,'Electronic Commerce Research','journal',2009),(5291,'Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science','journal',2007),(5292,'Formal Methods in System Design','proceedings',2005),(5293,'arXiv preprint arXiv:','proceedings',2014),(5294,'Empirical Software Engineering','journal',2014),(5295,'Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering','proceedings',2011),(5296,'Engineering and Managing Software Requirements','Book',2005),(5297,'Engineering and Managing Software Requirements','bookChapter',2005),(5298,'Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence','journal',2001),(5299,'Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence','journal',2005),(5300,'Enterprise Information Systems','journal',2011),(5301,'Expert Systems with Applications','journal',2009),(5302,'Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems X','proceedings',2009),(5303,'Requirements Engineering Visualization, REV International Workshop on','proceedings',2007),(5304,'Formal aspects of computing','proceedings',2010),(5305,'Formal Methods in System Design','proceedings',2007),(5306,'Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, CERE International Workshop on','proceedings',2006),(5307,'Frameworks for Developing Efficient Information Systems: Models, Theory, and Practice: Models, Theory, and Practice','bookChapter',2013),(5308,'conference on KnowledgeBased Software Engineering: Joint Conference on KnowledgeBased Software Engineering','proceedings',2008),(5309,'JCKBSE','proceedings',2012),(5310,'Green in Software Engineering','bookChapter',2015),(5311,'IASTED International MultiConference on Applied Informatics','proceedings',2003),(5312,'ICK KDIR International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval and KMIS International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing, Proc','proceedings',2013),(5313,'Audio Language and Image Processing (ICALIP), International Conference on','proceedings',2010),(5314,'ICCIT of International Conference on Computer and Information Technology','proceedings',2009),(5315,'ICEIS','proceedings',2003),(5316,'ICEIS International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems','proceedings',2008),(5317,'ICEIS','proceedings',2009),(5318,'ICIS Thirtieth International Conference on Information Systems','proceedings',2009),(5319,'ICISA International Conference on Information Science and Applications','proceedings',2014),(5320,'ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Adaptive and SelfManaging Systems','proceedings',2013),(5321,'ICSOFT (SE)','proceedings',2007),(5322,'ICSOFT','proceedings',2009),(5323,'ICSOFT International Conference on Software Paradigm Trends','proceedings',2012),(5324,'ICSOFT International Joint Conference on Software Technologies','proceedings',2013),(5325,'ICTS','proceedings',2014),(5326,'Web Services (ICWS), IEEE international conference on','proceedings',2010),(5327,'IEE Software','journal',2006),(5328,'Neural Networks, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',1994),(5329,'Software Maintenance, ICSM IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2008),(5330,'Latin America Transactions, IEEE (Revista IEEE America Latina)','journal',2015),(5331,'IEEE Latin America Transactions','proceedings',2005),(5332,'IEEE Pacific RIM Conference on Communications, Computers, and Signal Processing','proceedings',2007),(5333,'Software, IEEE','journal',2001),(5334,'IEEE Software','journal',2005),(5335,'Network Operations and Management Symposium, NOMS IEEE/IFIP','proceedings',2006),(5336,'Computers, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2014),(5337,'Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2008),(5338,'Services Computing, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2015),(5339,'Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on','journal',1998),(5340,'Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2000),(5341,'Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2008),(5342,'Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2013),(5343,'Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2014),(5344,'Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2006),(5345,'Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on','proceedings',2009),(5346,'IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems','journal',2006),(5347,'IEICE transactions on information and systems','journal',2008),(5348,'IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems','journal',2013),(5349,'IEICE transactions on information and systems','proceedings',2004),(5350,'IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems','proceedings',2006),(5351,'IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems','proceedings',2012),(5352,'Software, IET','journal',2010),(5353,'Software, IET','journal',2012),(5354,'IJCAI','proceedings',1997),(5355,'Informatik Forschung und Entwicklung','journal',2007),(5356,'InformatikSpektrum','journal',2008),(5357,'Information and Software Technology','journal',1993),(5358,'Information and software technology','journal',2006),(5359,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2008),(5360,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2010),(5361,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2011),(5362,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2013),(5363,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2014),(5364,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2015),(5365,'Information and Software Technology','proceedings',2013),(5366,'Information Systems','journal',1987),(5367,'Information Systems','journal',1999),(5368,'Information Systems','journal',2014),(5369,'Information Systems','journal',2015),(5370,'Information systems','proceedings',2004),(5371,'Information Systems','proceedings',2012),(5372,'Information Systems and eBusiness Management','journal',2009),(5373,'INFORSID : XXIIIeme Congres Informatique des Organisations et Systemes d Information et de Decision','proceedings',2005),(5374,'Ingenierie des Systemes d Information','journal',2012),(5375,'Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering','journal',2010),(5376,'Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering','\"Article in Press\"',2015),(5377,'Intelligent service robotics','journal',2008),(5378,'Intentional Perspectives on Information Systems Engineering','Book',2010),(5379,'Intentional Perspectives on Information Systems Engineering','bookChapter',2010),(5380,'Interacting with computers','journal',1998),(5381,'Int Arab J Inf Technol','journal',2015),(5382,'Computer Applications Technology (ICCAT), International Conference on','proceedings',2013),(5383,'Journal of Mobile Multimedia','proceedings',2012),(5384,'SelfAdaptive and SelfOrganizing Systems (SASO), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2012),(5385,'International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology','journal',2012),(5386,'International Journal of AgentOriented Software Engineering','journal',2008),(5387,'International Journal of AgentOriented Software Engineering','journal',2009),(5388,'International Journal of Human Computer Studies','journal',1999),(5389,'Journal of Information Processing and Management','journal',2011),(5390,'International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD)','journal',2010),(5391,'Frameworks for Developing Efficient Information Systems: Models, Theory, and Practice: Models, Theory, and Practice','journal',2011),(5392,'International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD)','journal',2012),(5393,'International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD)','journal',2015),(5394,'International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design','proceedings',2011),(5395,'International Journal of Information Technology \\& Decision Making','journal',2006),(5396,'International Journal of Information Technology and Management','journal',2009),(5397,'International Journal of Intelligent Systems','journal',2010),(5398,'International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications','journal',2012),(5399,'International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications','journal',2013),(5400,'International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications','journal',2014),(5401,'International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications','journal',2015),(5402,'International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering','journal',2013),(5403,'International Journal of Web Information Systems','journal',2011),(5404,'International Journal of Web Services Research','journal',2005),(5405,'Inverse Problems','journal',2014),(5406,'Recent Trends in Information, Telecommunication and Computing (ITC), International Conference on','proceedings',2010),(5407,'ITNG International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations','proceedings',2009),(5408,'International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution and the annual ERCIM Workshop on Software Evolution','proceedings',2011),(5409,'Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition)','journal',2009),(5410,'Computer Research and Development','journal',2013),(5411,'Journal of Computational Information Systems','journal',2009),(5412,'Journal of Computational Information Systems','journal',2010),(5413,'Journal of Computational Information Systems','journal',2012),(5414,'International journal of adaptive control and signal processing','journal',1995),(5415,'Journal of Computer Information Systems','journal',2006),(5416,'Journal of Computer Information Systems','journal',2011),(5417,'Journal of Database Management (JDM)','journal',2011),(5418,'Journal of Database Management','journal',2013),(5419,'Journal of Grid Computing','\"Article in Press\"',2015),(5420,'Journal of information processing','journal',2014),(5421,'Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems','journal',2002),(5422,'Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications','journal',2004),(5423,'Journal of Management Information Systems','journal',1992),(5424,'re','journal',2002),(5425,'Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology','journal',2004),(5426,'Journal of software','journal',2011),(5427,'The Journal of Strategic Information Systems','journal',2011),(5428,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2006),(5429,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2007),(5430,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2012),(5431,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2013),(5432,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2014),(5433,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2015),(5434,'Journal of Systems and Software','proceedings',2012),(5435,'The Journal of Technology Transfer','journal',2007),(5436,'Journal of Theoretical \\& Applied Information Technology','journal',2014),(5437,'J UCS','journal',2010),(5438,'J UCS','journal',2012),(5439,'Journal of Visual Languages \\& Computing','journal',2006),(5440,'KMIS International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing,','proceedings',2009),(5441,'Kybernetes','journal',2011),(5442,'Engineering Societies in the Agents World III','proceedings',2003),(5443,'ProMAS','proceedings',2005),(5444,'Enterprise Information Systems','proceedings',2009),(5445,'The Practice of Enterprise Modeling','proceedings',2010),(5446,'Information Systems Evolution','proceedings',2011),(5447,'Business Modeling and Software Design','proceedings',2012),(5448,'Enterprise, BusinessProcess and Information Systems Modeling','proceedings',2013),(5449,'The Practice of Enterprise Modeling','proceedings',2014),(5450,'Enterprise, BusinessProcess and Information Systems Modeling','proceedings',2015),(5451,'Computational Science and Its ApplicationsICCSA','proceedings',2005),(5452,'Journal on Data Semantics I','journal',2003),(5453,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','journal',2004),(5454,'Secure and Trustworthy Service Composition','journal',2014),(5455,'Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)','journal',2015),(5456,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','proceedings',1995),(5457,'Requirements Targeting Software and Systems Engineering','proceedings',1998),(5458,'Logic for Programming and Automated Reasoning','proceedings',1999),(5459,'Reliable SoftwareTechnologies—AdaEurope','proceedings',2001),(5460,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','proceedings',2002),(5461,'KnowledgeBased Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems','proceedings',2005),(5462,'Interactive Systems Design, Specification, and Verification','proceedings',2006),(5463,'On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems : OTM Workshops','proceedings',2007),(5464,'AgentOriented Software Engineering VIII','proceedings',2008),(5465,'Conceptual ModelingER','proceedings',2009),(5466,'Abstract State Machines, Alloy, B and Z','proceedings',2010),(5467,'Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality','proceedings',2011),(5468,'Models in Software Engineering','proceedings',2012),(5469,'Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality','proceedings',2013),(5470,'Conceptual Modeling','proceedings',2014),(5471,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','proceedings',2015),(5472,'Memorias de la Conferencia Iberoamericana de Software Engineering CIbSE','proceedings',2008),(5473,'International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC','proceedings',2009),(5474,'NonFunctional Properties in Service Oriented Architecture: Requirements, Models and Methods','bookChapter',2011),(5475,'NTT Technical Review','journal',2008),(5476,'PACIS','proceedings',2011),(5477,'ACM international workshop on Empirical assessment of software engineering languages and technologies: held in conjunction with the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)','proceedings',2007),(5478,'Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2011),(5479,'Procedia Computer Science','proceedings',2011),(5480,'Procedia computer science','proceedings',2012),(5481,'SignalImage Technology and InternetBased Systems (SITIS), International Conference on','proceedings',2014),(5482,'Computational Science and Engineering, CSE International Conference on','proceedings',2009),(5483,'Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC IEEE International','proceedings',2009),(5484,'Requirements Engineering Conference, RE IEEE International','proceedings',2007),(5485,'Formal Methods and Models for CoDesign, MEMOCODE ACM and IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2003),(5486,'Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE), International Workshop on','proceedings',2011),(5487,'Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on','proceedings',2007),(5488,'IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT','proceedings',2009),(5489,'Services Computing Conference (APSCC), IEEE AsiaPacific','proceedings',2010),(5490,'IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, ICECCS','proceedings',2011),(5491,'SocioTechnical Aspects in Security and Trust (STAST), Workshop on','proceedings',2011),(5492,'Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VSGAMES), International Conference on','proceedings',2011),(5493,'Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), International Conference on the','proceedings',2012),(5494,'Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS), IEEE International Conference and Workshops on','proceedings',2012),(5495,'Services Computing (SCC), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2012),(5496,'Computer and Information Science (ICIS), IEEE/ACIS International Conference on','proceedings',2012),(5497,'Software Engineering (SBES), Brazilian Symposium on','proceedings',2013),(5498,'Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBSEERC), Eastern European Regional Conference on the','proceedings',2013),(5499,'Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), International Conference on the','proceedings',2014),(5500,'Services Computing (SCC), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2014),(5501,'Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, SBES','proceedings',2011),(5502,'SelfAdaptive and SelfOrganizing Systems, SASO IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2008),(5503,'Dependability (DEPEND), International Conference on','proceedings',2010),(5504,'Grid and Pervasive Computing Workshops, GPC Workshops The International Conference on','proceedings',2008),(5505,'Software Components, Architectures and Reuse (SBCARS), Brazilian Symposium on','proceedings',2011),(5506,'Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering (TASE), International Symposium on','proceedings',2011),(5507,'Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), International Conference on the','proceedings',2010),(5508,'Web Services (ECOWS), IEEE European Conference on','proceedings',2011),(5509,'Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture','proceedings',2011),(5510,'Software Engineering Conference, APSEC AsiaPacific','proceedings',2008),(5511,'Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), AsiaPacific','proceedings',2013),(5512,'Engineering of Computer Based Systems, ECBS Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the','proceedings',2008),(5513,'Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, International Conference on','proceedings',2006),(5514,'Sharing and Reusing Architectural KnowledgeArchitecture, Rationale, and Design Intent, SHARK/ADI: ICSE Workshops Workshop on','proceedings',2007),(5515,'Services Computing (SCC), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2013),(5516,'Web Services (ICWS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2013),(5517,'Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2013),(5518,'Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), IEEE International','proceedings',2010),(5519,'IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, EDOC','proceedings',2011),(5520,'Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), IEEE International','proceedings',2013),(5521,'International Computer Software and Applications Conference','proceedings',2005),(5522,'Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC Annual International','proceedings',2007),(5523,'Computer Software and Applications, COMPSAC Annual IEEE International','proceedings',2008),(5524,'International Computer Software and Applications Conference','proceedings',2009),(5525,'Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW), IEEE Annual','proceedings',2010),(5526,'Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), IEEE Annual','proceedings',2011),(5527,'Computer Science and Software Engineering, International Conference on','proceedings',2008),(5528,'International Conference on Data Engineering','proceedings',1994),(5529,'Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), International Conference on','proceedings',2011),(5530,'International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science','proceedings',2012),(5531,'Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2013),(5532,'Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2014),(5533,'Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2015),(5534,'International Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2002),(5535,'International Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2003),(5536,'International Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2004),(5537,'international workshop on Scenarios and state machines: models, algorithms, and tools','proceedings',2006),(5538,'international workshop on Software engineering for adaptive and selfmanaging systems','proceedings',2008),(5539,'international conference on software engineering','proceedings',2009),(5540,'ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Adaptive and SelfManaging Systems','proceedings',2010),(5541,'International Conference on Software and Systems Process','proceedings',2011),(5542,'International Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2012),(5543,'Data and Software Engineering (ICODSE), International Conference on','proceedings',2014),(5544,'ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies','proceedings',2003),(5545,'Computer Games (CGAMES), International Conference on','proceedings',2012),(5546,'the IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications (SEA )','proceedings',2006),(5547,'international conference on Aspectoriented software development companion','proceedings',2011),(5548,'WER','proceedings',2009),(5549,'Dependable Computing, PRDC IEEE Pacific Rim International Symposium on','proceedings',2008),(5550,'Advanced Computing and Communications, ADCOM International Conference on','proceedings',2007),(5551,'workshop on Early aspects','proceedings',2009),(5552,'International Requirements Engineering, RE IEEE','proceedings',2008),(5553,'conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research','proceedings',2006),(5554,'Information Reuse and Integration, IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2006),(5555,'International Conference on Information Quality, ICIQ','proceedings',2007),(5556,'Spring simulation multiconference','proceedings',2008),(5557,'Web Mining and Webbased Application, WMWA PacificAsia Conference on','proceedings',2009),(5558,'Research Challenges in Information Science, RCIS International Conference on','proceedings',2009),(5559,'ICSE Workshop on AspectOriented Requirements Engineering and Architecture Design','proceedings',2009),(5560,'Software Engineering for Adaptive and SelfManaging Systems, SEAMS ICSE Workshop on','proceedings',2009),(5561,'Software Engineering in Health Care, SEHC ICSE Workshop on','proceedings',2009),(5562,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2010),(5563,'Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), International Conference on','proceedings',2011),(5564,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2011),(5565,'Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops \\& PhD Forum (IPDPSW), IEEE International','proceedings',2012),(5566,'Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), International Conference on','proceedings',2013),(5567,'CLEI','proceedings',2013),(5568,'Advance Computing Conference (IACC), IEEE International','proceedings',2013),(5569,'Autonomy Requirements Engineering for Space Missions','proceedings',2013),(5570,'SEKE','proceedings',2009),(5571,'Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS)','proceedings',2013),(5572,'International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, RCIS','proceedings',2008),(5573,'International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology','proceedings',2009),(5574,'International Workshop on Architectures, Concepts and Technologies for Service Oriented Computing, ACTSOC , in Conjunction withICSOFT','proceedings',2010),(5575,'IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, SEA','proceedings',2012),(5576,'IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI ), California, USA','proceedings',2007),(5577,'Workshop on Models@ run time','proceedings',2012),(5578,'International Workshop on Modelling, Simulation, Verification and Validation of Enterprise Information Systems, MSVVEIS , in Conjunction with ICEIS','proceedings',2010),(5579,'Joint Conference on KnowledgeBased Software Engineering, JCKBSE','proceedings',2010),(5580,'ACM Workshop on Quality of Protection','proceedings',2008),(5581,'ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering','proceedings',2012),(5582,'ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering','proceedings',2002),(5583,'ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes','proceedings',2004),(5584,'ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering','proceedings',2006),(5585,'ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of software engineering','proceedings',2008),(5586,'ACM symposium on Applied computing','proceedings',2005),(5587,'ACM symposium on Applied computing','proceedings',2008),(5588,'ACM symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2009),(5589,'ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2010),(5590,'ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2011),(5591,'Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2012),(5592,'Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2013),(5593,'Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2014),(5594,'Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association','proceedings',2009),(5595,'Software Engineering, ASWEC Australian Conference on','proceedings',2008),(5596,'Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC), Australian','proceedings',2010),(5597,'European Conference on eGovernment, Haagse Hogeschool, Den Haag, The Netherlands','proceedings',2007),(5598,'IADIS International Conference eLearning','proceedings',2012),(5599,'TPMC','proceedings',2012),(5600,'IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering, SE','proceedings',2008),(5601,'IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering: part of the IASTED International MultiConference on Applied Informatics, SE','proceedings',2005),(5602,'Requirements Engineering, IEEE International Symposium on','journal',1999),(5603,'Requirements Engineering, IEEE International Symposium on','proceedings',1997),(5604,'Requirements Engineering, IEEE International Symposium on','proceedings',2001),(5605,'Requirements Engineering, IEEE Joint International Conference on','proceedings',2002),(5606,'Requirements Engineering','proceedings',2003),(5607,'Requirements Engineering Conference, IEEE International','proceedings',2004),(5608,'Requirements Engineering, IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2005),(5609,'RE','proceedings',2006),(5610,'Requirements Engineering Conference, RE IEEE International','proceedings',2009),(5611,'Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2014),(5612,'IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics','proceedings',1989),(5613,'Visualization','proceedings',1997),(5614,'International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems','proceedings',2009),(5615,'International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems','proceedings',2012),(5616,'International Conference of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE)','proceedings',2013),(5617,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2014),(5618,'of The International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent SystemsVolume','proceedings',2009),(5619,'International Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems','proceedings',2006),(5620,'Engineering of ComputerBased Systems, ECBS Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the','proceedings',2007),(5621,'ISCA International Conference on Computer Applications in Industry and Engineering, CAINE','proceedings',2011),(5622,'Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), IEEE International Workshop on','proceedings',2012),(5623,'Production Planning \\& Control','proceedings',2011),(5624,'REFSQ International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, In Conjunction with CAiSE','proceedings',2006),(5625,'Relating System Quality and Software Architecture','bookChapter',2014),(5626,'Requirements Engineering','journal',1996),(5627,'Requirements engineering','journal',2009),(5628,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2010),(5629,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2011),(5630,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2012),(5631,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2013),(5632,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2014),(5633,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2015),(5634,'Requirements Engineering','\"Article in Press\"',2014),(5635,'Requirements Engineering','\"Article in Press\"',2015),(5636,'Journal of Software','journal',2010),(5637,'Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software','journal',2011),(5638,'SAGAware International Workshop on Situation Activity and Goal Awareness','proceedings',2011),(5639,'Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience','journal',2014),(5640,'Science China Information Sciences','journal',2014),(5641,'Science of Computer Programming','proceedings',2015),(5642,'Requirements Engineering, IEEE International Conference','proceedings',2006),(5643,'Service Oriented Computing and Applications','journal',2013),(5644,'SIGMOD Record','proceedings',2006),(5645,'Situational Awareness in Computer Network Defense: Principles, Methods and Applications: Principles, Methods and Applications','bookChapter',2012),(5646,'SMARTGREENS International Conference on Smart Grids and Green IT Systems','proceedings',2012),(5647,'Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), ACIS International Conference on','proceedings',2013),(5648,'Software \\& Systems Modeling','\"Article in Press\"',2014),(5649,'Software \\& Systems Modeling','journal',2005),(5650,'Software and Systems Modeling','journal',2014),(5651,'Software \\& Systems Modeling','\"Article in Press\"',2015),(5652,'Situational Awareness in Computer Network Defense: Principles, Methods and Applications: Principles, Methods and Applications','bookChapter',2013),(5653,'Software Process Improvement and Practice','journal',2006),(5654,'Software Quality Journal','journal',2012),(5655,'Software Quality Journal','\"Article in Press\"',2015),(5656,'Software Reuse in the Emerging Cloud Computing Era','bookChapter',2012),(5657,'SPCA : International Symposium on Pervasive Computing and Applications,','proceedings',2007),(5658,'Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications','journal',2010),(5659,'Studies in Computational Intelligence','proceedings',2011),(5660,'Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications','proceedings',2012),(5661,'The Art and Science of Analyzing Software Data','bookChapter',2015),(5662,'Virtual and Physical Prototyping','\"Article in Press\"',2015),(5663,'Virtual Organizations: Systems and Practices','bookChapter',2005),(5664,'Virtual Reality','journal',2000),(5665,'of The World Congress on Engineering','proceedings',2010),(5666,'VIII Workshop in Requirements Engineering','proceedings',2005),(5667,'Simulation Conference Winter','proceedings',1995),(5668,'WMSCI The World MultiConference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics,','proceedings',2005),(5669,'Journal of System Simulation','journal',2008),(5670,'Journal of System Simulation','journal',2009),(5671,'Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice','journal',2013),(5672,'XXVIIIeme Congres INFORSID','proceedings',2010),(5673,'ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb','journal',2007),(5674,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2010),(5675,'Requirements engineering','journal',2013),(5676,'ComponentBased Software Quality','bookChapter',2003),(5677,'Transactions on aspectoriented software development VII','journal',2010),(5678,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2005),(5679,'Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), IEEE International','proceedings',2011),(5680,'Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC Annual International','proceedings',2005),(5681,'','',0),(5682,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','proceedings',2003),(5683,'SERA','proceedings',2004),(5684,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','proceedings',2002),(5685,'Reuse of OfftheShelf Components','proceedings',2006),(5686,'IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering','proceedings',2009),(5687,'Conceptual ModelingER','proceedings',2010),(5688,'Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering','proceedings',2004),(5689,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2012),(5690,'Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2011),(5691,'Software Engineering for Collective Autonomic Systems','bookChapter',2015);

--
-- Table structure for table `publishers`
--

CREATE TABLE `publishers` (
  `ID` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `name` varchar(45) CHARACTER SET utf8 NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=41 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `publishers`
--

INSERT INTO `publishers` VALUES (21,''),(22,'IEEE'),(23,'Springer'),(24,'Elsevier'),(25,'ACM'),(26,'Else'),(27,'Kluwer Academic Publishers'),(28,'Wiley'),(29,'IGI Global'),(30,'J.UCS consortium'),(31,'Citeseer'),(32,'Taylor & Francis'),(33,'IEE'),(34,'CEUR-WS'),(35,'Australian Computer Society'),(36,'CRL Publishing'),(37,'Academy Publisher'),(38,'Emerald'),(39,'Engineering Science Reference'),(40,'The Institute of Electronics, Information and');

--
-- Table structure for table `references`
--

CREATE TABLE `references` (
  `surveyPaper_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `paper_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `refClassification` varchar(45) CHARACTER SET utf8 DEFAULT NULL,
  `doubtReference` tinyint(1) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`surveyPaper_id`,`paper_id`),
  KEY `fk_surveyPaper_has_paper_paper1_idx` (`paper_id`),
  KEY `fk_surveyPaper_has_paper_surveyPaper1_idx` (`surveyPaper_id`),
  CONSTRAINT `fk_surveyPaper_has_paper_paper1` FOREIGN KEY (`paper_id`) REFERENCES `papers` (`ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
  CONSTRAINT `fk_surveyPaper_has_paper_surveyPaper1` FOREIGN KEY (`surveyPaper_id`) REFERENCES `surveyPapers` (`ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `references`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `reviewers`
--

CREATE TABLE `reviewers` (
  `ID` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `name` varchar(45) DEFAULT NULL,
  `pwd` varchar(45) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=13 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `reviewers`
--

INSERT INTO `reviewers` VALUES (1,'mattia','mattia'),(2,'jennifer','jennifer'),(3,'tong','tong'),(4,'evellin','evellin'),(5,'feng-lin','feng-lin'),(6,'kostas','kostas'),(7,'elda','elda'),(8,'alejandro','alejandro'),(9,'silvia','silvia'),(10,'paolo','paolo'),(11,'john','john'),(12,'basak','basak');

--
-- Table structure for table `reviews`
--

CREATE TABLE `reviews` (
  `reviewers_ID` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `surveyPaper_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `stage_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `doubtTopic` tinyint(1) DEFAULT '0',
  `doubtVenue` tinyint(1) DEFAULT '0',
  `doubtClassification` tinyint(1) DEFAULT '0',
  `doubtVenueType` tinyint(1) DEFAULT NULL,
  `doubtPublisher` tinyint(1) DEFAULT NULL,
  `doubtFramework` tinyint(1) DEFAULT NULL,
  `doubtTopics` tinyint(1) DEFAULT NULL,
  `timestamp` timestamp NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  `SBDepth` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`reviewers_ID`,`surveyPaper_ID`,`stage_ID`),
  KEY `fk_person_has_surveyPaper_surveyPaper1_idx` (`surveyPaper_ID`),
  KEY `fk_person_has_surveyPaper_person1_idx` (`reviewers_ID`),
  KEY `fk_reviews_stage1_idx` (`stage_ID`),
  CONSTRAINT `fk_person_has_surveyPaper_surveyPaper1` FOREIGN KEY (`surveyPaper_ID`) REFERENCES `surveyPapers` (`ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
  CONSTRAINT `fk_reviewers_has_surveyPaper_reviewers1` FOREIGN KEY (`reviewers_ID`) REFERENCES `reviewers` (`ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
  CONSTRAINT `fk_reviews_stage1` FOREIGN KEY (`stage_ID`) REFERENCES `stages` (`ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=13 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `reviews`
--

INSERT INTO `reviews` VALUES (1,6963,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:16:09',NULL),(1,6969,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 08:28:50',NULL),(1,6972,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 11:00:27',NULL),(1,6973,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 08:52:50',NULL),(1,6974,3,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,'2016-02-23 14:26:30',NULL),(1,6975,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 16:17:13',NULL),(1,6981,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 11:27:06',NULL),(1,6987,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-04 09:09:52',NULL),(1,6993,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:25:42',NULL),(1,6999,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 08:31:01',NULL),(1,7001,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 15:28:35',NULL),(1,7002,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 11:03:42',NULL),(1,7003,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 09:00:41',NULL),(1,7004,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-23 14:33:20',NULL),(1,7005,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 08:09:58',NULL),(1,7011,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 15:24:39',NULL),(1,7023,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 11:50:59',NULL),(1,7023,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:24:24',NULL),(1,7029,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 16:13:25',NULL),(1,7032,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 11:19:12',NULL),(1,7033,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 10:12:18',NULL),(1,7034,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 14:39:51',NULL),(1,7035,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 17:01:02',NULL),(1,7035,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 17:03:45',NULL),(1,7041,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:27:44',NULL),(1,7047,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 14:59:51',NULL),(1,7053,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:28:46',NULL),(1,7059,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 15:42:08',NULL),(1,7059,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 16:44:04',NULL),(1,7060,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 17:02:35',NULL),(1,7062,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 11:22:29',NULL),(1,7063,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 10:16:38',NULL),(1,7064,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 14:50:19',NULL),(1,7065,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 08:25:31',NULL),(1,7071,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:31:21',NULL),(1,7071,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 09:54:12',NULL),(1,7077,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 10:36:52',NULL),(1,7083,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 10:48:38',NULL),(1,7089,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:33:27',NULL),(1,7092,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 12:58:03',NULL),(1,7093,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 08:40:41',NULL),(1,7094,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 17:28:00',NULL),(1,7095,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 12:38:44',NULL),(1,7101,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 12:42:12',NULL),(1,7101,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 12:42:54',NULL),(1,7107,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 12:45:51',NULL),(1,7113,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 13:16:27',NULL),(1,7119,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 15:44:39',NULL),(1,7121,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 15:51:15',NULL),(1,7122,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 12:59:22',NULL),(1,7123,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 10:22:41',NULL),(1,7124,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 08:33:54',NULL),(1,7125,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 16:34:10',NULL),(1,7131,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 13:26:15',NULL),(1,7137,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 17:08:50',NULL),(1,7143,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 13:19:15',NULL),(1,7149,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 14:01:17',NULL),(1,7152,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 07:43:53',NULL),(1,7153,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-24 10:26:42',NULL),(1,7154,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-24 08:37:25',NULL),(1,7155,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 08:23:31',NULL),(1,7161,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 08:53:32',NULL),(1,7167,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:35:33',NULL),(1,7173,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 13:21:56',NULL),(1,7179,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 15:52:30',NULL),(1,7180,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 17:19:44',NULL),(1,7181,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 08:41:59',NULL),(1,7182,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 13:03:51',NULL),(1,7183,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 10:37:25',NULL),(1,7184,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 08:40:31',NULL),(1,7185,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 16:44:00',NULL),(1,7191,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 09:45:20',NULL),(1,7197,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 17:22:52',NULL),(1,7203,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 10:31:40',NULL),(1,7209,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 10:37:58',NULL),(1,7211,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 16:14:25',NULL),(1,7212,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 13:06:23',NULL),(1,7213,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 10:38:23',NULL),(1,7214,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 08:41:58',NULL),(1,7215,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 16:45:32',NULL),(1,7227,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 17:26:27',NULL),(1,7239,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 13:03:07',NULL),(1,7243,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 08:34:03',NULL),(1,7244,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 08:43:25',NULL),(1,7245,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 13:14:30',NULL),(1,7251,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 13:21:45',NULL),(1,7257,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 17:30:15',NULL),(1,7263,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 13:51:49',NULL),(1,7269,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:38:05',NULL),(1,7271,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 16:21:32',NULL),(1,7272,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 13:10:19',NULL),(1,7273,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 10:49:19',NULL),(1,7274,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-29 08:38:47',NULL),(1,7275,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 16:50:58',NULL),(1,7281,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 09:18:21',NULL),(1,7287,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 15:29:18',NULL),(1,7293,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-03 10:41:14',NULL),(1,7299,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:39:16',NULL),(1,7300,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 14:20:29',NULL),(1,7302,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 13:17:01',NULL),(1,7303,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 10:53:31',NULL),(1,7305,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 16:59:43',NULL),(1,7311,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 16:05:01',NULL),(2,6960,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 11:25:46',NULL),(2,6966,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:01:12',NULL),(2,6972,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-20 09:26:27',NULL),(2,6978,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-20 09:27:49',NULL),(2,6984,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-20 09:29:01',NULL),(2,6987,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 19:16:20',NULL),(2,6988,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-16 12:18:35',NULL),(2,6989,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 10:41:15',NULL),(2,6990,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-17 12:57:55',NULL),(2,6996,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:02:51',NULL),(2,7002,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 11:21:32',NULL),(2,7008,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:30:55',NULL),(2,7014,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-20 09:35:36',NULL),(2,7018,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-16 12:20:16',NULL),(2,7019,2,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-16 10:42:31',NULL),(2,7020,2,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-17 15:55:00',NULL),(2,7026,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 19:44:43',NULL),(2,7026,2,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-19 18:36:54',NULL),(2,7032,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 20:04:16',NULL),(2,7038,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:39:32',NULL),(2,7044,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 20:36:16',NULL),(2,7047,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-16 20:29:31',NULL),(2,7048,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 12:25:09',NULL),(2,7049,2,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-16 10:50:20',NULL),(2,7050,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 20:37:48',NULL),(2,7056,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 21:03:37',NULL),(2,7062,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 17:21:59',NULL),(2,7068,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 18:22:35',NULL),(2,7074,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 15:24:19',NULL),(2,7077,3,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-16 20:42:45',NULL),(2,7078,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 12:29:57',NULL),(2,7079,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 10:59:33',NULL),(2,7080,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 19:35:47',NULL),(2,7086,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 16:55:07',NULL),(2,7086,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 19:42:03',NULL),(2,7092,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 17:09:45',NULL),(2,7098,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 17:27:52',NULL),(2,7104,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 17:30:16',NULL),(2,7106,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-17 16:38:33',NULL),(2,7107,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 20:46:48',NULL),(2,7108,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 12:33:53',NULL),(2,7109,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 11:01:46',NULL),(2,7110,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 14:53:37',NULL),(2,7116,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 11:23:11',NULL),(2,7122,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 17:44:08',NULL),(2,7128,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 11:34:13',NULL),(2,7128,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 11:33:35',NULL),(2,7134,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:07:43',NULL),(2,7136,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-17 16:46:07',NULL),(2,7137,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-16 21:06:06',NULL),(2,7138,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-16 12:43:14',NULL),(2,7139,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-16 11:19:34',NULL),(2,7140,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 19:27:00',NULL),(2,7146,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 19:47:16',NULL),(2,7152,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 21:09:51',NULL),(2,7152,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 14:43:26',NULL),(2,7158,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:47:59',NULL),(2,7164,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 15:28:22',NULL),(2,7167,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-17 15:08:46',NULL),(2,7168,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 13:18:35',NULL),(2,7169,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-16 11:41:30',NULL),(2,7170,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 14:55:15',NULL),(2,7176,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 11:10:22',NULL),(2,7182,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 21:10:16',NULL),(2,7194,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 11:39:42',NULL),(2,7197,3,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,'2016-02-25 21:36:44',NULL),(2,7198,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-16 18:06:53',NULL),(2,7199,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-16 11:49:31',NULL),(2,7200,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 12:46:51',NULL),(2,7206,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:16:25',NULL),(2,7212,2,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-25 21:53:33',NULL),(2,7218,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 14:21:53',NULL),(2,7224,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 14:05:56',NULL),(2,7227,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-17 15:30:40',NULL),(2,7228,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-16 18:41:56',NULL),(2,7229,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-16 11:50:49',NULL),(2,7230,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 14:46:48',NULL),(2,7236,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 18:24:33',NULL),(2,7242,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 14:48:32',NULL),(2,7248,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:50:46',NULL),(2,7254,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 15:30:53',NULL),(2,7256,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 15:50:00',NULL),(2,7257,3,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,'2016-02-17 15:39:33',NULL),(2,7258,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 18:52:45',NULL),(2,7259,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-16 12:02:32',NULL),(2,7266,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 12:58:25',NULL),(2,7272,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 21:55:52',NULL),(2,7278,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:08:45',NULL),(2,7284,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 17:16:39',NULL),(2,7286,2,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-18 15:50:27',NULL),(2,7286,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 15:50:53',NULL),(2,7287,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-17 15:40:03',NULL),(2,7288,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 18:53:52',NULL),(2,7289,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-16 12:03:03',NULL),(2,7290,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 17:50:30',NULL),(2,7296,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 18:07:04',NULL),(2,7302,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 11:24:38',NULL),(2,7309,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-18 20:08:50',NULL),(3,6964,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 20:07:24',NULL),(3,6966,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-14 19:58:42',NULL),(3,6967,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-14 18:44:47',NULL),(3,6968,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 17:28:25',NULL),(3,6969,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 10:44:23',NULL),(3,6970,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 10:49:39',NULL),(3,6976,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 12:15:36',NULL),(3,6982,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 10:50:56',NULL),(3,6988,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 17:13:30',NULL),(3,6994,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 12:05:11',NULL),(3,6996,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-14 20:07:37',NULL),(3,6997,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 18:50:02',NULL),(3,6998,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 17:33:35',NULL),(3,6999,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-19 11:49:39',NULL),(3,7000,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 12:05:49',NULL),(3,7006,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-20 09:10:26',NULL),(3,7012,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 12:11:15',NULL),(3,7018,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 17:19:03',NULL),(3,7024,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 12:14:05',NULL),(3,7025,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-13 16:38:45',NULL),(3,7026,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-14 20:11:54',NULL),(3,7027,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 12:17:36',NULL),(3,7028,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 17:35:32',NULL),(3,7029,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-14 16:23:55',NULL),(3,7030,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 12:13:44',NULL),(3,7036,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-20 09:09:46',NULL),(3,7042,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 13:31:17',NULL),(3,7048,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 12:16:40',NULL),(3,7054,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:36:39',NULL),(3,7055,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-13 17:00:22',NULL),(3,7056,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 20:21:44',NULL),(3,7057,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 18:58:43',NULL),(3,7059,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-14 16:31:01',NULL),(3,7060,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 12:20:52',NULL),(3,7066,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 12:28:34',NULL),(3,7072,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:57:47',NULL),(3,7078,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 15:06:36',NULL),(3,7084,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 15:13:09',NULL),(3,7086,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 20:25:12',NULL),(3,7087,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 19:00:17',NULL),(3,7088,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 17:55:58',NULL),(3,7089,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 11:53:57',NULL),(3,7090,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 15:18:58',NULL),(3,7096,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 15:23:00',NULL),(3,7102,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 13:37:49',NULL),(3,7108,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 15:32:19',NULL),(3,7114,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 16:02:12',NULL),(3,7115,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-13 17:13:17',NULL),(3,7116,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 20:34:02',NULL),(3,7117,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-14 19:09:03',NULL),(3,7118,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 18:05:17',NULL),(3,7119,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-19 11:56:33',NULL),(3,7120,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 16:06:43',NULL),(3,7126,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-20 09:15:04',NULL),(3,7132,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 13:52:07',NULL),(3,7138,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 17:20:58',NULL),(3,7144,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 16:26:31',NULL),(3,7146,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 20:35:53',NULL),(3,7147,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 19:18:26',NULL),(3,7148,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 18:06:38',NULL),(3,7149,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 16:58:27',NULL),(3,7150,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 16:31:35',NULL),(3,7156,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-20 09:17:46',NULL),(3,7162,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 13:56:57',NULL),(3,7168,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 16:45:28',NULL),(3,7174,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 20:08:23',NULL),(3,7175,3,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-19 10:27:40',NULL),(3,7176,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 20:44:29',NULL),(3,7177,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 19:20:17',NULL),(3,7178,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 18:07:58',NULL),(3,7179,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-14 17:04:31',NULL),(3,7180,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 08:19:56',NULL),(3,7186,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-20 09:19:10',NULL),(3,7192,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 09:35:34',NULL),(3,7198,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 17:24:29',NULL),(3,7204,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 20:09:07',NULL),(3,7205,3,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 10:31:56',NULL),(3,7206,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-19 12:31:12',NULL),(3,7207,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 12:23:59',NULL),(3,7208,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 18:08:25',NULL),(3,7209,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 17:09:43',NULL),(3,7210,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 09:10:36',NULL),(3,7216,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 09:27:38',NULL),(3,7222,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 14:00:18',NULL),(3,7228,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 17:30:15',NULL),(3,7234,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 10:07:47',NULL),(3,7235,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 15:18:49',NULL),(3,7236,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-15 07:52:07',NULL),(3,7237,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 19:34:08',NULL),(3,7238,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 18:09:09',NULL),(3,7239,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 17:12:35',NULL),(3,7240,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 12:16:31',NULL),(3,7246,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 10:12:43',NULL),(3,7252,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 10:16:34',NULL),(3,7258,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 10:17:21',NULL),(3,7264,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 10:20:59',NULL),(3,7265,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 15:43:35',NULL),(3,7266,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-15 07:53:40',NULL),(3,7267,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 19:37:04',NULL),(3,7269,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 17:17:53',NULL),(3,7270,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 09:21:34',NULL),(3,7276,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 10:41:26',NULL),(3,7282,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 14:08:18',NULL),(3,7288,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 10:48:35',NULL),(3,7294,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:41:29',NULL),(3,7295,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 15:50:27',NULL),(3,7296,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-15 07:55:10',NULL),(3,7297,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 19:39:06',NULL),(3,7298,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-14 18:19:40',NULL),(3,7299,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-14 17:22:42',NULL),(3,7300,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:44:06',NULL),(3,7306,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 10:59:28',NULL),(3,7312,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 14:10:56',NULL),(4,6961,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 21:54:05',NULL),(4,6963,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 09:27:24',NULL),(4,6964,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 08:17:25',NULL),(4,6965,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 15:58:18',NULL),(4,6965,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 13:33:45',NULL),(4,6965,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-26 10:10:52',NULL),(4,6971,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 11:06:10',NULL),(4,6971,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 12:35:05',NULL),(4,6977,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 12:46:05',NULL),(4,6983,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 10:56:27',NULL),(4,6983,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:57:16',NULL),(4,6989,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 12:38:49',NULL),(4,6991,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 22:31:44',NULL),(4,6993,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-26 08:27:34',NULL),(4,6995,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 12:58:34',NULL),(4,6995,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-26 12:18:22',NULL),(4,7001,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:34:12',NULL),(4,7007,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 14:03:29',NULL),(4,7013,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 13:24:28',NULL),(4,7019,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 15:21:52',NULL),(4,7019,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 10:20:34',NULL),(4,7021,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 07:13:53',NULL),(4,7022,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-26 09:32:22',NULL),(4,7023,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-26 08:57:28',NULL),(4,7025,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 14:03:00',NULL),(4,7031,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 16:51:13',NULL),(4,7037,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 12:42:46',NULL),(4,7043,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 07:52:28',NULL),(4,7049,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 10:59:46',NULL),(4,7049,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 10:21:47',NULL),(4,7051,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 07:38:34',NULL),(4,7055,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 14:17:54',NULL),(4,7061,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 13:01:08',NULL),(4,7061,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 13:00:15',NULL),(4,7067,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 11:49:15',NULL),(4,7069,3,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,'2016-02-25 10:02:13',NULL),(4,7073,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 12:07:50',NULL),(4,7079,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 10:24:45',NULL),(4,7080,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-25 09:08:17',NULL),(4,7081,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-25 07:45:29',NULL),(4,7085,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 14:45:26',NULL),(4,7085,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-26 10:26:39',NULL),(4,7091,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 14:02:04',NULL),(4,7091,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 13:02:32',NULL),(4,7097,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 14:48:07',NULL),(4,7103,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 15:10:14',NULL),(4,7109,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 15:59:28',NULL),(4,7110,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 09:25:41',NULL),(4,7111,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-25 07:53:44',NULL),(4,7113,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-26 09:05:04',NULL),(4,7115,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 16:06:36',NULL),(4,7121,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 17:03:30',NULL),(4,7121,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 17:05:48',NULL),(4,7127,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-31 11:32:28',NULL),(4,7133,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 13:32:53',NULL),(4,7139,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 10:54:57',NULL),(4,7140,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-25 09:29:47',NULL),(4,7141,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 08:23:51',NULL),(4,7143,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-26 09:06:21',NULL),(4,7145,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 13:02:37',NULL),(4,7145,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-26 10:32:19',NULL),(4,7151,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-31 16:12:06',NULL),(4,7151,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 13:05:08',NULL),(4,7157,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-31 17:11:54',NULL),(4,7163,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 13:33:31',NULL),(4,7169,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 12:53:30',NULL),(4,7169,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-31 21:33:20',NULL),(4,7170,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 09:35:36',NULL),(4,7171,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 08:29:59',NULL),(4,7173,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-26 09:07:40',NULL),(4,7175,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-31 21:31:07',NULL),(4,7175,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-26 10:38:02',NULL),(4,7181,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 14:53:53',NULL),(4,7187,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 08:27:38',NULL),(4,7193,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 13:43:23',NULL),(4,7199,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 12:57:52',NULL),(4,7200,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-25 09:37:17',NULL),(4,7201,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-25 08:33:44',NULL),(4,7202,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-26 09:34:34',NULL),(4,7205,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 09:59:57',NULL),(4,7205,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-26 10:39:05',NULL),(4,7211,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 10:15:58',NULL),(4,7217,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 13:05:15',NULL),(4,7223,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 13:06:54',NULL),(4,7229,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 14:18:54',NULL),(4,7231,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 09:00:04',NULL),(4,7233,3,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-26 09:08:56',NULL),(4,7235,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 13:08:51',NULL),(4,7241,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 13:10:31',NULL),(4,7247,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 15:51:40',NULL),(4,7253,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 13:51:01',NULL),(4,7259,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-29 10:32:36',NULL),(4,7261,2,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-25 09:05:15',NULL),(4,7261,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 09:04:41',NULL),(4,7262,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-24 15:55:07',NULL),(4,7265,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-26 13:14:46',NULL),(4,7271,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 21:25:47',NULL),(4,7277,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 21:47:39',NULL),(4,7283,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-01 21:55:30',NULL),(4,7289,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 07:58:43',NULL),(4,7292,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 20:42:43',NULL),(4,7295,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 08:00:35',NULL),(4,7301,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 08:58:40',NULL),(4,7301,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-28 09:17:25',NULL),(4,7307,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 09:03:13',NULL),(4,7313,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 09:18:17',NULL),(4,7319,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 09:30:54',NULL),(7,6961,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:30:24',NULL),(7,6961,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:20:50',NULL),(7,6967,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 08:56:59',NULL),(7,6967,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:22:18',NULL),(7,6970,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 14:21:14',NULL),(7,6973,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 14:10:17',NULL),(7,6973,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:32:46',NULL),(7,6979,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 13:37:24',NULL),(7,6979,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:34:53',NULL),(7,6980,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 16:20:16',NULL),(7,6981,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 10:45:14',NULL),(7,6982,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-25 10:15:56',NULL),(7,6983,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-24 07:53:38',NULL),(7,6984,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 10:30:03',NULL),(7,6985,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 12:56:10',NULL),(7,6985,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:24:57',NULL),(7,6991,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 13:55:44',NULL),(7,6991,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:36:57',NULL),(7,6997,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 14:29:52',NULL),(7,6997,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:37:37',NULL),(7,7000,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 14:28:28',NULL),(7,7003,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 14:39:49',NULL),(7,7003,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:38:34',NULL),(7,7009,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 14:48:42',NULL),(7,7009,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:39:19',NULL),(7,7010,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 16:20:37',NULL),(7,7011,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-26 10:47:54',NULL),(7,7012,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-25 10:25:10',NULL),(7,7013,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 21:57:15',NULL),(7,7014,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 10:33:26',NULL),(7,7015,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 12:59:33',NULL),(7,7015,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:40:02',NULL),(7,7021,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 15:16:03',NULL),(7,7021,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:28:51',NULL),(7,7027,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:42:05',NULL),(7,7030,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-23 14:34:23',NULL),(7,7033,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 17:31:04',NULL),(7,7039,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 17:49:52',NULL),(7,7040,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 16:24:23',NULL),(7,7041,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 20:54:31',NULL),(7,7042,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 10:28:49',NULL),(7,7043,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 22:06:09',NULL),(7,7044,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 10:45:52',NULL),(7,7045,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 17:54:07',NULL),(7,7051,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:43:05',NULL),(7,7057,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 17:50:29',NULL),(7,7060,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 14:34:40',NULL),(7,7063,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-27 08:45:15',NULL),(7,7069,2,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 08:26:54',NULL),(7,7070,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 16:38:05',NULL),(7,7071,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 21:01:06',NULL),(7,7072,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-03 08:31:43',NULL),(7,7073,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 22:13:19',NULL),(7,7074,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 10:57:00',NULL),(7,7075,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 13:01:41',NULL),(7,7081,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:46:11',NULL),(7,7087,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-27 08:49:50',NULL),(7,7090,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 14:48:30',NULL),(7,7093,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 12:46:54',NULL),(7,7099,2,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 10:12:32',NULL),(7,7100,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 16:38:30',NULL),(7,7101,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 21:01:40',NULL),(7,7102,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-25 10:33:47',NULL),(7,7103,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 22:13:46',NULL),(7,7104,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 13:30:55',NULL),(7,7105,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 13:04:55',NULL),(7,7111,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-04 09:16:17',NULL),(7,7117,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 08:59:04',NULL),(7,7120,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 14:50:19',NULL),(7,7123,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-27 10:14:39',NULL),(7,7123,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-27 10:18:16',NULL),(7,7129,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 08:33:24',NULL),(7,7130,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 16:49:07',NULL),(7,7132,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 10:41:01',NULL),(7,7134,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 13:40:21',NULL),(7,7135,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:53:01',NULL),(7,7141,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:56:10',NULL),(7,7147,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-04 09:11:07',NULL),(7,7150,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 15:01:25',NULL),(7,7153,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 12:48:13',NULL),(7,7159,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-24 08:34:12',NULL),(7,7159,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-27 15:01:07',NULL),(7,7160,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 17:10:47',NULL),(7,7162,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-25 10:46:27',NULL),(7,7163,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 22:21:18',NULL),(7,7164,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 13:46:25',NULL),(7,7165,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 13:57:27',NULL),(7,7171,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 13:10:49',NULL),(7,7177,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 14:09:25',NULL),(7,7180,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-24 08:05:50',NULL),(7,7183,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 13:12:02',NULL),(7,7189,2,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-24 08:40:02',NULL),(7,7190,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 17:16:37',NULL),(7,7192,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 10:48:00',NULL),(7,7193,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 08:04:02',NULL),(7,7194,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 13:47:15',NULL),(7,7195,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 13:30:24',NULL),(7,7201,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 13:43:52',NULL),(7,7207,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 09:02:03',NULL),(7,7210,3,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 15:02:13',NULL),(7,7213,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 14:04:40',NULL),(7,7219,2,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-24 08:42:54',NULL),(7,7220,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 17:21:05',NULL),(7,7222,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 10:54:14',NULL),(7,7224,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 13:47:53',NULL),(7,7225,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 14:33:48',NULL),(7,7231,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 14:04:41',NULL),(7,7237,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 15:02:20',NULL),(7,7240,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 15:06:50',NULL),(7,7243,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 12:41:35',NULL),(7,7249,2,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-24 08:49:29',NULL),(7,7250,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 17:21:24',NULL),(7,7251,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 21:02:51',NULL),(7,7252,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-25 10:59:45',NULL),(7,7253,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 22:29:25',NULL),(7,7254,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 13:55:41',NULL),(7,7255,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 14:05:50',NULL),(7,7261,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 14:32:52',NULL),(7,7267,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 17:51:05',NULL),(7,7270,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 15:12:40',NULL),(7,7273,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 21:40:09',NULL),(7,7279,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-28 14:33:18',NULL),(7,7281,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 21:03:22',NULL),(7,7282,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-25 11:03:26',NULL),(7,7284,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 14:03:37',NULL),(7,7285,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 17:51:35',NULL),(7,7291,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 14:08:04',NULL),(7,7297,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-29 14:08:34',NULL),(7,7300,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 15:12:57',NULL),(7,7303,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-26 17:52:25',NULL),(7,7309,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-24 08:52:51',NULL),(7,7310,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-23 17:21:45',NULL),(7,7311,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 21:07:21',NULL),(7,7312,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-25 11:06:30',NULL),(12,6962,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-20 14:16:34',NULL),(12,6962,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-21 07:30:19',NULL),(12,6968,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-20 15:11:21',NULL),(12,6968,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-21 07:59:53',NULL),(12,6974,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 14:26:03',NULL),(12,6974,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 14:26:53',NULL),(12,6975,3,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,'2016-03-02 16:54:45',NULL),(12,6976,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 17:26:03',NULL),(12,6977,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 17:10:18',NULL),(12,6978,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 14:50:00',NULL),(12,6979,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 08:59:01',NULL),(12,6980,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-20 16:43:08',NULL),(12,6980,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-21 08:01:32',NULL),(12,6985,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-25 10:47:28',NULL),(12,6986,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-20 17:12:20',NULL),(12,6986,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-21 08:02:14',NULL),(12,6986,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 14:58:01',NULL),(12,6992,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-23 17:51:41',NULL),(12,6998,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-21 08:27:39',NULL),(12,6998,2,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:21:50',NULL),(12,7004,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 14:31:59',NULL),(12,7005,3,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,'2016-03-02 16:53:39',NULL),(12,7006,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 17:03:36',NULL),(12,7007,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 17:08:16',NULL),(12,7008,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 16:46:02',NULL),(12,7009,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 09:06:06',NULL),(12,7010,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-21 09:49:32',NULL),(12,7015,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-25 10:42:12',NULL),(12,7016,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:25:49',NULL),(12,7016,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:03:51',NULL),(12,7022,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 13:08:13',NULL),(12,7028,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-23 14:52:41',NULL),(12,7034,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 16:50:43',NULL),(12,7035,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-20 16:09:03',NULL),(12,7036,3,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,'2016-03-02 17:02:42',NULL),(12,7037,3,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,'2016-03-02 17:09:44',NULL),(12,7038,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 16:45:27',NULL),(12,7039,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-20 17:41:57',NULL),(12,7040,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:32:17',NULL),(12,7040,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:31:33',NULL),(12,7045,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 10:37:40',NULL),(12,7046,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:34:13',NULL),(12,7046,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:07:24',NULL),(12,7052,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 13:19:41',NULL),(12,7058,2,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:36:25',NULL),(12,7058,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:57:20',NULL),(12,7064,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-23 14:48:10',NULL),(12,7065,3,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,'2016-03-02 16:52:39',NULL),(12,7066,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 21:06:27',NULL),(12,7067,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 10:57:10',NULL),(12,7068,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 17:29:52',NULL),(12,7070,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 10:07:12',NULL),(12,7075,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-25 10:33:36',NULL),(12,7076,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:38:16',NULL),(12,7076,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:31:30',NULL),(12,7082,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-23 16:25:49',NULL),(12,7088,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-04 09:12:03',NULL),(12,7094,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 16:51:52',NULL),(12,7094,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 10:37:54',NULL),(12,7095,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-20 16:19:01',NULL),(12,7096,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 17:02:00',NULL),(12,7097,3,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 17:08:59',NULL),(12,7098,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 16:54:25',NULL),(12,7099,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 09:32:57',NULL),(12,7100,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 17:25:39',NULL),(12,7105,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-25 10:25:26',NULL),(12,7106,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-25 12:25:13',NULL),(12,7106,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 17:21:17',NULL),(12,7112,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 17:11:48',NULL),(12,7118,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 17:00:05',NULL),(12,7124,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 16:48:55',NULL),(12,7125,3,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,'2016-03-02 16:51:37',NULL),(12,7126,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 17:01:15',NULL),(12,7127,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 13:03:39',NULL),(12,7128,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 16:59:15',NULL),(12,7129,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-22 09:35:08',NULL),(12,7130,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:40:17',NULL),(12,7135,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 10:17:24',NULL),(12,7136,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 16:52:29',NULL),(12,7142,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 16:53:07',NULL),(12,7148,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 16:34:47',NULL),(12,7154,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 14:14:29',NULL),(12,7155,3,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,'2016-03-02 16:50:49',NULL),(12,7156,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 16:59:55',NULL),(12,7157,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 13:17:27',NULL),(12,7158,3,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,'2016-03-02 16:43:07',NULL),(12,7159,3,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-22 09:43:02',NULL),(12,7160,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 16:19:52',NULL),(12,7165,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 10:15:14',NULL),(12,7166,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 16:07:08',NULL),(12,7166,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 16:27:51',NULL),(12,7172,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 16:00:32',NULL),(12,7178,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 19:04:53',NULL),(12,7184,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 15:43:25',NULL),(12,7185,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 16:49:39',NULL),(12,7186,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 16:59:24',NULL),(12,7187,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 13:38:36',NULL),(12,7188,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-04 09:19:02',NULL),(12,7189,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-22 09:51:16',NULL),(12,7190,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 15:38:58',NULL),(12,7195,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 10:13:23',NULL),(12,7196,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 15:25:08',NULL),(12,7196,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 15:34:19',NULL),(12,7202,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 13:11:44',NULL),(12,7208,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 16:53:38',NULL),(12,7214,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 14:59:14',NULL),(12,7215,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 16:48:43',NULL),(12,7216,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-20 13:41:25',NULL),(12,7217,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 17:10:54',NULL),(12,7218,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 16:42:20',NULL),(12,7219,3,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,'2016-02-22 09:54:24',NULL),(12,7220,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-23 18:22:05',NULL),(12,7225,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 10:08:23',NULL),(12,7226,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:41:58',NULL),(12,7226,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 16:26:31',NULL),(12,7232,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 18:32:54',NULL),(12,7233,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 10:09:07',NULL),(12,7238,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 16:54:09',NULL),(12,7244,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 16:54:41',NULL),(12,7245,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-20 17:12:13',NULL),(12,7246,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-20 14:10:00',NULL),(12,7247,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 16:07:06',NULL),(12,7248,3,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,'2016-03-02 16:41:22',NULL),(12,7249,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-22 10:07:15',NULL),(12,7250,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 18:29:18',NULL),(12,7255,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-02-25 10:13:28',NULL),(12,7256,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 13:54:25',NULL),(12,7262,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 13:39:36',NULL),(12,7268,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-01 15:45:06',NULL),(12,7268,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-19 16:02:20',NULL),(12,7274,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 14:30:45',NULL),(12,7274,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 14:31:40',NULL),(12,7275,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 16:48:07',NULL),(12,7276,3,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,'2016-03-02 16:57:31',NULL),(12,7278,3,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 16:37:07',NULL),(12,7279,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-22 10:18:45',NULL),(12,7280,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 12:21:17',NULL),(12,7285,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-25 10:07:35',NULL),(12,7286,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 18:10:49',NULL),(12,7292,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-26 13:16:37',NULL),(12,7298,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-02 10:53:51',NULL),(12,7304,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 20:20:16',NULL),(12,7305,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 16:47:17',NULL),(12,7306,3,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,'2016-03-02 16:55:50',NULL),(12,7307,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 16:17:19',NULL),(12,7308,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-02-18 16:23:20',NULL),(12,7309,3,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'2016-02-22 10:19:06',NULL),(12,7310,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'2016-01-30 19:58:52',NULL);

--
-- Table structure for table `stages`
--

CREATE TABLE `stages` (
  `ID` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `name` varchar(45) CHARACTER SET utf8 NOT NULL,
  `seqNumber` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `process` varchar(45) CHARACTER SET utf8 NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=4 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `stages`
--

INSERT INTO `stages` VALUES (1,'Systematic insertion',1,'SB'),(2,'Form field insertion',2,'SB'),(3,'Cross check',3,'SB');

--
-- Table structure for table `surveyPapers`
--

CREATE TABLE `surveyPapers` (
  `ID` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `citationsScholar` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `citationsScopus` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `citationsWoS` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `comments` text CHARACTER SET utf8,
  `abstract` text CHARACTER SET utf8,
  `numberPages` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `status` varchar(45) CHARACTER SET utf8 NOT NULL,
  `duplicated` tinyint(1) DEFAULT '0',
  `classification` text CHARACTER SET utf8 NOT NULL,
  `outOfScope` tinyint(1) DEFAULT '0',
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=7929 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `surveyPapers`
--

INSERT INTO `surveyPapers` VALUES (6960,1734,505,66,'','',12,'problems',0,'formalizations, metaStudy, implementations',0),(6961,603,306,136,'why not conflicts, scenarios, patterns?\r\nscalability tag problem','Requirements engineering is concerned with the elicitation of high-level goals to be achieved by the envisioned system, the refinement of such goals and their operationalization into specifications of services and constraints and the assignment of responsibilities for the resulting requirements to agents such as humans, devices, and software. Requirements engineering processes often result in goals, requirements, and assumptions about agent behavior that are too ideal; some of them are likely not to be satisfied from time to time in the running system due to unexpected agent behavior. The lack of anticipation of exceptional behaviors results in unrealistic, unachievable, and/or incomplete requirements. As a consequence, the software developed from those requirements will not be robust enough and will inevitably result in poor performance or failures, sometimes with critical consequences on the environment. This paper presents formal techniques for reasoning about obstacles to the satisfaction of goals, requirements, and assumptions elaborated in the requirements engineering process. A first set of techniques allows obstacles to be generated systematically from goal formulations and domain properties. A second set of techniques allows resolutions to be generated once the obstacles have been identified thereby. Our techniques are based on a temporal logic formalization of goals and domain properties; they are integrated into an existing method for goal-oriented requirements elaboration with the aim of deriving more realistic, complete, and robust requirements specifications. A key principle in this paper is to handle exceptions at requirements engineering time and at the goal level, so that more freedom is left for resolving them in a satisfactory way. The various techniques proposed are illustrated and assessed in the context of a real safety-critical system.',29,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(6962,590,265,186,'','Even though goal modeling is an effective approach to requirements engineering, it is known to present a number of difficulties in practice. The paper discusses these difficulties and proposes to couple goal modeling and scenario authoring to overcome them. Whereas existing techniques use scenarios to concretize goals, we use them to discover goals. Our proposal is to define enactable rules which form the basis of a software environment called L’Ecritoire to guide the requirements elicitation process through interleaved goal modeling and scenario authoring. The focus of the paper is on the discovery of goals from scenarios. The discovery process is centered around the notion of a requirement chunk (RC) which is a pair <Goal, Scenario>. The paper presents the notion of RC, the rules to support the discovery of RCs and illustrates the application of the approach within L’Ecritoire using the ATM example. It also evaluates the potential practical benefits expected from the use of the approach.',16,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(6963,572,235,174,'why not conflicts?\r\nwhy model-driven development? ','',6,'done',0,'proposals',0),(6964,348,161,86,'Why scalability?','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(6965,361,139,10,'Tong: \r\nWhy \"model-driven\" & \"NFR\"\r\nWhy not \"systematic reasoning\"\r\nEvellin: \r\nkept NFR, removed: MDD, add: SR','Security issues for software systems ultimately concern relationships among social actors - stakeholders, system users, potential attackers - and the software acting on their behalf. This paper proposes a methodological framework for dealing with security and privacy requirements based on i*, an agent-oriented requirements modeling language. The framework supports a set of analysis techniques. In particular, attacker analysis helps identify potential system abusers and their malicious intents. Dependency vulnerability analysis helps detect vulnerabilities in terms of organizational relationships among stakeholders. Countermeasure analysis supports the dynamic decision- making process of defensive system players in addressing vulnerabilities and threats. Finally, access control analysis bridges the gap between security requirement models and security implementation models. The framework is illustrated with an example involving security and privacy concerns in the design of agent- based health information systems. In addition, we discuss model evaluation techniques, including qualitative goal model analysis and property verification techniques based on model checking.',11,'done',0,'proposals, extensions',0),(6966,66,122,263,'Tong:\r\nTopic\r\n\"Scenario\"? if we include this topic','',26,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations',0),(6967,206,112,57,'GQM is not really goal-oriented in the sense used in GORE, however they do cite related works of the area. \r\n\r\nTong:\r\nType\r\nWhy \"Scalability\"\r\nTopic\r\nWhy not \"Systematic reasoning\"','Data warehouses are databases devoted to analytical processing. They are used to support decision-making activities in most modern business settings, when complex data sets have to be studied and analyzed. The technology for analytical processing assumes that data are presented in the form of simple data marts, consisting of a well-identified collection of facts and data analysis dimensions (star schema). Despite the wide diffusion of data warehouse technology and concepts, we still miss methods that help and guide the designer in identifying and extracting such data marts out of an enterprisewide information system, covering the upstream, requirement-driven stages of the design process. Many existing methods and tools support the activities related to the efficient implementation of data marts on top of specialized technology (such as the ROLAP or MOLAP data servers). This paper presents a method to support the identification and design of data marts. The method is based on three basic steps. A first top-down step makes it possible to elicit and consolidate user requirements and expectations. This is accomplished by exploiting a goal-oriented process based on the Goal/Question/Metric paradigm developed at the University of Maryland. Ideal data marts are derived from user requirements. The second bottom-up step extracts candidate data marts from the conceptual schema of the information system. The final step compares ideal and candidate data marts to derive a collection of data marts that are supported by the underlying information system and maximally satisfy user requirements. The method presented in this paper has been validated in a real industrial case study concerning the business processes of a large telecommunications company.',32,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(6968,254,105,-1,'Tong:\r\nWhy \"Integration\"?\r\nWhy \"Scalability\"?','',9,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(6969,151,98,53,'Tong\r\nPaper type\r\nWhy \"Case study\"\r\nWhy \"Scalability\"','',13,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations',0),(6970,373,88,NULL,'','',17,'done',0,'proposals, metaStudy',0),(6971,145,87,50,'Mattia: I do not see where it is described a tool that implements URN\r\nEvellin: section 3.3','Recognizing the need for a notation that would be used in the very first and often informal stages of the development cycle, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) initiated a question on a User Requirements Notation (URN), which will be standardized as the Z.150 series of Recommendations. URN supports the development, description, and analysis of requirements for telecommunications systems and services, as well as for other types of complex reactive, distributed, and dynamic systems. Through a wireless telephony example, this paper gives an over- view of the core elements and typical usage of the two complementary notations comprised in URN. The Goal-oriented Requirement Language (GRL) is used to describe business goals, non-functional requirements, alternatives, and ra- tionales, whereas Use Case Map (UCM) enables the description of functional requirements as causal scenarios. This paper also briefly explores methodology elements and the complementarity between URN and the existing ITU-T languages.',16,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations',0),(6972,187,86,-1,'','',4,'done',0,'proposals',0),(6973,163,84,-1,'','We present an approach that uses special purpose role-based access control (RBAC) constraints to base certain access control decisions on context information. In our approach a context constraint is defined as a dynamic RBAC constraint that checks the actual values of one or more contextual attributes for predefined conditions. If these conditions are satisfied, the corresponding access request can be permitted. Accordingly, a conditional permission is an RBAC permission that is constrained by one or more context constraints. We present an engineering process for context constraints that is based on goal-oriented requirements engineering techniques, and describe how we extended the design and implementation of an existing RBAC service to enable the enforcement of context constraints. With our approach we aim to preserve the advantages of RBAC and offer an additional means for the definition and enforcement of fine grained context-dependent access control policies.',36,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions',0),(6974,186,80,51,'why not transaction? venue type\r\n','A requirements specification defines the requirements for the future system at a conceptual level (i.e., class or type level). In contrast, a scenario represents a concrete example of current or future system usage. In early RE phases, scenarios are used to support the definition of high level requirements (goals) to be achieved by the new system. In many cases, those goals can to a large degree be elicited by observing, documenting and analyzing scenarios about current system usage, i.e., the new system must often fulfill many of the functional and nonfunctional goals of the existing system. To support the elicitation and validation of the goals achieved by the existing system and to illustrate problems of the old system, we propose to capture current system usage using rich media (e.g., video, speech, pictures, etc.) and to interrelate those observations with the goal definitions. Thus, we particularly aim at making the abstraction process which leads to the definition of the conceptual models more transparent and traceable.\r\nMore precisely, we relate the parts of the observations which have caused the definition of a goal or against which a goal was validated with the corresponding goal. These interrelations provide the basis for: 1) explaining and illustrating a goal model to, e.g., untrained stakeholders and/or new team members, and thereby improving a common understanding of the goal model; 2) detecting, analyzing, and resolving a different interpretation of the observations; 3) comparing different observations using computed goal annotations; and 4) refining or detailing a goal model during later process phases. Using the PRIME implementation framework, we have implemented the PRIME-CREWS environment, which supports the interrelation of conceptual models and captured system usage observations. We report on our experiences with PRIME-CREWS gained in a first experimental case study.',18,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(6975,157,79,43,'','',16,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(6976,113,72,32,'','',18,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(6977,137,72,39,'','Ensuring that organizational IT is in alignment with and provides support for an organization’s business strategy is critical to business success. Despite this, business strategy and strategic alignment issues are all but ignored in the requirements engineering research literature. We present B-SCP, a requirements engineering framework for organizational IT that directly addresses an organization’s business strategy and the alignment of IT requirements with that strategy. B-SCP integrates the three themes of strategy, context, and process using a requirements engineering notation for each theme. We demonstrate a means of cross-referencing and integrating the notations with each other, enabling explicit traceability between business processes and business strategy. In addition, we show a means of defining requirements problem scope as a Jackson problem diagram by applying a business modeling framework. Our approach is illustrated via application to an exemplar. The case example demonstrates the feasibility of B-SCP, and we present a comparison with other approaches.',22,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(6978,116,67,32,'','',19,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(6979,211,65,NULL,'','Goal orientation is an increasingly recognized paradigm for eliciting,\r\nmodeling, specifying and analyzing software requirements.\r\nGoals are statements of intent organized in AND/OR refinement\r\nstructures; they range from high-level, strategic concerns to lowlevel,\r\ntechnical requirements on the software-to-be and assumptions\r\non its environment. The operationalization of system goals\r\ninto specifications of software services is a core aspect of the\r\nrequirements elaboration process for which little systematic and\r\nconstructive support is available. In particular, most formal methods\r\nassume such operational specifications to be given and focus\r\non their a posteriori analysis.\r\nThe paper considers a formal, constructive approach in which\r\noperational software specifications are built incrementally from\r\nhigher-level goal formulations in a way that guarantees their correctness\r\nby construction. The operationalization process is based\r\non formal derivation rules that map goal specifications to specifications\r\nof software operations; more specifically, these rules map\r\nreal-time temporal logic specifications to sets of pre-, post- and\r\ntrigger conditions. The rules define operationalization patterns that\r\nmay be used for guiding and documenting the operationalization\r\nprocess while hiding all formal reasoning details; the patterns are\r\nformally proved correct once and for all. The catalog of operationalization\r\npatterns is structured according to a rich taxonomy of\r\ngoal specification patterns.\r\nOur constructive approach to requirements elaboration requires a\r\nmultiparadigm specification language that supports incremental\r\nreasoning about partial models. The paper also provides a formal\r\nsemantics for goal operationalization and discusses several semantic\r\nfeatures of our language that allow for such incremental reasoning.',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations',0),(6980,121,64,41,'','',16,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(6981,119,63,28,'juCMNav is the toolset, GRL should be the framework!\r\n\r\nFormalization','',36,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations',0),(6982,202,63,58,'','',19,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations',0),(6983,218,59,NULL,'','The software industry is more than ever facing the\r\nchallenge of delivering WYGIWYW software (What You\r\nGet Is What You Want). A well-structured document\r\nspecifying adequate, complete, consistent, precise, and\r\nmeasurable requirements is a critical prerequisite for\r\nsuch software. Goals have been recognized to be among\r\nthe driving forces for requirements elicitation,\r\nelaboration, organization, analysis, negotiation,\r\ndocumentation, and evolution.\r\nGrowing experience with goal-oriented requirements\r\nengineering suggests synergistic links between research\r\nin this area and good practice. We discuss one journey\r\nalong this road from influencing ideas and research\r\nresults to tool developments to good practice in industrial\r\nprojects. On the way, we discuss some lessons learnt,\r\nobstacles to technonogy transfer, and challenges for\r\nbetter requirements engineering research and practice',3,'done',0,'metaStudy',0),(6984,182,59,16,'','This paper presents an extended version of Goal-\r\nOriented Requirements Analysis Method called AGORA,\r\nwhere attribute values, e.g. contribution values and preference\r\nmatrices, are added to goal graphs. An analyst attaches\r\ncontribution values and preference values to edges\r\nand nodes of a goal graph respectively during the process\r\nfor refining and decomposing the goals. The contribution\r\nvalue of an edge stands for the degree of the contribution\r\nof the sub-goal to the achievement of its parent goal, while\r\nthe preference matrix of a goal represents the preference of\r\nthe goal for each stakeholder. These values can help an analyst\r\nto choose and adopt a goal from the alternatives of\r\nthe goals, to recognize the conflicts among the goals, and to\r\nanalyze the impact of requirements changes. Furthermore\r\nthe values on a goal graph and its structural characteristics\r\nallow the analyst to estimate the quality of the resulting requirements\r\nspecification, such as correctness, unambiguity,\r\ncompleteness etc. The estimated quality values can suggest\r\nto him which goals should be improved and/or refined. In\r\naddition, we have applied AGORA to a user account system\r\nand assessed it.',10,'done',0,'proposals, extensions',0),(6985,123,57,NULL,'','Self-adaptation is imposing as a key characteristic\r\nof many modern software systems to tackle their complexity\r\nand cope with the many environments in which they can\r\noperate. Self-adaptation is a requirement per-se, but it also\r\nimpacts the other (conventional) requirements of the system;\r\nall these new and old requirements must be elicited and\r\nrepresented in a coherent and homogenous way. This paper\r\npresents FLAGS, an innovative goal model that generalizes\r\nthe KAOS model, adds adaptive goals to embed adaptation\r\ncountermeasures, and fosters self-adaptation by considering\r\nrequirements as live, runtime entities. FLAGS also distinguishes\r\nbetween crisp goals, whose satisfaction is boolean, and fuzzy\r\ngoals, whose satisfaction is represented through fuzzy constraints.\r\nAdaptation countermeasures are triggered by violated\r\ngoals and the goal model is modified accordingly to maintain a\r\ncoherent view of the system and enforce adaptation directives\r\non the running system. The main elements of the approach are\r\ndemonstrated through an example application.',9,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(6986,93,56,33,'','A number of recent initiatives in both academia and industry have sought to achieve improvements in e-businesses through the utilization of Business Process Management (BPM) methodologies and tools. However there are still some inade- quacies that need to be addressed when it comes to achieving alignment between business goals and business processes. The User Requirements Notation (URN), re- cently standardized by ITU-T, has some unique features and capabilities beyond what is available in other notations that can help address alignment issues. In this paper, a URN-based framework and its supporting toolset are introduced which provide busi- ness process monitoring and performance management capabilities integrated across the BPM lifecycle. The framework extends the URN notation with Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and other concepts to measure and align processes and goals. An example process for controlling access to a healthcare data warehouse is used to illus- trate and evaluate the framework. Early results indicate the feasibility of the approach.',47,'notDone',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(6987,190,56,8,'','',9,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations',0),(6988,84,53,9,'','',NULL,'problems',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(6989,103,52,20,'','Legal texts, such as regulations and legislation, are playing an increasingly important role in requirements engineering and system development. Monitoring systems for requirements and policy compliance has been recognized in the requirements engineering community as a key area for research. Similarly, regulatory compliance is critical in systems that are governed by regulations and law, especially given that non-compliance can result in both financial and criminal penalties. Working with legal texts can be very challenging, however, because they contain numerous ambiguities, cross-references, domain-specific definitions, and acronyms, and are frequently amended via new regulations and case law. Requirements engineers and compliance auditors must be able to identify relevant regulations, extract requirements and other key concepts, and monitor compliance throughout the software lifecycle. This paper surveys research efforts over the past 50 years in handling legal texts for systems development. These efforts include the use of symbolic logic, logic programming, first-order temporal logic, deontic logic, defeasible logic, goal modeling, and semi-structured representations. This survey can aid requirements engineers and auditors to better specify, monitor, and test software systems for compliance.',9,'done',0,'metaStudy',0),(6990,NULL,51,NULL,'','',12,'notDone',0,'',1),(6991,136,49,NULL,'','This paper presents an approach that uses special purpose\r\nRBAC constraints to base certain access control decisions on\r\ncontext information. In our approach a context constraint\r\nis defined as a dynamic RBAC constraint that checks the\r\nactual values of one or more contextual attributes for pre-\r\ndefined conditions. If these conditions are satisfied, the cor-\r\nresponding access request can be permitted. Accordingly, a\r\nconditional permission is an RBAC permission which is con-\r\nstrained by one or more context constraints. We present an\r\nengineering process for context constraints, that is based on\r\ngoal-oriented requirements engineering techniques, and de-\r\nscribe how we extended the design and implementation of an\r\nexisting RBAC service to enable the enforcement of context\r\nconstraints. With our approach we aim to preserve the ad-\r\nvantages of RBAC, and offer an additional means for the def-\r\ninition and enforcement of fine-grained context-dependent\r\naccess control policies.',15,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions',0),(6992,NULL,47,NULL,'Out of scope because it is a book.','',477,'notDone',0,'',1),(6993,82,46,-1,'why not: scenarios, softgoals, compliance, patterns, agents, aspects, conflicts?','',21,'done',0,'metaStudy',0),(6994,90,46,28,'This paper talks about the concept \"goal\" in self-regulated learning, but does not model nor analyze goals ','',13,'done',0,'',1),(6995,77,45,24,'Tong:\r\nPaper type:\r\nWhy \"case study\"?\r\nWhy \"scalability\"?\r\nTopic:\r\nWhy \"conflict\"?\r\nWhy not \"actor\"\r\n\r\nEvellin: removed scalability (bug), CS, added: actor, kept: conflict\r\n','Methods for enterprise architecture, such as TOGAF, acknowledge the importance of requirements modelling in the development of enterprise architectures. Modelling support is needed to specify, document, communicate and reason about goals and requirements. Current modelling techniques for enterprise architecture focus on the products, services, processes and applications of an enterprise. In addition, techniques may be provided to describe structured requirements lists and use cases. Little support is available however for modelling the underlying motivation of enterprise architectures in terms of stakeholder concerns and the high-level goals that address these concerns. This paper describes a language that supports the modelling of this motivation. The definition of the language is based on existing work on high-level goal and requirements modelling and is aligned with an existing standard for enterprise modelling: the ArchiMate language. Furthermore, the paper illustrates how enterprise architecture can benefit from analysis techniques from the requirements engineering domain.',28,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions, applications',0),(6996,72,43,17,'Tong:\r\nTopic\r\n\"conflicts\"? As they do model conflicts and require analysts to solve conflicts manually.','',22,'done',0,'proposals, extensions',0),(6997,63,42,16,'','Goal-oriented modelling is one of the most\r\nimportant research developments in the requirements\r\nengineering (RE) field. This paper conducts a systematic\r\nanalysis of the visual syntax of i*, one of the leading goaloriented\r\nlanguages. Like most RE notations, i* is highly\r\nvisual. Yet surprisingly, there has been little debate about\r\nor modification to its graphical conventions since it was\r\nproposed more than a decade ago. We evaluate the i*\r\nvisual notation using a set of principles for designing\r\ncognitively effective visual notations (the Physics of\r\nNotations). The analysis reveals some serious flaws in the\r\nnotation together with some practical recommendations for\r\nimprovement. The results can be used to improve its\r\neffectiveness in practice, particularly for communicating\r\nwith end users. A broader goal of the paper is to raise awareness about the importance of visual representation in\r\nRE research, which has historically received little attention.',35,'done',0,'proposals, evalBenchmark',0),(6998,80,42,14,'Do we keep the abbreviation of the conference in the venue?','Methods for enterprise architecture, such as TOGAF, acknowledge the importance of requirements engineering in the development of enterprise architectures. Modelling support is needed to specify, document, communicate and reason about goals and requirements. Current modelling techniques for enterprise architecture focus on the products, services, processes and applications of an enterprise. In addition, techniques may be provided to describe structured requirements lists and use cases. Little support is available however for modelling the underlying motivation of enterprise architectures in terms of stakeholder concerns and the high-level goals that address these concerns. This paper describes a language that supports the modelling of this motivation. The definition of the language is based on existing work on high-level goal and requirements modelling and is aligned with an existing standard for enterprise modelling: the ArchiMate language. Furthermore, the paper illustrates how enterprise architecture can benefit from analysis techniques in the requirements domain.',11,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions',0),(6999,124,38,45,'Tong\r\nWhy not \"Business Modeling\"?','',16,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions',0),(7000,70,37,17,'','',31,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7001,91,37,-1,'','Models are increasingly recognized as an effective means for elaborating requirements and exploring designs. For complex systems, model building is far from an easy task. Efforts were therefore recently made to automate parts of this process, notably, by synthesizing behavior models from scenarios of interactions between the software-to-be and its environment. In particular, our previous interactive synthesizer generates labelled transition systems (LTS) from simple message sequence charts (MSC) provided by end-users. Compared with others, the synthesizer requires no additional input such as state or flowcharting information. User interactions consist in simple scenarios generated by the synthesizer that the user has to classify as example or counterexample of desired behavior.\r\nExperience with this approach showed that the number of such scenario questions may become fairly large in interaction-intensive applications such as web applications. In this paper, we extend our model synthesis technique by injecting additional information into the synthesizer, when available, in order to constrain induction and prune the inductive search space. Additional information may include global definitions of fluents that link interaction events and atomic assertions; declarative properties of the domain; behavior models of external components; and goals that the software system is expected to satisfy. We provide comparative data on increasingly complex examples to show how effective such constraints are in reducing the number of scenario questions and in increasing the adequacy of the synthesized model. As goals and domain properties might not be easily provided by users, the paper also shows how our synthesizer generates a significant class of them automatically from the available scenarios. As a side-effect, our work provides additional evidence on the synergistic links between scenarios, goals, and state machines for model-driven engineering of requirements and designs.',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7002,52,35,15,'','',32,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7003,155,33,2,'','Goal orientation is an increasingly recognized paradigm\r\nfor eliciting, structuring, analyzing and documenting system\r\nrequirements. Goals are statements of intent ranging\r\nfrom high-level, strategic concerns to low-level, technical\r\nrequirements on the software-to-be and assumptions on its\r\nenvironment. Achieving goals require the cooperation of\r\nagents such as software components, input/output devices\r\nand human agents. The assignment of responsibilities for\r\ngoals to agents is a critical decision in the requirements\r\nengineering process as alternative agent assignments\r\ndefine alternative system proposals.\r\nThe paper describes a systematic technique to support the\r\nprocess of refining goals, identifying agents, and exploring\r\nalternative responsibility assignments. The underlying\r\nprinciples are to refine goals until they are assignable to\r\nsingle agents, and to assign a goal to an agent only if the\r\nagent can realize the goal.\r\nThere are various reasons why a goal may not be realizable\r\nby an agent, e.g., the goal may refer to variables that\r\nare not monitorable or controllable by the agent. The\r\nnotion of goal realizability is first defined on formal\r\ngrounds; it provides a basis for identifying a complete taxonomy\r\nof realizability problems. From this taxonomy we\r\nsystematically derive a catalog of tactics for refining goals\r\nand identifying agents so as to resolve realizability problems.\r\nEach tactics corresponds to the application of a formal\r\nrefinement pattern that relieves the specifier from\r\nverifying the correctness of refinements in temporal logic.\r\nOur techniques have been used in two case studies of significant\r\nsize; excerpts are shown to illustrate the main\r\nideas.',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7004,60,33,22,'i do not think the framework is HTA, since they said it has been proposed in [19]','Recently, the role of task analysis in design has been brought into question. It has been argued, for example, that task analysis leads to the non-creative redesign of existing artefacts. In this paper. we offer a view of task analysis that resolves this problem. In particular, we argue that by focusing upon the analysis of user/operator goals rather than an existing task implementation, task analysis encourages novel and apt design. A reformulation of hierarchical task analysis is offered, based on the sub-goal template (SGT) scheme. The SGT scheme provides a notation for goal-oriented task analysis and defines an appropriate level at which task analyses can inform the design process without constraining it to existing task implementations. The SGT scheme is compared with the systems analysis-based design methodology SSADM and the advantages of each approach are reviewed. ',17,'done',0,'proposals',0),(7005,141,31,24,'','',15,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy, applications',0),(7006,111,31,3,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7007,65,30,13,'','Goal-oriented methods have increasingly been recognised as an effective means for eliciting, elaborating, analysing and specifying software requirements. A key activity in these approaches is the elaboration of a correct and complete set of opertional requirements, in the form of pre- and trigger-conditions, that guarantee the system goals. Few existing approaches provide support for this crucial task and mainly rely on significant effort and expertise of the engineer.\r\nIn this paper we propose a tool-based framework that combines model checking, inductive learning and scenarios for elaborating operational requirements from goal models. This is an iterative process that requires the engineer to identify positive and negative scenarios from counterexamples to the goals, generated using model checking, and to select operational requirements from suggestions computed by inductive learning.',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7008,55,30,18,'','',24,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalBenchmark',0),(7009,151,30,25,'','Goal models have been used in Computer Science in order to represent\r\nsoftware requirements, business objectives and design qualities. In previous\r\nwork we have presented a formal framework for reasoning with goal models, in a\r\nqualitative or quantitative way, and we have introduced an algorithm for forward\r\npropagating values through goal models. In this paper we focus on the qualitative\r\nframework and we propose a technique and an implemented tool for addressing\r\ntwo much more challenging problems: (1) find an initial assignment of labels\r\nto leaf goals which satisfies a desired final status of root goals by upward value\r\npropagation, while respecting some given constraints; and (2) find an minimum\r\ncost assignment of labels to leaf goals which satisfies root goals. The paper also\r\npresents preliminary experimental results on the performance of the tool using the\r\ngoal graph generated by a case study involving the Public Transportation Service\r\nof Trentino (Italy).',15,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7010,44,30,NULL,'','',43,'notDone',0,'',1),(7011,NULL,30,NULL,'','',16,'notDone',0,'',1),(7012,85,29,NULL,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, interpretations',0),(7013,41,28,-1,'','This article describes a work-in-progress in the framework of a research project aiming at combining require- ments engineering methods with formal methods. The main idea is to extend the SysML language with concepts of existing requirements engineering methods. In this article we present extensions to SysML with concepts from the goal model of the KAOS method and we give rules to derive a formal B specification from this goal model. The approach is then illustrated on a case study.',7,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7014,58,27,7,'','A socio-technical system (STS) consists of an\r\ninterplay of humans, organizations, and technical systems.\r\nSTSs are heterogeneous, dynamic, unpredictable, and\r\nweakly controllable. Their operational environment changes\r\nunexpectedly, actors join and leave the system at will,\r\nactors fail to meet their objectives and under-perform, and\r\ndependencies on other actors are violated. To deal with\r\nsuch situations, we propose an architecture for STSs that\r\nmakes an STS self-reconfigurable, i.e., capable of switching\r\nautonomously from one configuration to a better one.\r\nOur architecture performs a Monitor-Diagnose-Reconcile-\r\nCompensate cycle: it monitors actor behaviors and context\r\nchanges, diagnoses failures and under-performance by\r\nchecking whether monitored behavior is compliant with\r\nactors goals, finds a possible way to address the problem,\r\nand enacts compensation actions to reconcile actual and\r\ndesired behavior. Compensation actions take into account\r\nthe autonomy of participants in an STS, which cannot be\r\ncontrolled. Our architecture is requirements driven: we use\r\nextended Tropos goal models to diagnose failures as well\r\nas to identify alternative strategies to meet requirements.\r\nAfter presenting our conceptual architecture and the algorithms,\r\nit is founded upon; we describe a prototype\r\nimplementation applied to a case study concerning smarthomes.\r\nWe also provide experimental results that suggest that our architecture scales well as the size of the STS\r\ngrows.',24,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7015,57,27,NULL,'','Requirements can differ in their importance. As\r\nsuch the priorities that stakeholders associate with requirements\r\nmay vary from stakeholder to stakeholder and from\r\none situation to the next. Differing priorities, in turn, imply\r\ndifferent design decisions for the end system. While elicitation\r\nof requirements priorities is a well studied activity, though,\r\nthe modeling and reasoning side of prioritization has not\r\nenjoyed equal attention. In this paper, we address this by\r\nextending a traditional goal modeling notation to support the\r\nrepresentation of optional and preference requirements. In our\r\nextension, optional goals are distinguished from mandatory\r\nones. Then, quantitative prioritizations of the former are\r\nconstructed and used as criteria for evaluating alternative\r\nways to achieve the latter. A state-of-the-art preference-based\r\nplanner is utilized to efficiently search for alternatives that best\r\nsatisfy the given preferences. This way, analysts can acquire\r\na better understanding of the impact of high-level stakeholder\r\npreferences to low-level design decisions.',9,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions',0),(7016,66,27,9,'doubts: systematic reasoning as a topic?\r\nJH: I guess yes, hard to say.','Goal models are effective in capturing stakeholder needs at the time when features of the system-to-be have not yet been conceptual- ized. Relating goals to solution-oriented features gives rise to a requirement traceability problem. In this paper, we present a new model-driven extension to an Early Requirements Engineering tool (OpenOME) that generates an initial feature model of the system- to-be from stakeholder goals. Enabled by such generative map- ping, configuration constraints among variability features can be obtained by reasoning about stakeholder goals.',4,'problems',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions',0),(7017,NULL,27,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7018,41,27,2,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability, applications',0),(7019,81,27,3,'','One of the benefits of goal-oriented requirements engineering is the possibility of conducting formal analysis in order to evaluate alternative solutions of goal models. Superficially, goal analysis seems like an optimization technique. In contrast to such techniques, however, goal analysis does not aim at optimal solutions, but rather “good enoughâ€ ones [17]. Moreover, goal analysis has to blend quantitative with qualitative techniques to account for subject matters that are not readily quantifiable. The analysis of the interplay of non-functional softgoals and functional goals at a high level of abstraction is an important element of goal analysis for the requirements engineer, especially so when dealing with requirements variability. This paper proposes a visual variability analysis technique and describes an implemented tool that supports it.',9,'problems',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, evalBenchmark',0),(7020,75,26,5,'','',9,'problems',0,'',1),(7021,64,25,7,'','Risk analysis is traditionally considered a critical\r\nactivity for the whole software system’s lifecycle.\r\nRisks are identified by considering technical aspects (e.g.,\r\nfailures of the system, unavailability of services, etc.) and\r\nhandled by suitable countermeasures through a refined\r\ndesign. This, however, introduces the problem of reconsidering\r\nsystem requirements. In this paper, we propose a\r\ngoal-oriented approach for analyzing risks during the\r\nrequirements analysis phase. Risks are analyzed along with\r\nstakeholder interests, and then countermeasures are identified\r\nand introduced as part of the system’s requirements.\r\nThis work extends the Tropos goal modeling formal\r\nframework proposing new concepts, qualitative reasoning\r\ntechniques, and methodological procedures. The approach\r\nis based on a conceptual framework composed of three\r\nmain layers: assets, events, and treatments. We use ‘‘loan\r\norigination process’’ case study to illustrate the proposal,\r\nand we present and discuss experimental results obtained\r\nfrom the case study.',15,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7022,34,25,2,'Why early RE?','Goal-oriented and agent-oriented modelling provides an effective approach to the understanding of distributed information systems that need to operate in open, heterogeneous and evolving environments. Frameworks, firstly introduced more than ten years ago, have been extended along language variants, analysis methods and CASE tools, posing language semantics and tool interoperability issues. Among them, the i* framework is one the most widespread. We focus on i*-based modelling languages and tools and on the problem of supporting model exchange between them. In this paper, we introduce the i* interoperability problem and derive an XML interchange format, called iStarML, as a practical solution to this problem. We first discuss the main requirements for its definition, then we characterise the core concepts of i* and we detail the tags and options of the interchange format. We complete the presentation of iStarML showing some possible applications. Finally, a survey on the i* community perception about iStarML is included for assessment purposes.',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, evalSurvey',0),(7023,104,25,-1,'why not systematic reasoning, architecture, early RE, metric?','',NULL,'done',0,'proposals, extensions',0),(7024,146,25,2,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations',0),(7025,52,25,-1,'Why not conflict?','The concept of goal has been used in many domains such as management sciences and strategic planning, artificial intelligence and human computer interaction. Recently, goal-driven approaches have been developed and tried out to support requirements engineering activities such as requirements elicitation, specification, validation, modification, structuring and negotiation. This chapter first review various research efforts undertaken in this line of research and presents the state-of-the-art in using goals to engineer requirements. It then presents a particular goal model, the goal/strategy map, and shows that maps can help with facing the challenge of new emerging multi-purposes systems, i.e. systems imposing variability in requirements elaboration and customization in the requirements engineering process.',29,'notDone',0,'metaStudy',0),(7026,77,25,-1,'Tong:\r\nWhy this paper is out?\r\nIn now','',8,'done',0,'proposals, metaStudy, implementations, integrations',0),(7027,54,24,NULL,'Paper not found\r\n\r\nThis paper present \"a framework for selecting requirements engineering techniques\", where goal modeling techniques are only instances of such techniques. I think this paper should be out.','One of the most difficult jobs for requirements engineers is to select an appropriate RE method for the project at hand. Good engineers make good choices and have skills in applying selected techniques appropriately. Poor engineers usually have a narrow choice range limited by their training and biased by their experience. Once a RE technique that does not fit the current project is selected, the project is doomed to fail. In this article, we propose a framework to characterize typical RE techniques and use it as a base for selecting appropriate techniques at the time a project is started, as well as at the time a change in the nature of the project is recognized, or an obstacle is encountered in defining a suitable set of requirements. ',15,'notDone',0,'proposals',1),(7028,NULL,24,NULL,'','',25,'notDone',0,'',1),(7029,48,24,18,'Tong\r\nShould this paper be in?\r\nI provide the initial list of paper types and topics as below','',27,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy',1),(7030,35,23,NULL,'why security? the example is about security, but the paper is general','',10,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7031,65,23,10,'','Strategic reasoning about business models is an integral part of service design. In fast moving markets, businesses must be able to recognize and respond strategically to disruptive change. They have to answer questions such as: what are the threats and opportunities in emerging technologies and innovations? How should they target customer groups? Who are their real competitors? How will competitive battles take shape? In this paper we define a strategic modeling framework to help understand and analyze the goals, intentions, roles, and the rationale behind the strategic actions in a business environment. This understanding is necessary in order to improve existing or design new services. The key component of the framework is a strategic business model ontology for representing and analyzing business models and strategies, using the i* agent and goal oriented methodology as a basis. The ontology introduces a strategy layer which reasons about alternative strategies that are realized in the operational layer. The framework is evaluated using a retroactive example of disruptive technology in the telecom- munication services sector from the literature.',27,'done',0,'proposals, extensions, evalBenchmark',0),(7032,43,23,12,'','',17,'done',0,'proposals, evalCaseStudy',0),(7033,34,23,15,'','',32,'done',0,'',1),(7034,36,22,10,'why not SOTA as framework?','',5,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations',1),(7035,38,22,12,'','',22,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7036,75,22,2,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7037,54,21,16,'','',24,'problems',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7038,79,21,2,'','',11,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, interpretations',0),(7039,NULL,20,NULL,'','',9,'notDone',0,'',1),(7040,64,19,-1,'This is an essay in a chapter dedicated to John. I have doubts about the venue. \r\nAlso KAOS graphical notation is used but it does not say it extedns KAOS anywhere. is the framework KAOS?','',17,'done',0,'proposals, metaStudy',0),(7041,51,19,5,'','',9,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7042,74,19,2,'','',11,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions',0),(7043,152,19,18,'','Over the past decade, goal models have been used in Computer Science in order to represent software requirements, business objectives and design qualities. Such models extend traditional AI planning techniques for representing goals by allowing for partially defined and possibly inconsistent goals. This paper presents a formal framework for reasoning with such goal models. In particular, the paper proposes a qualitative and a numerical axiomatization for goal modeling primi- tives and introduces label propagation algorithms that are shown to be sound and complete with respect to their respective axiomatizations. In addition, the paper reports on experimental results on the propagation algorithms applied to a goal model for a US car manufacturer.',19,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7044,35,18,9,'','It is widely accepted that sustaining Business and Information\r\nTechnology (IT) alignment is a complex task, due to the lack of\r\nappropriate alignment methodologies, rapid changes in running\r\nbusiness processes and insufficient IT techniques to cope with\r\nsuch changes. One way of achieving successful alignment is the\r\ndevelopment of an IT system which meets business expectations.\r\nThis is only possible if IT analysts take the organizational\r\nenvironment into account prior to implementing the system.\r\nThis paper presents an organizational goal-oriented requirements\r\nelicitation approach which will allow the IT department to better\r\nunderstand the business goals of the organization to enable them\r\nto develop an IT system which will meet business expectations.\r\nIt also describes what kind of goal modelling and human input\r\nis required in order to implement the \"automatic modelling IT\r\ninfrastructure\" methodology. A process of order management in\r\nan automobile company has been used as a case study to validate\r\nthe approach.',8,'done',0,'proposals, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7045,NULL,18,NULL,'','',9,'notDone',0,'',1),(7046,52,18,6,'My doubts about topics is that this paper proposas ways to represents softgoals actors etc, does this make it about these topics?  JH: yes','',9,'problems',0,'proposals, integrations, interpretations',0),(7047,31,18,9,'','',9,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7048,21,18,NULL,'This paper does not really model nor analyze goals, just mentions this concept.\r\n','',20,'done',0,'',1),(7049,101,18,14,'','The development of a data warehouse has been traditionally guided by an in-depth analysis of the underlying operational datasources, thus overlooking an explicit development phase in which information requirements of decision makers are addressed. This scenario hasprompted that the deployed data warehouse often fails in delivering the expected support of the decision making process. To overcome this problem, we propose to use the i* modeling framework and themodel drivenarchitecture(MDA) in order to describe (i) how to model goals and information requirements for data warehouses, and (ii) how to derive aconceptual multidimensional model that provides the required information to support the decision making process.',9,'problems',0,'',1),(7050,NULL,18,NULL,'','',14,'notDone',0,'',1),(7051,119,18,NULL,'The work is part of the Lightswitch framework. ','Goal is a widely used concept in requirements\r\nengineering methods. Several kinds of goals, such as\r\nachievement, maintenance and soft goals, have been\r\ndefined in these methods. These methods also define\r\nheuristics for the identification of organizational goals\r\nthat drive the requirements process. In this paper we\r\npropose a set of principles that explain the nature of\r\ngoal-oriented behavior. These principles are based on\r\nregulation mechanisms as defined in General Systems\r\nThinking and Cybernetics. We use these principles to\r\nanalyze the existing definitions of these different kinds\r\nof goals and to propose more precise definitions. We\r\nestablish the commonalities and differences between\r\nthese kinds of goals, and propose extension for goal\r\nidentification heuristics.',10,'done',0,'metaStudy',0),(7052,39,18,13,'',' In this chapter we discuss the current trends and challenges that arise in the COTS-based requirements engineering. When acquiring COTS products, customers are put into unexpected situations over which they have no control. Therefore, requirements have to be more flexible in order to meet the products constraints. We point out the main research efforts that have been done to support the COTS-based requirements process and discuss the advantages and drawbacks of each proposal. We argue that the matching process between products’ features and users requirements is a fundamental issue to be treated during the evaluation process. In this context, we propose a goal-oriented approach to identify mismatches and deal with conflicts.',18,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations',0),(7053,35,17,NULL,'','',9,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations',0),(7054,24,17,10,'','',15,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7055,186,17,21,'Tong:\r\nwhy \"formalization\"','Agent-oriented system development aims  to simplify the construction of complex systems by introducing a natural abstraction layer on top of the object-oriented paradigm composed of autonomous interacting actors. One main advantage of the agent metaphor is that an agent can be described similar to the characteristics of the human mind consisting of several interrelated concepts which constitute the internal agent structure. General consensus exists that the Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) model is well suited for describing an agent’s mental state. The desires (goals) of an agent represent its motivational stance and are the main source for the agent’s actions. Therefore, the representation and handling of goals play a central role in goal-oriented requirements analysis and modelling techniques. Nevertheless, currently available BDI agent platforms mostly abstract from goals and do not represent them explicitly. This leads to a gap between design and implementation with respect to the available concepts. In this paper a generic representation of goal types, properties, and lifecycles is developed in consideration of existing goal-oriented requirements engineering and modelling techniques. The objective of this proposal is to bridge the gap between agent specification and implementation of goals and is backed by experiences gained from developing a generic agent framework.',22,'done',0,'proposals, implementations',0),(7056,65,17,2,'','',11,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations',0),(7057,NULL,16,NULL,'','',7,'notDone',0,'',1),(7058,32,16,-1,'URN,GRL','',46,'notDone',0,'metaStudy, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7059,28,16,5,'Tong\r\nWhy not \"Variability\"\r\nWhy not \"Aspect\"','',11,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7060,42,15,NULL,'','',15,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7061,75,15,12,'why formalization?: ok','Software requirements consist of functionalities and qualities to be accommodated during design. Through goal-oriented requirements engineering, stakeholder goals are refined into a space of alternative functionalities. We adopt this framework and propose a decision-making process to generate a generic soft- ware design that can accommodate the full space of alternatives each of which can fulfill stakeholder goals. Specifically, we present a process for generating complementary design views from a goal model with high variability in configurations, behavioral specifications, architectures and business processes.',15,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7062,38,15,7,'','',14,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalSurvey, evalCaseStudy',0),(7063,31,14,7,'','The \"motivation domain\" of an Enterprise Architecture addresses objectives in a broad scope ranging from high-level statements expressing the goals of an enterprise to declarations of requirements on business processes, services and systems. An important development regarding the incorporation of the motivation domain in a comprehensive Enterprise Architecture modeling language is the upcoming Motivational Extension to ArchiMate (based on the ARMOR language). The extension proposes the inclusion of concepts such as concerns, assessments, goals, principles and requirements to ArchiMate. We believe that careful definition of the semantics of these concepts is required, especially when considering that the motivation domain addresses subjective aspects of the enterprise. To address that, this paper focuses on an ontology-based semantics for the Motivation Extension. We interpret the concepts by using the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) as a semantic domain, and, as a result, propose well-founded recommendations for improvements of the extension.',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations',0),(7064,31,14,-1,'why systematic reasoning?\r\nwhy conflicts?','',7,'done',0,'proposals, metaStudy, evalCaseStudy',0),(7065,24,14,7,'','',19,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7066,23,14,NULL,'','',7,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, extensions',0),(7067,NULL,14,NULL,'','',NULL,'notDone',0,'',1),(7068,NULL,14,NULL,'','',10,'notDone',0,'',1),(7069,49,14,NULL,'','Our world is increasingly relying on complex software and systems. In a growing number of fields such as transportation, finance, telecommunications, medical devices, they come to play a critical role and require high assurance. To achieve this, it is imperative to produce high quality requirements. The KAOS goal-oriented requirements engineering methodology provides a rich framework for requirements elicitation and management of such systems. This paper demonstrates the practical industrial application of that methodology. The non-critical parts are modelled semi-formally using a graphical language for goal-oriented requirements engineering. When and where needed (ie. for critical parts of a system) the model can be specified at formal level using a real-time temporal logic. That formal level seamlessly extends the semi-formal level which can also help hide the formality for the non-specialist. To ensure at an early stage that the right system is being built and that the requirements model is right, validation and verification tools are applied on that model. Early verification checks help to discover missing requirements, overlooked assumptions or incorrect goal refinements. State machines generation from operations provides an executable model useful for validation purposes or for deriving an initial design. Acceptance test cases and runtime behavior monitors can also be derived from the model. The process is supported by an integrated toolbox implementing the above tools by a roundtrip mapping of KAOS requirements level notations to the languages of formal technology tools such as model-checkers, SAT engines or constraint solvers. A graphical visualization framework also significantly helps validation using domain-based representations.',14,'problems',0,'formalizations, implementations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7070,26,14,6,'','',27,'done',0,'proposals, evalSurvey',0),(7071,57,14,NULL,'','',9,'done',0,'proposals, integrations',0),(7072,21,14,4,'This paper talks about organizational control system model, which takes a \"goal-oriented\" view but  does not deal with requirements at all. ','',12,'done',0,'proposals',1),(7073,33,13,7,'','Goal-oriented requirements engineering (GORE) has been introduced as a means of modeling and understanding the motivations for system requirements. Using models to make goals explicit helps to avoid system failures due to implementing the wrong requirements or ignoring certain stakeholder needs. These models are unique when compared to other models used in system analysis in that their structure naturally lends itself to an analysis of goal satisfaction. Existing work claims that analysis using goal models can facilitate decision making over functional or design alternatives, using criteria in the model. Many different approaches to the analysis of goal- oriented requirements models have been proposed, including several procedures that analyze the satisfaction or denial of goals. These procedures make different choices in their interpretation of the goal model syntax, the methods to resolve conflicting or partial evidence, and in the way they represent satisfaction. This work uses three available tools implementing seven similar goal satisfaction analysis procedures to analyze three sample goal models. Results are reported and compared. The purpose of this comparison is to understand the ways in which procedural design choices affect analysis results, and how differences in analysis results could lead to different recommendations over alternatives in the model. Our comparison shows that different satisfaction analysis techniques for goal models can produce variable results, depending on the structure of the model. Comparison findings lead us to recommend the use of satisfaction analysis techniques for goal models as only heuristics for decision making. Our results emphasize investigation into the benefits of satisfaction analysis beyond decision making, namely improving model quality, increasing domain knowledge, and facilitating communication.',23,'done',0,'formalizations, metaStudy',0),(7074,19,13,6,'','',22,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7075,23,13,NULL,'The process','Architectural design is an important activity, but the understanding of how it is related to requirements modeling is rather limited. It is worth noting that goal orientation is an increasingly recognized paradigm for eliciting, modeling, specifying, and analyzing software requirements. However, it is not clear how goal models are related to architectural models. In this paper we present an approach based on model\r\ntransformations to derive architectural structural specifications from system goals. The source and target languages are respectively the i* (iStar) modeling language and the Acme architectural description\r\nlanguage. A real case study is used to show the feasibility of our approach.',16,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7076,28,13,NULL,'framework is gRL and NFR. Should I consider GRL as a framework?  \r\nJH: yes','In the past, IT system design is mainly driven by two essential factors: technical merits and costs. Environmental consideration only emerges in most recent discussions under the label of green IT. As the evaluation of environmental and climate impact involves too many parameters, some of which are indirect and hidden, it is very hard to make rationale anal- ysis without the support of a holistic strategic analysis framework. In this paper, we pro- pose to extend the goal-oriented requirements modeling language, GRL, to model the rationality behind IT system design, in particular, how the environment related consider- ations come into play in such design decision making. It can be adopted as a strategic anal- ysis framework to facilitate concrete decision makings under different environmental settings. Example real world scenarios are used to illustrate how the proposed approach can help improve the state of the practice.',15,'done',0,'proposals, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7077,42,13,13,'','',15,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7078,43,13,5,'This approach proposes a general core requirements metamodel, and illustrated the proposal using a SysML. Although the paper mention, it is possible to map the metamodel to goal model, but it did nothing about that.\r\n','',16,'done',0,'',1),(7079,32,13,4,'','This paper proposes Persona-Scenario-Goal (PSG) methodology as an extension of Persona-Scenario methodology, and its empirical study in the usercentered requirements engineering for a Web application system. The Persona-Scenario methodology demonstrated the effectiveness in capturing requirements of consumer products, such as mobile phones. However, the methodology has limitations to evaluate the multiple, possibly conflicting, requirements. The PSG methodology intended to identify a set of value requirements from multiple and even conflicting requirements by combining persona, scenario and goal-oriented techniques. This paper discusses the model and procedure of PSG methodology, and demonstrates its effectiveness by applying the methodology to reengineering a Web application system.',9,'problems',0,'proposals, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7080,58,13,-1,'','',7,'notDone',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7081,127,13,NULL,'Paper not found','Requirements engineering (RE) is concerned with the elicitation of the objectives to be achieved by the system envisioned, the operationalization of such objectives into specifications of services and constraints, the assignment of responsibilities for the resulting requirements to agents such as humans, devices and software, and the evolution of such requirements over time and across system families. Getting high-quality requirements is difficult and critical. Recent surveys have confirmed the growing recognition of RE as an area of primary concern in software engineering research and practice. The paper reviews the important limitations of OO modeling and formal specification technology when applied to this early phase of the software lifecycle. It argues that goals are an essential abstraction for eliciting, elaborating, modeling, specifying, analyzing, verifying, negotiating and documenting robust and conflict-free requirements. A safety injection system for a nuclear power plant is used as a running example to illustrate the key role of goals while engineering requirements for high assurance systems.',15,'problems',0,'metaStudy',0),(7082,NULL,13,NULL,'This is a tutorial paper and it is just 2 pages.','',1,'notDone',0,'',1),(7083,44,13,NULL,'','',7,'done',0,'',1),(7084,19,12,3,'','',16,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7085,25,12,3,'Tong:\r\nPaper type\r\nwhy not \"transformation-mapping\"? ok\r\nTopics:\r\nWhy not \"agent\": ok\r\nWhy \"aspect\": ok\r\nWhy \"pattern\": ok','Some quality attributes are known to have an impact on the overall architecture of a system, so that they are required to be properly handled from the early beginning of the software development. For example, adaptability is a key concern for autonomic and adaptive systems, which brings to them the capability to alter their behavior in response to changes on their surrounding environments. In this paper, we propose a Strategy for Transition between Requirements and Architectural Models for Adaptive sys- tems (STREAM-A). In particular, we use goal models based on the i* (i-Star) framework to support the design and evolution of systems that require adaptability. To obtain software architectures for such systems, the STREAM-A approach uses model transformations from i* models to architectural models expressed in Acme. Both the requirements and the architectural model are refined to accomplish the adaptability requirement.',23,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, extensions',0),(7086,24,12,3,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations',0),(7087,18,12,NULL,'','Self-adaptive systems aim at autonomously achieving their objectives in a dynamic environment, adapting their behavior to different circumstances. We claim that appropriate software engineering methodologies are needed to define and to model the information necessary for a system to perform autonomous diagnosis and decision making at runtime.In this short paper we focus on conceptual modeling for the design of self-adaptive software. Our design framework adopts a goal-oriented approach to specify variability in system requirements, coping with some limits of current goal modeling approaches.',2,'done',0,'',1),(7088,NULL,12,NULL,'Paper not found','',10,'notDone',0,'',1),(7089,26,12,6,'Tong\r\nWhy \"Scalability\"\r\n','',18,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7090,17,11,7,'','',12,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalBenchmark, evalScalability',0),(7091,20,11,3,'why scalability','',42,'problems',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7092,28,11,9,'','',9,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7093,20,11,NULL,'extends iStar','A collaborative system is software which allows several users to work together and carry out collaboration, communication and coordination tasks. To perform these tasks, the users have to be aware of other user’s actions, usually by means of a set of awareness techniques. In previous works, we found by means of empirical studies that the most suitable Requirements Engineering approach to specify the requirements of this kind of systems is the Goal-Oriented one, and more precisely i* approach. In this paper, CSRML (Collaborative Systems Requirements Modelling Language) is presented, an extension of i* to deal with the specification of the requirements of these systems in which the collaboration and the awareness of other users presence / actions are crucial. In order to validate this proposal, a case study has been carried out by modelling a jigsaw activity: a cooperative-learning technique in which students individually do some research in a proposed problem and then they teach each other what they have learned by sharing each individual view of the problem.',13,'done',0,'proposals, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7094,20,11,-1,'','Requirements engineering for complex systems often requires inter-disciplinary collaboration between domain experts who might not have software or systems engineering background. Existing requirements modeling languages unfortunately do not support this scenario well. First, the visual notation of languages like UML or SysML does not follow scientific heuristics and therefore does not provide a homogeneous and more important interdisciplinary comprehensible visualization. Second they provide isolated solutions for specific aspects like feature modeling or hazard modeling and therefore do not provide integrated and interdisciplinary traceability. We propose the Unified Requirements Modeling Language (URML) to overcome these two issues. URML integrates aspects like goal modeling, feature modeling and hazard analysis into one model and aims at a homogeneous and comprehensible visualization. In this paper we propose the meta-model for URML, describe the development of the corresponding visualization as well as initial tool support.',4,'notDone',0,'proposals, implementations',1),(7095,NULL,11,NULL,'','',NULL,'done',0,'',1),(7096,37,11,12,'','',12,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions',0),(7097,19,11,8,'','The intention of this paper is to introduce a risk analysis methodology called Astrolabe. Astrolabe is based on causal analysis of systems risks. It allows the analysts to both align the current standpoint of the system with its intentions and identify any vulnerabilities or hazards that threaten the systems stability. Astrolabe adopts concepts from organizational theory and software requirement engineering. The aim of Astrolabe is to guide risk analysis through its phases so that a near complete investigation of system risks is performed. The concepts and methods driving the Astrolabe methodology have been clearly explained in this paper.',19,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7098,16,11,-1,'','',27,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7099,50,11,NULL,'','Goal oriented modeling methods are one of the promising approaches to elicit requirements. However, the difficulties in goal decomposition during requirements elicitation processes and a lack of the technique to utilize domain knowledge are obstacles to make them widely used in industry community. This paper proposes a method call GOORE where a domain ontology is utilized to support goal decomposition as domain knowledge to support goal decomposition. Although the experimental case study of feed readers suggested some points necessary to be improved, our approach can make goal oriented approach more powerful and more widely used.',10,'problems',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions, interpretations, evalCE, evalSurvey, evalCaseStudy',0),(7100,NULL,11,NULL,'not our goal models','',10,'notDone',0,'',1),(7101,NULL,11,NULL,'','',9,'done',0,'',1),(7102,30,10,NULL,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, evalScalability',0),(7103,14,10,4,'','The need to consider security from the early stages of the development process of information systems has been argued by academics and industrialists alike, and security risk management has been recognised as one of the most prominent techniques for eliciting security requirements. However, although existing security modelling languages provide some means to model security aspects, they do not contain concrete constructs to address vulnerable system assets, their risks, and risk treatments. Furthermore, security languages do not provide a crosscutting viewpoint relating all three – assets, risks and risk treatments – together. This is problematic since, for a security analyst, it is difficult to detect what the potential security flaws could be, and how they need to be fixed. In this paper, we extend the Secure Tropos language, an agent- and goal-oriented security modelling language to support modelling of security risks. Based on previous work, where we had observed some inadequacies of this language to model security risks, this paper suggests improvements of Secure Tropos semantics and syntax. On the syntax level we extend the concrete and abstract syntax of the language, so that it covers the security risk management domain. On the semantic level, we illustrate how language constructs need to be improved to address the three different levels of security risk management. The suggested improvements are illustrated with the aid of a running example, called eSAP, from the healthcare domain.',28,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions',0),(7104,47,10,NULL,'','We motivate the need for a new requirements engineering\r\nmethodology for systematically helping businesses and users to\r\nadopt cloud services and for mitigating risks in such transition.\r\nThe methodology is grounded in goal oriented approaches for\r\nrequirements engineering. We argue that Goal Oriented\r\nRequirements Engineering (GORE) is a promising paradigm to\r\nadopt for goals that are generic and flexible statements of users’\r\nrequirements, which could be refined, elaborated, negotiated,\r\nmitigated for risks and analysed for economics considerations. We\r\ndescribe the steps of the proposed process and exemplify the use\r\nof the methodology through an example. The methodology can be\r\nused by small to large scale organisations to inform crucial\r\ndecisions related to cloud adoption.',7,'notDone',0,'',1),(7105,14,10,NULL,'','Understanding and analyzing the needs of an enterprise in the early stages of a project requires knowledge about stakeholders, their goals, interactions, and alternative actions. Agent-goal models offer a way to systematically and graphically capture this information, even as it evolves through continued elicitation. However, the complexity of resulting models makes it difficult to evaluate the achievement of key stakeholder goals within a model without applying systematic analysis procedures. Existing approaches to agent-goal model evaluation focus on automated procedures, without explicitly promoting model iteration and domain elicitation. In this paper, the authors argue that “Earlyâ€ Enterprise modeling requires analysis procedures that account for the incompleteness and informality of early agent-goal models, facilitating iteration, elicitation, and user participation. A qualitative, interactive evaluation procedure for agent-goal models is introduced, using the i* Framework illustrated. Case study experience and results of an exploratory experiment show the applicability of the procedure to early enterprise analysis.',23,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCE, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7106,36,10,7,'','',14,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7107,34,10,2,'','',5,'done',0,'',1),(7108,12,10,NULL,'','',25,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions, evalCE',0),(7109,19,10,-1,'','',7,'done',0,'metaStudy',1),(7110,27,10,10,'why agents, integration? \r\nagent because of actors, used a lot.  They do some transformation and mapping, but I guess the work is more of an extension, so OK.  ','',11,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions',0),(7111,19,10,8,'Paper not found','Knowledge economy requires data mining be more goal-oriented so that more tangible results can be produced. This requirement implies that the semantics of the data should be incorporated into the mining process. Data mining is ready to deal with this challenge because recent developments in data mining have shown an increasing interest on mining of complex data (as exemplified by graph mining, text mining, etc.). By incorporating the relationships of the data along with the data itself (rather than focusing on the data alone), complex data injects semantics into the mining process, thus enhancing the potential of making better contribution to knowledge economy. Since the relationships between the data reveal certain behavioral aspects underlying the plain data, this shift of mining from simple data to complex data signals a fundamental change to a new stage in the research and practice of knowledge discovery, which can be termed as behavior mining. Behavior mining also has the potential of unifying some other recent activities in data mining. We discuss important aspects on behavior mining, and discuss its implications for the future of data mining.',8,'problems',0,'',1),(7112,NULL,10,NULL,'not about goals, in the end they say it is incompatible with goal modeling','',18,'notDone',0,'',1),(7113,NULL,10,NULL,'It is not filled in the database. For me, it is out of scope','',17,'done',0,'',1),(7114,12,10,NULL,'','',28,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions',0),(7115,NULL,10,NULL,'','',10,'notDone',0,'',1),(7116,10,9,5,'Tong:\r\nType\r\nWhy \"Scalability\"?','',20,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7117,16,9,NULL,'Tong:\r\nTopic \"Pattern\"?','To deal with the increasing complexity and uncertainty\r\nof software systems, novel software engineering models\r\nand tools are required to make such systems self-adaptive.\r\nAs part of ongoing research, we investigate various models,\r\nschemes and mechanisms to model and engineer self-adaptation\r\nin complex software systems. To this end, we have defined\r\nSOTA (State of the Affairs) as a general goal-oriented modeling\r\nframework for the analysis and design of self-adaptive systems.\r\nIn this paper, by transforming the conceptual SOTA model into\r\nan operational one, we show how SOTA can be an effective\r\ntool to perform an early, goal-level, model checking analysis\r\nfor adaptive systems. This allows the developers of complex\r\nself-adaptive systems to validate the actual correctness of the\r\nself-adaptive requirements at an early stage in the software\r\nlife-cycle. The approach is explored and validated using a case\r\nstudy in the area of e-mobility.',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7118,22,9,2,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions',0),(7119,18,9,-1,'Tong\r\nType\r\nWhy \"Scalability\"\r\nTopic\r\nWhy \"Agents\"','',8,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7120,12,9,4,'This paper does not model nor analyze goals\r\n','',15,'done',0,'',1),(7121,19,9,5,'','In November 2008, the User Requirements Notation (URN) was approved as Recommendation Z.151 by the Standardization Sec- tor of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T). URN is the first and currently only standard that supports both goal-oriented and scenario-based modeling for requirements engineering activities. The Aspect-oriented URN (AoURN) is a recent extension of URN that com- bines goals, scenarios, and aspects in one framework. AoURN is a can- didate for future versions of the URN standard. We first summarize the basic concepts and notation of AoURN and then discuss advanced fea- tures of AoURN that are necessary for large-scale modeling. Based on our experience with AoURN modeling, we present a list of requirements including rationale for an aspect-oriented extension of Z.151 that suc- cinctly expresses the required features to evolve URN into a complete aspect-oriented modeling framework.',17,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions',0),(7122,NULL,9,NULL,'','',11,'done',0,'',1),(7123,12,9,7,'','Autonomic computing has become more prevalent in recent years for its vision of developing applications with self-adaptive and self-managing behavior. Due to the inherent complexity of such applications and the nature of the built-in closed-loop feedback control, maintainability issues of autonomic systems are emerging as significant concerns in autonomic system designs. This paper identifies and categorizes types of common forms of autonomic element patterns and reveals the inherent relationships among them as well as their particular maintainability concerns. The key to maintainability of self-managing systems is their embedded control loops. Good software engineering practice calls for making the control loops as independent as possible to achieve loose coupling and separate concerns. However, typical self managing systems solutions feature arrangements of interdependent, collaborative autonomic elements. This paper outlines selected autonomic element patterns derived from requirements goal models and attribute-based architectural styles for self-adaptive systems and then identifies their particular maintainability concerns based on the characteristics of the solutionpsilas control loops. Maintainability issues for the various autonomic element patterns are illustrated using a book store example.',10,'done',0,'proposals, extensions',0),(7124,NULL,9,NULL,' International Workshop, AOSE 2007, but then this is revised. what should it be?','',14,'done',0,'',1),(7125,20,9,3,'','',3,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions',0),(7126,49,9,16,'','',18,'done',0,'implementations',0),(7127,NULL,9,NULL,'','',11,'notDone',0,'',1),(7128,13,8,NULL,'','',9,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, interpretations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7129,2,8,2,'GORE-for-BP','Business processes are designed to execute strategies that aim at achieving organisational goals. During the last decade, several methods have been proposed that prescribe the use of goal-oriented requirements engineering techniques for supporting different business process management activities, in particular business process modelling. The integration of goal modelling and business process modelling aims at increasing the alignment between business strategies and the processes with their supporting IT systems. This new research area, which we call Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering for Business Processes (GORE-for-BP), is developing rapidly, but without a clear conceptualization of the focus and scope of the proposed GORE for-BP methods. Furthermore, an overview is lacking of which methods exist and what their level of maturity is. This paper therefore presents a research review of the GORE-for-BP area, with the aim of identifying relevant methods and assessing their focus, scope, and maturity. Our study used Systematic Literature Review and Method Meta-Modelling as research methods to identify and evaluate the state of the GORE-for BP research area and to propose a research agenda for directing future research in the area. Nineteen methods were identified, which is an indication of an active research area. Although some similarities were found with respect to how goal models are transformed into business process models (or vice-versa), there is also considerable divergence in modelling languages used and the extent of coverage of typical requirements engineering and business process management lifecycle phases. Furthermore, the exploitation of requirements engineering techniques in the full business process management lifecycle is currently under researched. Also, the maturity of the methods found in terms of the formalisation of the transformation activity, the elaboration of method guidelines, and the extent to which methods are validated, can be further improved.',36,'done',0,'proposals, metaStudy',0),(7130,19,8,-1,'they did experiments with people.i marked it as controlled experiments. ','',9,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCE, evalScalability, applications',0),(7131,NULL,8,NULL,'','',9,'done',0,'',1),(7132,18,8,1,'','',6,'done',0,'proposals, extensions',0),(7133,41,8,4,'','The i* framework is a popular conceptual modeling language for capturing the social characteristics of complex systems in terms of actors, their intentions, and their relationships. In November 2008, the International Tele- communications Union standardized the Goal-oriented Requirement Language (GRL) as part of the User Requirements Notation (URN). GRL is based on an extended subset of i*, and both share many concepts. However, GRL is rather permissive and can be used in ways that deviate from conventional i* modeling guidelines. In addition, some i* concepts do not have equivalent first-class con- cepts in GRL. In this paper, we present a lightweight GRL profile for i* that takes advantage of GRL’s extensibility features to capture missing i* concepts. We also present formal constraints on the use of GRL and its extensions to re- strict it to an i* style. This profile enables GRL modeling and analysis tools to be used for i* models, resulting in i* models that conform to an international standard and that can be integrated with URN’s scenario notation, namely Use Case Maps. This profile is implemented in the jUCMNav modeling tool.',10,'done',0,'',1),(7134,8,8,3,'','This paper proposes and illustrates an\r\napproach to identify and specify requirements on\r\ninformation-based business services and their associated\r\nderived software services. The approach proposes first\r\nto identify business services by modeling business\r\nrequirements using the goal oriented modeling notation\r\ni*. Then, in a second phase, the identified services are\r\nrefined according to these requirements using UML\r\nactivity and class diagrams. This specification is based\r\non a method and a supporting toolset, called \"Efficient\".\r\nThe approach is illustrated through the handling of a\r\ncase study in the tourism sector.',6,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7135,15,7,3,'','Requirements completeness is among the most critical and difficult software engineering challenges. Missing requirements often result from poor risk analysis at requirements engineering time. Obstacle analysis is a goal-oriented form of risk analysis aimed at anticipating exceptional conditions in which the software should behave adequately. In the identify-assess-control cycles of such analysis, the assessment step is not well supported by existing techniques. This step is concerned with evaluating how likely the obstacles to goals are and how likely and severe their consequences are. Those key factors drive the selection of most appropriate countermeasures to be integrated in the system goal model for increased completeness. Moreover, obstacles to probabilistic goals are currently not supported; such goals prescribe that some corresponding target property should be satisfied in at least X % of the cases. The paper presents a probabilistic framework for goal specification and obstacle assessment. The specification language for goals and obstacles is extended with a probabilistic layer where probabilities have a precise semantics grounded on system-specific\r\nphenomena. The probability of a root obstacle to a goal is thereby computed by up-propagation of probabilities of finer-grained obstacles through the obstacle refinement tree. The probability and severity of obstacle consequences is in turn computed by up-propagation from the obstructed leaf goals through the goal refinement graph. The paper shows how the computed information can be used to prioritize obstacles for countermeasure selection toward a more complete and robust goal model. A detailed evaluation of our framework on a non-trivial carpooling support system is also reported.',17,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7136,NULL,7,NULL,'','',9,'notDone',0,'',1),(7137,17,7,-1,'','',5,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7138,15,7,5,'','',10,'problems',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCE',0),(7139,19,7,-1,'','A dynamically adaptive system (DAS) monitors itself and its execution environment to evaluate requirements satisfaction at run time. Unanticipated environmental conditions may produce sensory inputs that alter the self-assessment capabilities of a DAS in unpredictable and undesirable ways. Moreover, it is impossible for a human to know or enumerate all possible combinations of system and environmental conditions that a DAS may encounter throughout its lifetime. This paper introduces Loki, an approach for automatically discovering combinations of environmental conditions that produce requirements violations and latent behaviors in a DAS. By anticipating adverse environmental conditions that might arise at run time, Loki facilitates the identification of goals with inadequate obstacle mitigations or insufficient constraints to prevent such unwanted behaviors. We apply Loki to an autonomous vehicle system and describe several undesirable behaviors discovered.',3,'problems',0,'proposals, implementations, evalCE, evalCaseStudy',0),(7140,11,7,-1,'','',11,'done',0,'metaStudy, evalCaseStudy',0),(7141,13,7,3,'why integration?','Context: During development managers, analysts and designers often need to know whether enough requirements analysis work has been done and whether or not it is safe to proceed to the design stage.\r\nObjective: This paper describes a new, simple and practical method for assessing our confidence in a set of requirements.\r\nMethod: We identified four confidence factors and used a goal oriented framework with a simple ordinal scale to develop a method for assessing confidence. We illustrate the method and show how it has been applied to a real systems development project.\r\nResults: We show how assessing confidence in the requirements could have revealed problems in this project earlier and so saved both time and money.\r\nConclusion: Our meta-level assessment of requirements provides a practical and pragmatic method that can prove useful to managers, analysts and designers who need to know when sufficient requirements\r\nanalysis has been performed.',13,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, extensions, evalSurvey, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7142,NULL,7,NULL,'','',9,'notDone',0,'',1),(7143,9,7,5,'why not scenarios?','',24,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7144,12,7,NULL,'','',6,'done',0,'proposals, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7145,15,7,4,'Tong:\r\nPaper type:\r\nWhy \"Formalization\": ok\r\nWhy \"Implementation\": ok\r\nTopics:\r\nWhy not \"Agent\": ok','Requirements engineering and architectural design are key activities for successful development of software systems. Both activities are strongly intertwined and interrelated, but many steps toward generating architecture models from requirements models are driven by intuition and architectural knowledge. Thus, systematic approaches that integrate requirements engineering and architectural design activities are needed. This paper presents an approach based on model transformations to generate architectural models from requirements models. The source and target languages are respectively the i* modeling language and Acme architectural description language (ADL). A real web-based recommendation system is used as case study to illustrate our approach.',10,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7146,22,7,4,'This is a workshop paper in RIGIM, hard to tell','',9,'done',0,'',1),(7147,NULL,7,NULL,'Paper not found\r\n\r\nTong\r\nPaper found, and complete the first round analysis','',6,'problems',0,'proposals, integrations',0),(7148,NULL,7,NULL,'QoP: quality of protection workshop','',4,'notDone',0,'',1),(7149,22,7,4,'','',14,'done',0,'',1),(7150,24,7,5,'','',16,'done',0,'proposals, evalCaseStudy, applications',0),(7151,27,7,-1,'why scalability?','As an attempt to answer the need for methods and tools in requirements engineering (RE) which are domain specific and can address the main RE objectives (REOs), and the growing interest in the goal oriented requirements engineering (GORE) approach that overcomes the inadequacy of the traditional systems analysis approaches, we systematically evaluate the KAOS method, and the Objectiver tool, using the major REOs widely accepted as being important attributes of requirements specifications. In addition, we examine whether KAOS and Objectiver meet their own self- defined objectives. We use two target problems as a basis for the evaluation. The result of the target problems is raw data consisting of error reports and observations that support the evaluator’s judgment. The evaluation itself is qualitative, not a statistical experimental evaluation. Its result will help to answer the research questions: (i) How well do KAOS and Objectiver meet the criteria established in the discipline of RE; and (ii) How well do KAOS and Objectiver achieve their own self-defined objectives.',11,'problems',0,'evalCaseStudy',0),(7152,8,7,-1,'i would add \r\nIntegration - Transformation - Mapping\r\nproposal \r\n','',3,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCE',0),(7153,22,7,NULL,'why not NFR, or multiple?','Pattern-based approach has proven to be an effective means for capturing and reusing past experience and best practices to facilitate communication and shorten the time required for software modeling. However, current knowledge capture is limited to mostly functional knowledge. Knowledge reuse is also often manual and limited to low scale small model fragments. This paper presents a goal-object pattern framework that captures both functional and non-functional requirements knowledge that is modeled using UML and a goal-oriented method. Patterns in this framework are a collection of model refinement methods, each defining a single model element generation step in the target model. The patterns are model-driven in that they are defined using a UML metamodel and then used as such. The framework also  supports incremental knowledge capture in that large-grain patterns can be composed from fine-grain ones, and also application-independent patterns can be specialized into application-specific ones. The framework is illustrated using a simplified on-line book-store application to demonstrate how large-scale reuse may be possible.',5,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, extensions',0),(7154,35,7,3,'MADE is the thing they develop, they do not use a particular goal modeling framework. so i put general.','',7,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7155,17,7,4,'','',11,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7156,51,7,5,'','',15,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7157,59,7,NULL,'','',1,'notDone',0,'',1),(7158,14,6,3,'','',16,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, extensions, evalSurvey, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7159,26,6,NULL,'DDNs','[Context/Motivation] Different modeling techniques have been used to model requirements and decision-making of self-adaptive systems (SASs). Specifically, goal models have been prolific in supporting decision-making depending on partial and total fulfilment of functional\r\n(goals) and non-functional requirements (softgoals). Different goal-realization strategies can have different effects on softgoals which are\r\nspecified with weighted contribution-links. The final decision about what strategy to use is based, among other reasons, on a utility function that takes into account the weighted sum of the different effects on softgoals.\r\n[Questions/Problems] One of the main challenges about decision-making in self-adaptive systems is to deal with uncertainty during runtime. New techniques are needed to systematically revise the current model when empirical evidence becomes available from the deployment.\r\n[Principal ideas/results] In this paper we enrich the decision-making\r\nsupported by goal models by using Dynamic Decision Networks (DDNs).\r\nGoal realization strategies and their impact on softgoals have a correspondence with decision alternatives and conditional probabilities and expected utilities in the DDNs respectively. Our novel approach allows the specification of preferences over the softgoals and supports reasoning about partial satisfaction of softgoals using probabilities. We report results of the application of the approach on two different cases. Our early results suggest the decision-making process of SASs can be improved by using DDNs.',16,'problems',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7160,18,6,2,'','',21,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7161,13,6,-1,'','',1,'done',0,'',1),(7162,13,6,NULL,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalScalability',0),(7163,14,6,-1,'','Goal modeling is an important part of various types of activities such as requirements engineering, business management, and compliance assessment. The Goal-oriented Requirement Language is a standard and mature goal modeling language supported by the jUCMNav tool. However, recent applications of GRL to a regulatory context highlighted several analysis issues and limitations whose resolutions are urgent, and also likely applicable to other languages and tools. This paper investigates issues related to the computation of strategy and model differences, the management of complexity and uncertainty, sensitivity analysis, and various domain-specific considerations. For each, a solution is proposed, implemented in jUCMNav, and illustrated through simple examples. These solutions greatly increase the analysis capabilities of GRL and jUCMNav in order to handle real problems.',9,'done',0,'',1),(7164,31,6,-1,'','',14,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7165,12,6,NULL,'','Simultaneously satisfying multiple interacting and possibly\r\nconflicting software requirements is challenging. Quantitative cost-benet analysis of alternative solutions is often hard or biased, and early decisions based on numerical estimates of requirements satisfaction are thus unreliable. We propose a trade-o analysis method that assists decision making in the absence of numerical data. We structure\r\nthe requirements trade-o problem in terms of a goal model containing alternative design solutions and decision criteria. We propose a trade-o analysis algorithm that takes pair-wise comparisons of alternatives and determines the best solution among alternatives. The optimum alternative is decided by using a heuristic method, which may need to consult with domain experts. We take advantage of the Even Swaps method to incorporate stakeholders preferences into the decision analysis. The algorithm is implemented in a prototype tool and evaluated in an industrial case study.',7,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability, applications',0),(7166,9,6,-1,'nfr, tropos','',17,'problems',0,'proposals, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7167,9,6,-1,'','',22,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7168,12,6,NULL,'','',20,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, extensions',0),(7169,10,6,-1,'','In organizations, a gap commonly exists between busi- Modeling can help formalize and document such artifacts. ness goals and business processes. While several approaches provide For example, just to name a few possibilities:\r\nvide modeling solutions in each of these two areas, their relationships are often not defined well enough to be used in the software development process. This paper aims to better fill this gap through the introduction of a pattern-based framework that helps construct business processes from organization goals while maintaining traceability relationships between the two. How to extract patterns, which are composed of goal templates, process templates, and their relationships, is briefly presented. The framework, which includes a collection of patterns for a particu- lar domain, is formalized as a profile of the User Requirements Notation, a standard modeling language that supports goals, scenarios, and links between them. A method for the use of such framework is defined and then illustrated through a case study involving an adverse event management system that targets the improvement of patient safety in healthcare organizations.',8,'problems',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7170,20,6,4,'why agents?\r\nagents = actors and they use actors a lot','The field of requirements engineering for business processes has grown during the last several years. As business processes are assumed to fulfil organizational goals, goal models could be transformed into business process models that specify how business processes fulfil the organizational goals. Although both the fields of Goal-Oriented RE (GORE) and Business Process Management (BPM) received a lot of attention from researchers, the methods to transform goal models into business process models still need further research. This scientific evaluation paper analyses current methods to identify the practical challenges that need to be addressed for an effective transformation of goal models into business process models. We illustrate the dis- covered challenges using the case study of Seven-Eleven Japan. The main challenges that were discovered are a lack of responsible role, insufficient concept mappings, informality of the transformation algorithm, no full support for organisational structure and a lack of inter-model consistency checks. Our expected contribution of discovering these challenges is to lower the barriers of transferring new goal-to-process methods to industry. As we consider i* constructs the most adequate in GORE for our purposes, we limit our study to transformations that start from i* goal models.',8,'done',0,'metaStudy, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7171,12,6,4,'In my opinion is out of scope.','The widespread usage of technology for service provision to customers has created a new and challenging environment for the design of interactive systems, with the emergence of technology enabled multi-channel services. Requirements engineers involved in the design of such service systems must actively work together with interaction designers and service managers to better integrate customer service experience and technology components, requiring unifying methods and tools within the emerging field of service science management and engineering. This paper proposes the service experience blueprint (SEB), a multidisciplinary method for the design of technology enabled multi-channel service systems and illustrates its application in two examples of redesign of banking services that involved an extensive study with more than 4,000 bank customers. The SEB method is based on concepts and tools from RE and interaction design, such as goal-oriented analysis and conceptual modeling, but also uses methods developed in the service and marketing fields, such as service blueprinting. SEB brings marketing research methods to the requirements process, as they can provide a useful contribution for the elicitation of customer experience requirements in service environments. By bringing together goal-oriented modeling and use case modeling from requirements engineering, with service blueprinting from service design, the SEB method contributes to creating a shared understanding and a unifying language to better support the design of new technology enabled multi-channel service systems, where technology and service issues are deeply intertwined. ',19,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, extensions, evalSurvey, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7172,18,6,-1,'NFR, tropos,','',12,'done',0,'proposals, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7173,20,6,6,'why not scenario?','',14,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions',0),(7174,14,6,5,'','',11,'done',0,'proposals, extensions',0),(7175,14,6,4,'Tong:\r\nPaper type\r\nWhy \"Scalability\"\r\nTopic\r\nWhy not \"Agent\"\r\n\r\nOh, this paper is a local conference paper \"First European Conference, ECSA 2007 \"!','There is a recognized gap between requirements and architectures. There is also evidence that architecture evaluation, when done at the early phases of the development lifecycle, is an effective way to ensure the quality attributes of the final system. As quality attributes may be satisfied at a different extent by different alternative architectural solutions, an exploration and evaluation of alternatives is often needed. In order to address this issue at the requirements level, we propose to model architectures using the i* framework, a goal-oriented modelling language that allows to represent the functional and non-functional requirements of an architecture using actors and dependencies instead of components and connectors. Once the architectures are modelled, we propose guidelines for the generation of alternative architectures based upon existing architectural patterns, and for the definition of structural metrics for the evaluation of the resulting alternative models. The applicability of the approach is shown with the Home Service Robot case study.',17,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',1),(7176,17,6,3,'','',33,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations',0),(7177,NULL,6,NULL,'Paper not found\r\n\r\nTong\r\nThis is a workshop paper and should be out','',18,'problems',0,'',1),(7178,NULL,6,NULL,'workshop','',9,'notDone',0,'',1),(7179,18,6,8,'Tong \r\nType\r\nWhy \"Scalability\"\r\nTopic\r\nWhy not \"Early requirements engineering\"','',33,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7180,79,6,15,'','',12,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, evalBenchmark, evalScalability',0),(7181,25,6,5,'','Software package selection can be seen as a process of matching the products available in the marketplace with the requirements stated by an organization. This process may involve hundreds of requirements and products and therefore we need a framework abstract enough to focus on the most important factors that influence the selection. Due to their strategic nature, goal-oriented models are good candidates to be used as a basis of such a framework. They have demonstrated their usefulness in contexts like early requirements engineering, organizational analysis and business process reengineering. In this paper, we identify three different types of goal-oriented models useful in the context of package selection when some assumptions hold. Market segment models provide a shared view to all the packages of the segment; software package models are derived from them. The selection can be seen as a process of matching among the organizational model and the other models; in our proposal this matching is lightweight, since no model checking is performed. We define our approach rigorously by means of a UML conceptual data model.',15,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions',0),(7182,NULL,6,NULL,'','',1,'done',0,'',1),(7183,23,6,-1,'Why integration-transf-mapping?','An important issue in getting the agent technology into mainstream software development is the development of appropriate methodologies for developing agent-oriented systems. This paper presents an approach to model distributed systems based on a goal-oriented requirements acquisition. These models are acquired as instances of a conceptual meta-model. The latter can be represented as a graph where each node captures a concept such as, e.g., goal, action, agent, or scenario, and where the edges capture semantic links between such abstractions. This approach is supported by a modeling language, the ANote, which presents views that capture the most important modeling aspects according to the concept currently under consideration.',9,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, interpretations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7184,NULL,6,NULL,'not our goals!','',17,'done',0,'',1),(7185,5,5,-1,'','',24,'done',0,'proposals, evalCaseStudy',0),(7186,25,5,6,'','',17,'done',0,'proposals, integrations',0),(7187,2,5,-1,'The paper is written in Chinese (only the title and abstract is in English)','',10,'notDone',0,'',1),(7188,NULL,5,NULL,'','',9,'notDone',0,'',1),(7189,14,5,NULL,'General, or NFR or Gore as they refer to it?\r\nPrev: multiple ','To provide an effective service-oriented solution for a business problem by composing existing services, it is necessary to explore all available options for providing the required functionality while considering both the users’ preferences between various non-functional properties (NFPs) and any low-level constraints. Existing service composition frameworks often fall short of this ideal, as functional requirements, low-level behavioral constraints, and preferences between non functional properties are often not considered in one unified framework. We propose a new service composition framework that addresses all three of these aspects by integrating existing techniques in requirements engineering, preference reasoning, and model checking. We prove that any composition produced by our framework provides the required high-level functionality, satisfies all low-level constraints, and is at least as preferred (w.r.t. NFPs) as any other possible composition that fulfills the same requirements. We also apply our framework to examples adapted from the existing service composition literature.',15,'problems',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7190,8,5,3,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7191,NULL,5,NULL,'','',5,'done',0,'',1),(7192,7,5,2,'Cannot download the paper','',20,'done',0,'proposals',1),(7193,12,5,-1,'','Self-adaptive systems have recently attracted attention because of their ability to cope with changing environments, including sys- tem intrusions or faults. Such software must modify itself to bet- ter fit its environment, and one of the approaches by which we expect this capability to be achieved is the introduction of multi- ple control loops to assess the situation and to determine whether a change in behaviors or configurations is necessary and how to implement the change. Development of such systems with multi- ple control loops complicates the task of identifying components, and could be greatly aided by appropriate tool support. In this pa- per, we propose an architectural compiler for self-adaptive systems, which generates architectural configurations from the goal-oriented requirements descriptions. We also present a framework for gener- ating such configurations with this compiler and a pattern in the requirements description. We evaluate the framework experimen- tally and show that it helps to generate suitable configurations that have high performance, and that the compiler scales well to large input models.',9,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalScalability',0),(7194,NULL,5,NULL,'Close, but no goal models, no RE','',16,'notDone',0,'',1),(7195,18,5,NULL,'','Compliance of business processes with authoritative rules is significantly important to avoid financial penalties, efficiency problems, and reputation damages. However, finding the right measures to evaluate and track compliance is very challenging. We propose a novel method to model the context and measure compliance using the User Requirements Notation (URN). We mainly use Key Performance Indicator (KPI) extensions of URN to measure the level of compliance to rules. Such KPIs have been used in the past to measure the satisfaction level of goals and the performance of business processes. Yet, they have never been used for measuring compliance. Our method highlights the non-compliant policies and rules on a quadrant map based on their importance and compliance levels. Furthermore, we suggest a new method for importance calculation in this context. We use a human resource policy example to illustrate our method.',11,'notDone',0,'',1),(7196,16,5,3,'','',13,'problems',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7197,9,5,-1,'','',15,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions, interpretations',0),(7198,28,5,4,'I cannot change the \"country\" field!','',15,'problems',0,'proposals, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7199,9,5,-1,'','This paper describes a multiple perspectives goal-oriented requirements elicitation framework aimed at identifying IT service requirements for service sourcing in a service-oriented software marketplace (E-services marketplace). The framework is based on decomposing strategic goals into tactical and operational IT goals adopting a multiple perspectives elicitation approach that facilitates business-IT alignment in the elicitation/mapping of the service requirements and in the choice of the target service offerings. The framework is applicable in a scenario where there is a marketplace of software service providers (e.g. ASP’s or web service yellow pages) and the sourcing organization is interested in developing service requirements and searching for services available in the marketplace that are aligned with the organizational goals. The framework is supported by a tool that helps the requirements analyst in the process of developing multiple perspectives service goal trees and also in the process of matching service goals to keywords describing service offerings available in the e-Service marketplace.',6,'problems',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7200,7,5,2,'','',17,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCE, evalCaseStudy',0),(7201,14,5,NULL,'','Offshore-outsourced software development is gaining popularity because companies are continuously forced to reduce production costs while keeping sustainable competitive strength. However, this trend of software development increases projects’ complexity and brings up risks to the overall project environment. Therefore, risks of offshore software development require to be managed as early as possible for a successful project. This paper considers a risk management model from a holistic perspective to manage offshore software development risk, integrated into early stages of development. The approach effectively identifies and specifies the goals of a project and the related risk factors. This is done at the basis of selected software development components within the running project. We show how to trace and control these risks already during early requirements engineering\r\nactivities. The model at hand is implemented into an ongoing offshore software development project to (1) identify goals and risk factors from the local context and finally (2) to determine its applicability of the approach in offshore software development projects from a vendors\r\nperspective. ',5,'done',0,'evalSurvey, evalCaseStudy',0),(7202,9,5,1,'why not preferences, variability?\r\nwhy scalability?','',4,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions',0),(7203,20,5,-1,'','',18,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations',0),(7204,19,5,5,'','',29,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, metaStudy, evalCE, evalScalability',0),(7205,8,5,3,'Tong:\r\nWhy \"Scalability\"\r\n\r\nThis is a local conference','Model checking is a powerful technique for verifying the correctness of a system’s specification. But even when the specification has been verified to be correct, there is still the question of whether the specification covers all the expected behaviors. One of the most important issues for verification is the sufficiency of verification items. In model checking, specification- level properties such as reachability are well-studied, but the sufficiency of a specification against the preceding requirements still remains a challenge.\r\nIn this paper, we propose a model-checking process with goal oriented requirements analysis, in which goal descriptions in a natural language are systematically refined into linear temporal logic formulae. Furthermore, the coverage of the verification result can be evaluated against the goal model. We developed a tool that supports the process, and applied it to an example. This process lowers the technical barriers to model checking and improves the sufficiency of system verification.',8,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',1),(7206,19,5,1,'Tong:\r\nWhy \"Business Modeling\"?\r\nWhy not \"Variability\"?','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7207,10,5,NULL,'Tong:\r\nWhy \"Case study\"?','Aspects promote a clear separation of concerns so that tangled and scattered concerns are modularized throughout software development. We propose a framework to trace aspects identified during goal-oriented requirements analysis to code and testing. Two types of checks are performed to validate the resulting system in light of stakeholders’ crosscutting concerns. One ensures that systems with and without aspects have the same functionality defined by the hard\r\ngoals. The other checks whether the weaved system with aspects indeed improves system qualities in terms of the degree of softgoal satisfaction. We demonstrate the approach using an open-source e-commerce platform.',4,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, integrations, evalScalability',0),(7208,NULL,5,NULL,'workshop','',NULL,'notDone',0,'',1),(7209,7,5,4,'','',13,'done',0,'',1),(7210,27,5,NULL,'','isn t it out? it is a workshop',7,'done',0,'proposals',1),(7211,47,5,-1,'','This paper explains how goal-oriented requirements engineering can be transposed into regulation modelling. It motivates also why this way of modelling regulations is worthwhile for people responsible for preparing regulations. In addition, the paper recounts how the approach has been applied to model ICAO Security Regulation for Civil Aviation in the context of the SAFEE project.',6,'done',0,'proposals, evalCaseStudy',0),(7212,NULL,5,NULL,'','',7,'done',0,'',1),(7213,NULL,5,NULL,'','',16,'done',0,'',1),(7214,NULL,5,NULL,'The goal model they refer to is a list of goals.','',19,'done',0,'',1),(7215,43,5,NULL,'','',11,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations',0),(7216,3,4,2,'','',9,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, extensions, interpretations, evalCE, evalSurvey, evalScalability',0),(7217,6,4,-1,'','The derivation of statecharts from requirements has been addressed from many perspectives. All of them assume that the derivation process is a linear series of refinements resulting in a single statechart, thereby missing the opportunity to explore alternatives in the design space. We propose a multi-dimensional approach that exploits inherent variabil- ity of the design space, where alternative refinements are considered for the same intermediate problem, resulting in multiple solutions (statecharts) from a single initial problem (requirements). In order to accomplish this, we propose an extended form of goal model where architects can incrementally refine the original requirements by considering behavioral alternatives leading to design solutions. The proposed refinement process is illustrated through an example from the literature. Experimentation with randomly generated models suggests that the proposal is scalable.',5,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, evalBenchmark',0),(7218,19,4,-1,'','',19,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, interpretations, evalBenchmark, evalCE',0),(7219,5,4,1,'prev: multiple','Context: Over the years, several modeling languages for requirements have been proposed. These languages employ different conceptual approaches, including scenario-based and goal-oriented ones. Empirical studies providing evidence about requirements model comprehensibility are rare, especially when addressing languages that belong to different modeling approaches.\r\nObjective: This work aims to compare the comprehensibility of requirements models expressed in different but comparable modeling approaches from a requirements analysts’ perspective. In particular, in this paper we compare the comprehensibility of requirements models expressed in two visual modeling languages: Use Case, which is scenario-based, and Tropos, which exploits goal-oriented modeling. We further compare the effort required for comprehending the different models, and the derived productivity in each case.\r\nMethod: Requirements model comprehensibility is measured here in the context of three types of tasks that analysts usually perform, namely mapping between textual description and the model elements, reading and understanding the model irrespectively of the original textual description, and modifying the model. This experimental evaluation has been conducted within a family of controlled experiments aiming at comparing the comprehensibility of Use Case and Tropos requirements models. Three runs of the experiment were performed, including a first experiment and two replications, involving 79 subjects overall (all of which were information systems students). The data for each experiment was separately analyzed, followed by a meta-analysis of the three experiments.\r\nResults: The experimental results show that Tropos models seem to be more comprehensible with respect to the three types of requirements analysis tasks, although more time consuming than Use Case models.\r\nConclusions: Measuring model comprehensibility by means of controlled experiments is feasible and provides a basis for comparing Tropos and Use Case models, although these languages belong to different modeling approaches. Specifically, Tropos outperformed Use Case in terms of comprehensibility, but required more effort leading to a similar productivity of the two languages.',21,'problems',0,'metaStudy, evalCE, evalSurvey',0),(7220,1,4,1,'','',20,'notDone',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7221,NULL,4,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7222,12,4,3,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCE, evalSurvey, evalCaseStudy',0),(7223,6,4,-1,'','Security Requirements Engineering (SRE) deals with the specification of security requirements for the system-to-be starting with the analysis of security issues as soon as in the early requirements phase. STS-ml is an actor- and goal- oriented requirements modelling language for Socio-Technical Systems (STSs), which represents the security needs the stakeholders express as constraints over the interactions between actors. In this paper, we present STS-Tool, the secu- rity requirements engineering tool that supports STS-ml. STS-Tool allows for modelling a socio-technical system at a high level of abstraction, expressing con- straints (security needs) over the interactions between the actors in the STS, and deriving security requirements in terms of social commitments (promises with contractual validity). It offers multi-view modelling, allowing designers to focus on a different perspective at a time, while promoting modularity.',7,'done',0,'implementations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7224,NULL,4,NULL,'','',15,'notDone',0,'',1),(7225,NULL,4,NULL,'','',1,'notDone',0,'',1),(7226,2,4,-1,'This paper suggests using goal models to decompose services. in my opinion none of our topics fit. ','',11,'problems',0,'proposals, applications',0),(7227,9,4,-1,'','',9,'problems',0,'proposals, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7228,10,4,NULL,'','',4,'problems',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations',0),(7229,NULL,4,NULL,'The name is i; rather than i*','',5,'problems',0,'',1),(7230,NULL,4,NULL,'','',9,'notDone',0,'',1),(7231,6,4,NULL,'why integration, implementation?','Software requirements, especially non-functional requirements, are considered as vital prerequisites for producing software of high quality. As widely accepted, non-functional goal modeling like the NFR Framework usually employs tree modeling style, and presents an interactive process for the analysis of nonfunctional requirements. However, there still exist some problems during the identification of satisficing status. This paper based on the popular NFR goal model reasoning manners, clearly distinguishes the closed world assumption and the open world assumption, and proposes an automatic reasoning mechanism for NFR goal models in order to identify the satisficing statuses of the goal tree roots according to leaves’ contributions. Under a specific assumption, goals’ satisficing statuses will be transformed to affect satisficing statuses of their parents. Then parents satisficing statuses will be inferred according to the reasoning rules derived from different decomposition relationships. By alternately adopting these two steps, goal tree root’s satisficing status can be identified layer by layer. An illustrative example is used to show how our proposed formal approach works. ',7,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations',0),(7232,NULL,4,NULL,'workshop paper','',5,'notDone',0,'',1),(7233,5,4,-1,'There is an ontology and rules, but are they enough to consider formalization. obviously there is something formal behind this. \r\n\r\nwhy evaluation questionnaire?','',21,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, evalSurvey',0),(7234,NULL,4,NULL,'This is a workshop paper','',4,'done',0,'',1),(7235,16,4,-1,'Tong:\r\nWhy \"Scalability\"\r\nWhy not \"Mapping\"','Customizing software to perfectly fit individual needs is becoming increasingly important in information systems engineering. Users want to be able to customize software behavior through reference to terms familiar to their diverse needs and experience. We present a requirements-driven approach to behavioral customization of software systems. Goal models are constructed to represent alternative behaviors that users can exhibit to achieve their goals. Customization information is then added to restrict the space of possibilities to those that fit specific users, contexts or situations. Meanwhile, elements of the goal model are mapped to units of source code. This way, customization preferences posed at the requirements level are directly translated into system customizations. Our approach, which we apply to an on-line shopping cart system, does not assume adoption of a particular development methodology, platform or variability implementation technique and keeps the reasoning computation overhead from interfering with execution of the configured application.',16,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7236,5,4,2,'Tong:\r\nWhy not \"MDA\"?','',26,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7237,13,4,NULL,'','Requirements specifications seldom allow software and system architects to understand the business goals for a system. Architects need that information in order to design an appropriate architecture for the problem at hand. In this paper, we present a lightweight method based on goal oriented requirements engineering that begins with a canonical list of business goals and elicits specific business goals from the perspective of various stakeholders. It then interprets those business goals in terms of the quality attribute requirements that are so important to software architectures. Experience with using this method for a Boeing Air Transport System is presented. ',10,'done',0,'proposals, metaStudy, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7238,NULL,4,NULL,'workshop','',11,'notDone',0,'',1),(7239,NULL,4,NULL,'','',11,'done',0,'',1),(7240,13,4,NULL,'','',6,'done',0,'evalCE, evalSurvey',0),(7241,5,4,-1,'','As an important phase in software development, domain modeling can be used to construct reusable domain assets based on common domain requirements. In service- oriented software development, domain modeling is essential to satisfy users’ personalized requirements in a short time and at a low cost. We have proposed a method named O-RGPS for service-oriented domain modeling. In O-RGPS, goal models and process models are two kinds of important domain models that have tight relations. However, process modeling is not an easy task in domain modeling since the process models are usually very complicated, and some properties and relations have the risk of being missed. Towards this problem, this paper proposes an automatic process model generation approach by transforming the goal model. Algorithms for generating process models are designed by sufficiently analyzing decomposition and dependence relations in the goal model and transforming these relations into the process model. Furthermore, the method has been realized in a domain modeling prototype, which aims at helping domain experts in domain modeling. The experiments show that this method can help to reduce modeling time and improve the quality of models during creating process models.',9,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7242,24,4,-1,'','',7,'done',0,'',1),(7243,17,4,5,'Could leave General as well. ','',15,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCE, evalSurvey',0),(7244,NULL,4,NULL,'','',5,'done',0,'',1),(7245,9,4,2,'','',3,'done',0,'',1),(7246,NULL,4,NULL,'This paper is in Chinese','',6,'done',0,'',1),(7247,11,4,2,'','This paper presents an architecture driven requirements engineering method. We will demonstrate how to integrate requirements engineering in architecture design and we will demonstrate how to use enterprise architectures during solution realization projects. We will demonstrate how architecture can be used during problem investigation, solution specification and solution validation through an example application.',20,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7248,10,4,2,'','',11,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7249,8,4,NULL,'RECSS','Large software systems are often deployed putting together many Commercial-Off-The-Shelf software components (COTS). The selection of the COTS to be integrated is driven by the software system requirements. In this paper, we propose the RECSS method aimed at supporting requirements elicitation and analysis in the context of COTS-based software systems. RECSS builds a goal model of the system environment which identifies the external elements that interact with it. Next, the system is decomposed into actors for which ISO/IEC-based\r\nquality models are built. As part of the process, environmental and platform characteristics that influence the behaviour of the system are identified. Last, the resulting artefacts are used to analyse and refine the system requirements. ',7,'problems',0,'proposals',0),(7250,NULL,4,NULL,'due to page limit','',1,'notDone',0,'',1),(7251,27,4,6,'','',12,'done',0,'',1),(7252,17,4,3,'','',8,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7253,16,4,3,'','This work presents a new approach to the analysis and verification of the time requirements of Web Services compositions via goal-driven models and model checking techniques. The goal-driven model used is an extension of the goal model KAOS and the model checker engine is the UPPAAL tool. The goal model specifies the properties that the system must satisfy and how they should be verified by using the model checker engine. In order to illustrate this approach, we apply these techniques to a basic Internet purchase process.',14,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, extensions',0),(7254,6,4,NULL,'','',7,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7255,34,4,NULL,'','Threat modeling provides a good foundation for the specification of security requirements during application development. When applied during the early phases of software development, threat modeling empowers developers in several ways. These range from verifying application architecture, identifying and evaluating threats, designing countermeasures, to penetration testing based on a threat model. There\r\nis however paucity of established techniques and tools for threat modeling and analysis. This paper proposes a goal-oriented approach to security threat modeling and analysis by using visual model elements to explicitly capture threat-related concepts. We introduce the notions of negative softgoals for representing threats and inverse contributions for\r\nevaluating design alternatives during analysis, while adapting the formal semantics of the NFR Framework. An analysis procedure is also provided to guide context-sensitive selection of countermeasures. The significance of this approach derives from the strength of the underlining analysis framework. We illustrate this approach by modeling and analyzing the security threats of an online banking system.',7,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions',0),(7256,3,4,1,'','',4,'done',0,'proposals',0),(7257,45,4,1,'','',12,'problems',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7258,NULL,4,NULL,'This is a local conference paper','',4,'done',0,'',1),(7259,88,4,-1,'The name has a problem: On feature interactions...','Web services promise to allow businesses to adapt rapidly to changes in the business environment, and the needs of different customers. However, the rapid introduction of new services paired with the dynamicity of the business environment also leads to undesirable interactions that negatively impact service quality and user satisfaction. In this paper, we propose an approach for modeling such undesirable interactions as feature interactions. As each functional feature is ultimately motivated by non-functional requirements, we make an explicit distinction between functional and non-functional features. We then describe our approach for detecting and resolving feature inter- actions among web services. The approach is based on goal-oriented analysis and scenario modeling. It allows us to reason about feature interactions in terms of goal conflicts and feature deployment. Three case studies illustrate the approach. The paper concludes with a discussion of our findings and an outlook on future research.',25,'problems',0,'proposals, evalCaseStudy',0),(7260,NULL,4,NULL,NULL,NULL,17,'notDone',0,'',0),(7261,NULL,4,NULL,'I think the paper is in','',11,'notDone',0,'',1),(7262,42,4,3,'Why softgoals?','',15,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7263,20,4,-1,'','',14,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7264,7,3,NULL,'','',33,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7265,11,3,-1,'Tong:\r\nPaper type\r\nWhy \"case study\": real example of smart grid\r\nWhy \"Scalability\": ok\r\nTopic\r\nWhy not \"Architecture\"\r\nWhy not \"Pattern\": why pattern? (evellin)',' ',46,'problems',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7266,NULL,3,NULL,'','',NULL,'notDone',0,'',1),(7267,NULL,3,NULL,'','',6,'notDone',0,'',1),(7268,6,3,-1,'This paper applies iStar, NFR, and KAOS to CSCW to determine which is better. Is this an application to a new area? the evaluation is they model the same domain with these three. what type of evaluation is this?\r\n\r\nTong:\r\nSince they use goal modelling techniques to model requirements of a particular type of system, to me, this is not an application to a new down.\r\nTopic\r\nWhy not \"Agents\"?','',16,'notDone',0,'metaStudy, applications',0),(7269,17,3,-1,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions',0),(7270,14,3,NULL,'why not implementation?','',20,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7271,8,3,-1,'','In their current scope, existing business process modeling methods and techniques lack comprehensive constructs for representing some of the essential business concepts, including business goals, non-functional requirements and resources. Chances are, there will never be a single technique that adequately captures all the business concepts on a single diagram. This paper has two related purposes: First, it evaluates the modeling capabilities of process modeling tech- niques against the Zachman Framework. Second, it proposes a multi-perspective integration framework for bridging the identified gaps using other requirements modeling techniques such as goal-oriented and data-oriented techniques. A real world case study is then used to demonstrate the integration process. Ultimately, our framework aims at supporting the creation of comprehensive models and facilitating a common understanding of business perspectives regardless of how they are represented.',7,'done',0,'proposals, evalCaseStudy',0),(7272,16,3,-1,'why formalization? ','',14,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCE',0),(7273,5,3,1,'','This paper describes the application of requirements engineering concepts to\r\nsupport the analysis of the impact of new software systems on system-wide goals.\r\nRequirements on a new or revised software component of a socio-technical system not\r\nonly have implications on the goals of the subsystem itself, but they also impact upon\r\nthe goals of the existing integrated system. In industries such as air traffic\r\nmanagement and healthcare, impacts need to be identified and demonstrated in order\r\nto assess concerns such as risk, safety, and accuracy.\r\nA method called PiLGRIM was developed which integrates means-end\r\nrelationships within goal modelling with knowledge associated with the application\r\ndomain. The relationship between domain knowledge and requirements, as described\r\nin a satisfaction argument, adds traceability rationale to help determine the impacts\r\nof new requirements across a network of heterogeneous actors. We report procedures\r\nthat human analysts follow to use the concepts of satisfaction arguments in a software\r\ntool for i* goal modelling. Results were demonstrated using models and arguments\r\ndeveloped in two case studies, each featuring a distinct socio-technical system – a\r\nnew controlled airspace infringement detection tool for NATS (the UKs air\r\nnavigation service provider), and a new version of the UKs HIV/AIDS patient\r\nreporting system. Results provided evidence towards our claims that the conceptual\r\nintegration of i* and satisfaction arguments is usable and useful to human analysts,\r\nand that the PiLGRIM impact analysis procedures and tool support are effective and\r\nscalable to model and analyse large and complex socio-technical systems. ',27,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7274,5,3,-1,'','',20,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions, interpretations, evalSurvey',0),(7275,7,3,NULL,'','',3,'done',0,'proposals, extensions, applications',0),(7276,15,3,2,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, evalBenchmark, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7277,7,3,-1,'','[Context and motivation] Self-adaptive systems (SAS) monitor and adapt to changing end-user requirements, operating context conditions, and resource availability. Specifying requirements for such dynamic systems is not trivial. Most of the research on self-adaptive systems (SAS) focuses on finding solutions to the requirements that SAS is built for. However, elicitation and representation of requirements for SAS has received less attention at early stages of requirements engineering (RE). [Question/problem] How to represent requirements for SAS in a way which can be read by non-engineering stakeholders? [Principal ideas/results] A requirements modeling language with a diagrammatic syntax to be used to elicit and represent requirements for SAS and perform analysis based on our recently proposed core ontology to perform RE for SAS. [Contribution] A modeling language, called Adaptive RML, for the representation of early requirements for Self-adaptive systems (SAS). The language has graphical primitives in line with classical goal modeling languages and is formalized via a mapping to Techne. Early validation is performed by modeling the same case study in an established goal modeling language and in Adaptive RML. The results suggest that context and resource concepts, as well as relegation and influence relations should be part of graphical modeling languages used to make early requirements models for SAS and to perform analysis over them.',16,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions',0),(7278,7,3,1,'','',14,'done',0,'implementations',0),(7279,NULL,3,NULL,'','',11,'notDone',0,'',1),(7280,NULL,3,NULL,'poster and demo paper','',1,'notDone',0,'',1),(7281,6,3,-1,'','',16,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalSurvey, evalCaseStudy',0),(7282,6,3,NULL,'','',16,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7283,NULL,3,NULL,'Although the venue type here says that the paper is a conference paper, i looked for it and it is a i* workshop paper.','',2,'notDone',0,'',1),(7284,9,3,2,'','',10,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, extensions',0),(7285,NULL,3,NULL,'','',3,'notDone',0,'',1),(7286,NULL,3,NULL,'','',3,'notDone',0,'',1),(7287,NULL,3,NULL,'','',15,'done',0,'',1),(7288,NULL,3,NULL,'This paper has only two pages','',1,'done',0,'',1),(7289,NULL,3,NULL,'The paper is written in French.','',15,'done',0,'',1),(7290,7,3,-1,'','',5,'done',0,'proposals, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7291,NULL,3,NULL,'','Paper not found',11,'problems',0,'',0),(7292,8,3,3,'why not early requirements? ','',26,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, integrations, extensions',0),(7293,14,3,1,'','',2,'done',0,'',1),(7294,9,3,4,'This paper survey RE approaches, including goal models, but not limited to goal models.','',8,'done',0,'proposals, metaStudy',0),(7295,NULL,3,NULL,'workshop paper','',5,'notDone',0,'',1),(7296,NULL,3,NULL,'workshop','',10,'notDone',0,'',1),(7297,NULL,3,NULL,'Paper not found\r\n\r\nThis is an European conference and should be out','',11,'problems',0,'',1),(7298,NULL,3,NULL,'European conference','',5,'notDone',0,'',1),(7299,8,3,-1,'Tong:\r\nWhy not \"ERE\"','',6,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, interpretations',0),(7300,4,3,NULL,'It does not talk about requirements at all, but does use goal model, should we exclude it?','',15,'problems',0,'proposals, implementations',0),(7301,25,3,-1,'no preference on topic definition','Soft constraints extend classical constraints to deal with non-functional requirements, over- constrained problems and preferences. Bistarelli, Montanari and Rossi have developed a very elegant and abstract semiring based theory of soft constraints where many different kinds of soft constraints can be represented and combined in a uniform way over so-called constraint semirings. In this paper we present a framework for prototyping of soft con- straints a` la Bistarelli, Montanari and Rossi in Rewriting Logic. As a case study we present an application of soft constraints to the new area of software-defined radio networks. We model the problem of “optimalâ€ parameter assignments for software-defined radios as a soft constraint solving problem, prove the correctness of the constraint solving algorithm, implement the solution in our prototypical Rewriting Logic framework for soft constraints, and embed our soft constraint solver in SRI’s Policy-Aware, Goal-Oriented Distributed Architecture (PAGODA) for modelling radio networks.',16,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7302,22,3,NULL,'','',8,'done',0,'evalCaseStudy, applications',0),(7303,NULL,3,NULL,'','',4,'done',0,'',1),(7304,8,3,1,'','',7,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations',0),(7305,4,3,2,'','',5,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, extensions',0),(7306,3,3,3,'','',8,'done',0,'proposals, integrations, evalCaseStudy',0),(7307,3,3,2,'The paper has only 2 pages','',1,'notDone',0,'',1),(7308,NULL,3,NULL,'','',1,'notDone',0,'',1),(7309,47,3,NULL,'','The goals of developing systems better, faster, and cheaper\r\ncontinue to drive software engineering practitioners and\r\nresearchers to investigate software engineering methodologies. In\r\nrequirements engineering, the focus has been on modeling the\r\nsoftware engineering process and products for systems that are\r\nbeing built from scratch. As the size and complexity of systems\r\ncontinues to grow the use of commercial off the shelf (COTS)\r\ncomponents is being viewed more and more as a promising, and\r\nalso perhaps inevitable, solution. The effective use of COTS\r\ncomponents, however, requires a systematic approach that\r\nprovides a set of concepts for modeling the subject matter, a set of\r\nguidelines for using such concepts, and tool support to assist the\r\ndeveloper.\r\nIn this paper, we present a COTS-Aware Requirements\r\nEngineering (CARE) approach that explicitly supports the use of\r\nCOTS components. Our CARE approach is knowledge based, has\r\na defined process, and is agent- and goal-oriented. In particular,\r\nwe present part of our meta-model for the knowledge base and a\r\nprototype of the CARE Assistant Tool. Our CARE approach is\r\nvalidated using a part of a Digital Library System example. ',7,'problems',0,'proposals, formalizations, implementations, integrations, interpretations, evalCaseStudy, evalScalability',0),(7310,NULL,3,NULL,'SEDECS: Second international workshop on software engineering decision support','',5,'notDone',0,'',1),(7311,23,3,4,'goal-orientation not as intended by us','',7,'done',0,'',1),(7312,23,3,NULL,'','',14,'done',0,'proposals, formalizations',0),(7313,5,2,NULL,'','Successful implementation of an enterprise strategy, the reorganization of an enterprise, the successful enterprise-wide adoption of a new enterprise resource planning system, or simply being able to manage the daily operations at an enterprise in general are all common examples of organizational actions that are strongly interrelated with the achievement of goals related to these actions. From the research as presented in this paper, it becomes clear that it is not elementary to clearly formulate goals and to understand how to achieve them. In two use scenarios, it is described how the executive board of a mid-sized bank in Germany wants to achieve their overall goal to increase the bank appraisal. The first scenario deals with determining who is responsible for goal creation and accomplishment, while the second scenario deals with describing a concrete goal system. A domain-specific modelling language (DSML) for designing goal models is proposed that provides solutions for requirements that are derived from the described scenarios. This DSML is coined the ‘goal modelling language’ (GoalML), which enables the development of goal models from multiple perspectives in order to relate goals with their context and vice versa.',15,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7314,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7315,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,35,'notDone',0,'',0),(7316,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7317,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7318,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,16,'notDone',0,'',0),(7319,6,2,2,'','Goal Oriented Modelling (GOM) has proved very useful in Software Engineering. KAOS is a popular language for GOM, and has been applied in requirement analysis, specification, and elicitation. Model Based Software Engineering (MBSE) technologies have traditionally addressed the what and how of systems but have offered little support for why. A solution is to extend MBSE languages with GOM, and KAOS in particular, thereby allowing goals to take part in model transformation and analysis. However, there is no complete Meta-Model for KAOS that would be suitable for such an integration. This paper analyses existing work on KAOS language definition and consolidates it into a single Meta-Model, defined in Ecore, that is suitable as a basis for MBSE; and then implements a Graphical Editor for the Meta-Model using MBSE Techniques. The Graphical Editor is applied to model a case study described in the paper. Our Meta-Model is validated by showing how OCL can be used to encode the definition of the completeness of a KAOS model.',9,'done',0,'proposals, implementations, extensions, evalCaseStudy',0),(7320,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7321,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,2,'notDone',0,'',0),(7322,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7323,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7324,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7325,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7326,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7327,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7328,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7329,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7330,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7331,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7332,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,2,'notDone',0,'',0),(7333,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7334,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7335,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7336,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7337,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7338,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,17,'notDone',0,'',0),(7339,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,20,'notDone',0,'',0),(7340,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7341,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7342,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7343,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7344,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7345,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7346,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7347,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7348,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7349,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7350,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7351,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7352,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7353,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7354,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7355,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7356,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7357,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7358,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7359,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7360,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7361,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7362,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7363,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7364,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,23,'notDone',0,'',0),(7365,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7366,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7367,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7368,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7369,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7370,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,27,'notDone',0,'',0),(7371,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7372,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7373,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7374,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7375,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7376,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7377,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7378,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7379,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7380,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,22,'notDone',0,'',0),(7381,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7382,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7383,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7384,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7385,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7386,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7387,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7388,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7389,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7390,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7391,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7392,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7393,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7394,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7395,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7396,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,19,'notDone',0,'',0),(7397,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7398,NULL,2,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7399,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,29,'notDone',0,'',0),(7400,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,19,'notDone',0,'',0),(7401,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,17,'notDone',0,'',0),(7402,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7403,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7404,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7405,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,21,'notDone',0,'',0),(7406,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7407,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7408,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7409,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7410,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7411,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,27,'notDone',0,'',0),(7412,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7413,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7414,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7415,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7416,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,18,'notDone',0,'',0),(7417,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7418,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7419,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7420,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7421,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7422,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7423,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,22,'notDone',0,'',0),(7424,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7425,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,16,'notDone',0,'',0),(7426,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7427,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7428,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,23,'notDone',0,'',0),(7429,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,25,'notDone',0,'',0),(7430,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7431,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,16,'notDone',0,'',0),(7432,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,18,'notDone',0,'',0),(7433,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7434,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7435,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7436,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7437,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7438,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7439,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7440,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7441,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,2,'notDone',0,'',0),(7442,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7443,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,17,'notDone',0,'',0),(7444,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7445,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7446,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7447,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7448,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7449,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7450,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,21,'notDone',0,'',0),(7451,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7452,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7453,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7454,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7455,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7456,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7457,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7458,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7459,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7460,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7461,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7462,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7463,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7464,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7465,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7466,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7467,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7468,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7469,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7470,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7471,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7472,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7473,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7474,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7475,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7476,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7477,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7478,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7479,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,17,'notDone',0,'',0),(7480,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7481,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7482,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7483,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7484,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7485,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,28,'notDone',0,'',0),(7486,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7487,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7488,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7489,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7490,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7491,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7492,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7493,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7494,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7495,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,27,'notDone',0,'',0),(7496,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7497,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7498,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7499,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7500,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7501,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7502,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7503,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7504,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7505,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7506,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7507,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7508,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7509,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7510,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7511,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7512,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7513,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7514,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7515,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7516,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7517,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7518,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7519,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7520,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7521,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7522,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7523,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7524,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7525,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7526,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7527,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7528,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7529,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7530,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7531,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7532,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7533,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7534,NULL,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7535,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,37,'notDone',0,'',0),(7536,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7537,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7538,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,16,'notDone',0,'',0),(7539,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7540,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7541,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7542,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,35,'notDone',0,'',0),(7543,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7544,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7545,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,19,'notDone',0,'',0),(7546,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7547,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7548,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7549,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7550,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,41,'notDone',0,'',0),(7551,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7552,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,18,'notDone',0,'',0),(7553,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7554,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7555,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7556,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,18,'notDone',0,'',0),(7557,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7558,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7559,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7560,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7561,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7562,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7563,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7564,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7565,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7566,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7567,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7568,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7569,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7570,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7571,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7572,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7573,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7574,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,26,'notDone',0,'',0),(7575,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7576,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7577,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7578,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,16,'notDone',0,'',0),(7579,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7580,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,20,'notDone',0,'',0),(7581,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7582,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,20,'notDone',0,'',0),(7583,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7584,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7585,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7586,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7587,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7588,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7589,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,21,'notDone',0,'',0),(7590,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7591,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7592,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7593,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,18,'notDone',0,'',0),(7594,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7595,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7596,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7597,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7598,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7599,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7600,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7601,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7602,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7603,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7604,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7605,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,21,'notDone',0,'',0),(7606,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7607,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7608,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7609,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7610,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7611,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7612,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7613,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,31,'notDone',0,'',0),(7614,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7615,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7616,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7617,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7618,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7619,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7620,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7621,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7622,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7623,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7624,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7625,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7626,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7627,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7628,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7629,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7630,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7631,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,16,'notDone',0,'',0),(7632,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7633,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7634,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7635,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7636,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7637,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7638,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7639,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7640,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7641,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7642,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7643,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7644,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7645,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7646,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7647,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7648,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7649,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7650,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7651,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7652,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7653,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7654,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7655,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7656,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,23,'notDone',0,'',0),(7657,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7658,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7659,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,16,'notDone',0,'',0),(7660,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7661,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7662,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7663,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7664,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7665,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7666,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7667,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7668,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7669,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7670,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7671,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,26,'notDone',0,'',0),(7672,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7673,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7674,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7675,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7676,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7677,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,19,'notDone',0,'',0),(7678,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,19,'notDone',0,'',0),(7679,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7680,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7681,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7682,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7683,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7684,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7685,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7686,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7687,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7688,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7689,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7690,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,18,'notDone',0,'',0),(7691,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7692,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7693,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7694,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,18,'notDone',0,'',0),(7695,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7696,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7697,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7698,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,20,'notDone',0,'',0),(7699,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7700,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7701,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7702,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7703,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,17,'notDone',0,'',0),(7704,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,2,'notDone',0,'',0),(7705,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7706,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7707,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7708,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7709,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7710,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7711,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7712,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7713,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7714,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7715,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7716,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7717,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7718,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7719,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7720,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7721,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7722,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7723,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7724,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7725,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7726,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7727,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7728,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,23,'notDone',0,'',0),(7729,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7730,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7731,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,17,'notDone',0,'',0),(7732,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7733,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7734,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7735,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7736,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,27,'notDone',0,'',0),(7737,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7738,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7739,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7740,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7741,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7742,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7743,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7744,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7745,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7746,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7747,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7748,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7749,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7750,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7751,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7752,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7753,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7754,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7755,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7756,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7757,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7758,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7759,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7760,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7761,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,24,'notDone',0,'',0),(7762,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7763,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7764,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7765,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7766,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7767,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7768,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7769,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7770,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7771,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7772,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7773,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7774,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7775,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7776,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7777,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7778,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7779,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7780,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7781,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7782,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7783,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7784,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7785,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7786,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7787,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7788,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7789,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7790,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7791,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7792,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7793,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7794,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,383,'notDone',0,'',0),(7795,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7796,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7797,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7798,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7799,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7800,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7801,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7802,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7803,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7804,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7805,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7806,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7807,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7808,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7809,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7810,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7811,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7812,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,15,'notDone',0,'',0),(7813,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7814,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7815,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7816,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7817,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,2,'notDone',0,'',0),(7818,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7819,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7820,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7821,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7822,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7823,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7824,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7825,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7826,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7827,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7828,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7829,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7830,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7831,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7832,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7833,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7834,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7835,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7836,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7837,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7838,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7839,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7840,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7841,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7842,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7843,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7844,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7845,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7846,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7847,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7848,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7849,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7850,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7851,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7852,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,17,'notDone',0,'',0),(7853,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7854,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7855,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7856,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7857,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7858,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7859,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7860,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7861,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7862,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7863,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7864,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7865,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7866,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7867,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7868,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,4,'notDone',0,'',0),(7869,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7870,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7871,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7872,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7873,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7874,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7875,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7876,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7877,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7878,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7879,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7880,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7881,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7882,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7883,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7884,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7885,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7886,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7887,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7888,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7889,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7890,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7891,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7892,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7893,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7894,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7895,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7896,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7897,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7898,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7899,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,3,'notDone',0,'',0),(7900,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7901,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7902,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7903,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7904,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7905,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,2,'notDone',0,'',0),(7906,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7907,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,14,'notDone',0,'',0),(7908,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,8,'notDone',0,'',0),(7909,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7910,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7911,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7912,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7913,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,12,'notDone',0,'',0),(7914,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7915,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,6,'notDone',0,'',0),(7916,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7917,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7918,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,11,'notDone',0,'',0),(7919,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0,'notDone',0,'',0),(7920,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7921,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,13,'notDone',0,'',0),(7922,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,9,'notDone',0,'',0),(7923,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,24,'notDone',0,'',0),(7924,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0),(7925,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,'notDone',0,'',0),(7926,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,7,'notDone',0,'',0),(7927,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,10,'notDone',0,'',0),(7928,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,5,'notDone',0,'',0);

--
-- Table structure for table `surveyPapers_has_frameworks`
--

CREATE TABLE `surveyPapers_has_frameworks` (
  `surveyPaper_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `framework_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`surveyPaper_id`,`framework_id`),
  KEY `fk_surveyPaper_has_framework_framework1_idx` (`framework_id`),
  KEY `fk_surveyPaper_has_framework_surveyPaper1_idx` (`surveyPaper_id`),
  CONSTRAINT `fk_surveyPaper_has_framework_framework1` FOREIGN KEY (`framework_id`) REFERENCES `frameworks` (`ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
  CONSTRAINT `fk_surveyPaper_has_framework_surveyPaper1` FOREIGN KEY (`surveyPaper_id`) REFERENCES `surveyPapers` (`ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `surveyPapers_has_frameworks`
--

INSERT INTO `surveyPapers_has_frameworks` VALUES (6960,24),(6963,24),(6989,24),(6997,24),(7004,24),(7026,24),(7058,24),(7064,24),(7076,24),(7081,24),(7140,24),(7155,24),(7165,24),(7166,24),(7172,24),(7268,24),(7292,24),(7302,24),(6961,25),(6964,25),(6966,25),(6968,25),(6979,25),(6982,25),(6983,25),(7000,25),(7003,25),(7005,25),(7007,25),(7013,25),(7038,25),(7042,25),(7052,25),(7056,25),(7066,25),(7092,25),(7102,25),(7118,25),(7151,25),(7152,25),(7160,25),(7193,25),(7205,25),(7211,25),(7252,25),(7253,25),(7275,25),(7276,25),(7282,25),(7290,25),(7319,25),(6962,26),(6967,26),(6972,26),(6973,26),(6974,26),(6980,26),(6987,26),(6991,26),(7001,26),(7002,26),(7009,26),(7015,26),(7023,26),(7034,26),(7040,26),(7041,26),(7043,26),(7054,26),(7060,26),(7061,26),(7070,26),(7073,26),(7084,26),(7090,26),(7108,26),(7109,26),(7114,26),(7116,26),(7129,26),(7130,26),(7135,26),(7138,26),(7143,26),(7150,26),(7162,26),(7179,26),(7180,26),(7190,26),(7199,26),(7202,26),(7204,26),(7207,26),(7210,26),(7217,26),(7218,26),(7226,26),(7228,26),(7235,26),(7241,26),(7256,26),(7269,26),(7271,26),(7281,26),(7300,26),(7301,26),(7306,26),(6969,27),(6976,27),(6978,27),(6988,27),(7014,27),(7071,27),(7074,27),(7096,27),(7098,27),(7206,27),(7219,27),(7240,27),(7277,27),(6984,28),(6965,29),(6996,29),(7006,29),(7008,29),(7016,29),(7018,29),(7020,29),(7022,29),(7024,29),(7031,29),(7046,29),(7049,29),(7053,29),(7065,29),(7077,29),(7085,29),(7105,29),(7125,29),(7132,29),(7134,29),(7144,29),(7145,29),(7147,29),(7159,29),(7168,29),(7170,29),(7175,29),(7176,29),(7181,29),(7216,29),(7236,29),(7249,29),(7264,29),(7265,29),(7284,29),(7299,29),(6995,30),(6998,30),(7063,30),(7247,30),(6970,32),(7019,32),(7030,32),(7036,32),(7153,32),(7156,32),(7189,32),(7220,32),(7231,32),(7233,32),(7254,32),(7255,32),(7274,32),(7294,32),(6971,33),(6986,33),(6993,33),(7126,33),(7169,33),(7259,33),(7094,34),(7163,35),(6999,36),(7035,37),(7032,38),(7044,39),(6985,40),(7021,41),(7062,42),(7051,43),(7080,44),(7069,45),(7075,46),(7099,47),(7117,48),(7123,49),(7012,53),(7086,53),(7270,53),(7171,54),(7183,55),(7158,56),(7201,56),(7227,56),(7237,57),(7120,59),(7174,60),(7091,61),(7110,61),(7121,61),(7273,62),(7309,63),(7186,64),(7198,65),(7222,66),(6977,67),(7093,68),(7141,69),(7025,70),(7059,71),(7037,73),(7055,74),(7079,75),(7097,76),(7103,77),(7278,77),(7304,78),(7133,79),(7139,80),(7119,81),(6975,82),(6981,82),(7137,82),(7200,82),(7248,82),(7263,82),(7164,83),(7313,84),(7203,85),(7215,86),(7128,87),(7185,87),(7089,88),(7262,88),(7196,89),(7305,90),(7311,91),(7272,92),(7106,93),(7173,94),(7197,95),(7257,96),(7243,97),(7312,98),(7029,99),(7154,100),(7047,101),(7167,103),(7223,104);

--
-- Table structure for table `surveyPapers_has_topics`
--

CREATE TABLE `surveyPapers_has_topics` (
  `surveyPaper_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `topic_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`surveyPaper_id`,`topic_id`),
  KEY `fk_surveyPaper_has_topic_topic1_idx` (`topic_id`),
  KEY `fk_surveyPaper_has_topic_surveyPaper1_idx` (`surveyPaper_id`),
  CONSTRAINT `fk_surveyPaper_has_topic_surveyPaper1` FOREIGN KEY (`surveyPaper_id`) REFERENCES `surveyPapers` (`ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
  CONSTRAINT `fk_surveyPaper_has_topic_topic1` FOREIGN KEY (`topic_id`) REFERENCES `topics` (`ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `surveyPapers_has_topics`
--

INSERT INTO `surveyPapers_has_topics` VALUES (6960,2),(6961,2),(6962,2),(6965,2),(6966,2),(6967,2),(6968,2),(6969,2),(6975,2),(6976,2),(6977,2),(6978,2),(6979,2),(6981,2),(6984,2),(6985,2),(6986,2),(6988,2),(6996,2),(7000,2),(7001,2),(7002,2),(7003,2),(7007,2),(7008,2),(7009,2),(7012,2),(7014,2),(7015,2),(7016,2),(7019,2),(7021,2),(7023,2),(7024,2),(7025,2),(7026,2),(7029,2),(7031,2),(7035,2),(7037,2),(7038,2),(7040,2),(7043,2),(7047,2),(7049,2),(7052,2),(7054,2),(7055,2),(7060,2),(7061,2),(7064,2),(7073,2),(7074,2),(7075,2),(7076,2),(7084,2),(7085,2),(7086,2),(7090,2),(7091,2),(7092,2),(7099,2),(7102,2),(7105,2),(7106,2),(7108,2),(7117,2),(7118,2),(7119,2),(7125,2),(7126,2),(7128,2),(7129,2),(7130,2),(7132,2),(7133,2),(7135,2),(7137,2),(7138,2),(7139,2),(7143,2),(7145,2),(7154,2),(7155,2),(7156,2),(7159,2),(7160,2),(7162,2),(7163,2),(7165,2),(7169,2),(7173,2),(7175,2),(7189,2),(7193,2),(7196,2),(7197,2),(7198,2),(7200,2),(7202,2),(7203,2),(7204,2),(7205,2),(7207,2),(7220,2),(7228,2),(7231,2),(7233,2),(7235,2),(7241,2),(7248,2),(7253,2),(7254,2),(7257,2),(7264,2),(7265,2),(7269,2),(7270,2),(7272,2),(7273,2),(7274,2),(7276,2),(7278,2),(7284,2),(7301,2),(7302,2),(7305,2),(7309,2),(7312,2),(7319,2),(6960,3),(6964,3),(6965,3),(6966,3),(6969,3),(6971,3),(6972,3),(6975,3),(6976,3),(6978,3),(6988,3),(7000,3),(7009,3),(7012,3),(7016,3),(7019,3),(7021,3),(7023,3),(7024,3),(7029,3),(7030,3),(7036,3),(7046,3),(7056,3),(7060,3),(7073,3),(7074,3),(7075,3),(7076,3),(7086,3),(7098,3),(7103,3),(7105,3),(7108,3),(7116,3),(7129,3),(7132,3),(7134,3),(7147,3),(7158,3),(7165,3),(7175,3),(7176,3),(7179,3),(7183,3),(7186,3),(7206,3),(7210,3),(7223,3),(7231,3),(7236,3),(7249,3),(7264,3),(7277,3),(7278,3),(7290,3),(7292,3),(7299,3),(7302,3),(6960,10),(6961,10),(6963,10),(6964,10),(6965,10),(6966,10),(6968,10),(6969,10),(6975,10),(6976,10),(6978,10),(6979,10),(6981,10),(6982,10),(6983,10),(6984,10),(6988,10),(6993,10),(6995,10),(6996,10),(6997,10),(7000,10),(7003,10),(7005,10),(7006,10),(7008,10),(7013,10),(7014,10),(7018,10),(7021,10),(7022,10),(7023,10),(7024,10),(7030,10),(7032,10),(7036,10),(7038,10),(7042,10),(7044,10),(7046,10),(7047,10),(7053,10),(7055,10),(7056,10),(7059,10),(7062,10),(7063,10),(7064,10),(7065,10),(7071,10),(7074,10),(7076,10),(7077,10),(7080,10),(7085,10),(7089,10),(7090,10),(7091,10),(7092,10),(7093,10),(7096,10),(7097,10),(7098,10),(7103,10),(7105,10),(7108,10),(7110,10),(7114,10),(7116,10),(7125,10),(7126,10),(7128,10),(7129,10),(7132,10),(7134,10),(7135,10),(7140,10),(7141,10),(7144,10),(7145,10),(7150,10),(7151,10),(7153,10),(7154,10),(7155,10),(7162,10),(7163,10),(7164,10),(7165,10),(7166,10),(7167,10),(7168,10),(7169,10),(7170,10),(7171,10),(7173,10),(7176,10),(7179,10),(7180,10),(7181,10),(7183,10),(7185,10),(7190,10),(7193,10),(7199,10),(7200,10),(7219,10),(7220,10),(7222,10),(7223,10),(7226,10),(7227,10),(7233,10),(7235,10),(7236,10),(7240,10),(7242,10),(7243,10),(7248,10),(7249,10),(7253,10),(7254,10),(7257,10),(7262,10),(7263,10),(7264,10),(7268,10),(7270,10),(7272,10),(7273,10),(7275,10),(7278,10),(7282,10),(7284,10),(7294,10),(7299,10),(7302,10),(7309,10),(6960,11),(6964,11),(6965,11),(6970,11),(6973,11),(6991,11),(6996,11),(7021,11),(7030,11),(7102,11),(7103,11),(7116,11),(7129,11),(7132,11),(7135,11),(7137,11),(7158,11),(7164,11),(7165,11),(7174,11),(7201,11),(7220,11),(7223,11),(7227,11),(7248,11),(7252,11),(7254,11),(7255,11),(7265,11),(7269,11),(7274,11),(7276,11),(7278,11),(6960,17),(6963,17),(6965,17),(6968,17),(6969,17),(6970,17),(6971,17),(6972,17),(6975,17),(6978,17),(6981,17),(6982,17),(6986,17),(6987,17),(6988,17),(6996,17),(6997,17),(6999,17),(7000,17),(7002,17),(7006,17),(7008,17),(7016,17),(7019,17),(7022,17),(7023,17),(7026,17),(7030,17),(7031,17),(7036,17),(7037,17),(7040,17),(7043,17),(7044,17),(7046,17),(7051,17),(7053,17),(7054,17),(7058,17),(7061,17),(7064,17),(7073,17),(7074,17),(7075,17),(7076,17),(7085,17),(7089,17),(7090,17),(7091,17),(7093,17),(7094,17),(7103,17),(7105,17),(7110,17),(7121,17),(7126,17),(7129,17),(7132,17),(7133,17),(7140,17),(7145,17),(7152,17),(7153,17),(7155,17),(7156,17),(7159,17),(7163,17),(7164,17),(7165,17),(7166,17),(7169,17),(7171,17),(7172,17),(7175,17),(7176,17),(7179,17),(7181,17),(7183,17),(7189,17),(7190,17),(7196,17),(7198,17),(7200,17),(7206,17),(7207,17),(7210,17),(7220,17),(7228,17),(7231,17),(7233,17),(7249,17),(7254,17),(7255,17),(7257,17),(7259,17),(7262,17),(7263,17),(7264,17),(7265,17),(7268,17),(7273,17),(7274,17),(7277,17),(7284,17),(7290,17),(7292,17),(7294,17),(7301,17),(7302,17),(7309,17),(6960,18),(6961,18),(6962,18),(6963,18),(6964,18),(6965,18),(6966,18),(6967,18),(6968,18),(6969,18),(6970,18),(6971,18),(6972,18),(6973,18),(6974,18),(6975,18),(6976,18),(6977,18),(6978,18),(6979,18),(6980,18),(6981,18),(6982,18),(6983,18),(6984,18),(6985,18),(6986,18),(6987,18),(6988,18),(6989,18),(6991,18),(6993,18),(6995,18),(6996,18),(6997,18),(6998,18),(6999,18),(7000,18),(7001,18),(7002,18),(7003,18),(7004,18),(7005,18),(7006,18),(7007,18),(7008,18),(7009,18),(7012,18),(7013,18),(7014,18),(7015,18),(7016,18),(7018,18),(7019,18),(7021,18),(7022,18),(7023,18),(7024,18),(7026,18),(7029,18),(7030,18),(7031,18),(7032,18),(7034,18),(7035,18),(7036,18),(7037,18),(7038,18),(7040,18),(7041,18),(7042,18),(7043,18),(7044,18),(7046,18),(7047,18),(7049,18),(7051,18),(7052,18),(7053,18),(7054,18),(7055,18),(7056,18),(7058,18),(7059,18),(7060,18),(7061,18),(7062,18),(7063,18),(7064,18),(7065,18),(7066,18),(7069,18),(7070,18),(7071,18),(7073,18),(7074,18),(7075,18),(7076,18),(7077,18),(7079,18),(7080,18),(7081,18),(7084,18),(7085,18),(7086,18),(7089,18),(7090,18),(7091,18),(7092,18),(7093,18),(7094,18),(7096,18),(7097,18),(7098,18),(7099,18),(7102,18),(7103,18),(7105,18),(7106,18),(7108,18),(7110,18),(7114,18),(7116,18),(7117,18),(7118,18),(7119,18),(7121,18),(7123,18),(7125,18),(7126,18),(7128,18),(7129,18),(7130,18),(7132,18),(7133,18),(7134,18),(7135,18),(7137,18),(7138,18),(7139,18),(7140,18),(7141,18),(7144,18),(7145,18),(7147,18),(7151,18),(7152,18),(7153,18),(7155,18),(7156,18),(7158,18),(7159,18),(7160,18),(7162,18),(7163,18),(7164,18),(7165,18),(7166,18),(7167,18),(7168,18),(7170,18),(7171,18),(7172,18),(7173,18),(7174,18),(7175,18),(7176,18),(7179,18),(7180,18),(7181,18),(7183,18),(7185,18),(7186,18),(7189,18),(7190,18),(7193,18),(7196,18),(7197,18),(7198,18),(7199,18),(7200,18),(7201,18),(7202,18),(7203,18),(7204,18),(7205,18),(7206,18),(7207,18),(7210,18),(7211,18),(7215,18),(7216,18),(7217,18),(7218,18),(7219,18),(7220,18),(7222,18),(7223,18),(7227,18),(7228,18),(7235,18),(7236,18),(7237,18),(7240,18),(7243,18),(7247,18),(7248,18),(7249,18),(7252,18),(7253,18),(7254,18),(7255,18),(7256,18),(7257,18),(7259,18),(7262,18),(7263,18),(7264,18),(7265,18),(7268,18),(7269,18),(7270,18),(7272,18),(7273,18),(7274,18),(7276,18),(7277,18),(7278,18),(7281,18),(7282,18),(7284,18),(7290,18),(7292,18),(7294,18),(7299,18),(7302,18),(7304,18),(7305,18),(7306,18),(7309,18),(7312,18),(7319,18),(6967,20),(6976,20),(6977,20),(6986,20),(6995,20),(6998,20),(6999,20),(7008,20),(7018,20),(7031,20),(7032,20),(7044,20),(7049,20),(7062,20),(7063,20),(7071,20),(7080,20),(7090,20),(7106,20),(7129,20),(7134,20),(7138,20),(7150,20),(7164,20),(7166,20),(7167,20),(7169,20),(7170,20),(7181,20),(7195,20),(7216,20),(7218,20),(7226,20),(7236,20),(7237,20),(7241,20),(7247,20),(7248,20),(7271,20),(7299,20),(7302,20),(7313,20),(6988,21),(7001,21),(7006,21),(7016,21),(7049,21),(7065,21),(7075,21),(7077,21),(7096,21),(7129,21),(7145,21),(7168,21),(7169,21),(7222,21),(7236,21),(7282,21),(7292,21),(7319,21),(6989,23),(7047,23),(7137,23),(7163,23),(7195,23),(7211,23),(7301,23),(6960,25),(6978,25),(6984,25),(6985,25),(6988,25),(6999,25),(7002,25),(7005,25),(7006,25),(7014,25),(7015,25),(7016,25),(7019,25),(7023,25),(7024,25),(7025,25),(7034,25),(7035,25),(7059,25),(7060,25),(7061,25),(7062,25),(7066,25),(7074,25),(7084,25),(7085,25),(7086,25),(7087,25),(7090,25),(7091,25),(7096,25),(7102,25),(7117,25),(7123,25),(7128,25),(7129,25),(7139,25),(7147,25),(7159,25),(7162,25),(7185,25),(7186,25),(7193,25),(7198,25),(7202,25),(7204,25),(7206,25),(7217,25),(7226,25),(7233,25),(7235,25),(7256,25),(7270,25),(7272,25),(7274,25),(7277,25),(7282,25),(7302,25),(7312,25),(6960,27),(6963,27),(6966,27),(6969,27),(6981,27),(6984,27),(6985,27),(6995,27),(6996,27),(7000,27),(7009,27),(7012,27),(7016,27),(7019,27),(7025,27),(7029,27),(7031,27),(7035,27),(7037,27),(7043,27),(7052,27),(7054,27),(7055,27),(7058,27),(7061,27),(7064,27),(7066,27),(7071,27),(7073,27),(7074,27),(7079,27),(7090,27),(7091,27),(7097,27),(7105,27),(7121,27),(7129,27),(7130,27),(7133,27),(7135,27),(7151,27),(7164,27),(7165,27),(7180,27),(7193,27),(7199,27),(7200,27),(7210,27),(7211,27),(7222,27),(7228,27),(7259,27),(7264,27),(7265,27),(7277,27),(7300,27),(7309,27),(6970,29),(6987,29),(6998,29),(7058,29),(7059,29),(7091,29),(7110,29),(7121,29),(7147,29),(7156,29),(7176,29),(7186,29),(7200,29),(7207,29),(7210,29),(6964,30),(6966,30),(6979,30),(6982,30),(6988,30),(7008,30),(7030,30),(7032,30),(7036,30),(7038,30),(7052,30),(7061,30),(7069,30),(7075,30),(7084,30),(7116,30),(7117,30),(7118,30),(7121,30),(7123,30),(7135,30),(7153,30),(7156,30),(7162,30),(7166,30),(7169,30),(7173,30),(7175,30),(7186,30),(7193,30),(7217,30),(7249,30),(7252,30),(7259,30),(7265,30),(7274,30),(7276,30),(7294,30),(6970,31),(6982,31),(6988,31),(6995,31),(6998,31),(7000,31),(7013,31),(7014,31),(7023,31),(7034,31),(7055,31),(7061,31),(7063,31),(7075,31),(7085,31),(7090,31),(7123,31),(7145,31),(7160,31),(7164,31),(7175,31),(7193,31),(7215,31),(7217,31),(7218,31),(7220,31),(7226,31),(7237,31),(7247,31),(7259,31),(7265,31),(7300,31),(7301,31),(7309,31),(7313,31),(6962,33),(6966,33),(6971,33),(6973,33),(6974,33),(6975,33),(6986,33),(6991,33),(6995,33),(7001,33),(7006,33),(7007,33),(7018,33),(7025,33),(7042,33),(7054,33),(7058,33),(7073,33),(7079,33),(7084,33),(7091,33),(7097,33),(7103,33),(7108,33),(7110,33),(7121,33),(7123,33),(7126,33),(7133,33),(7143,33),(7169,33),(7171,33),(7173,33),(7175,33),(7183,33),(7185,33),(7193,33),(7198,33),(7200,33),(7203,33),(7204,33),(7219,33),(7240,33),(7243,33),(7259,33),(7263,33),(7274,33),(7294,33),(7312,33),(6984,34),(7015,34),(7041,34),(7061,34),(7074,34),(7090,34),(7099,34),(7130,34),(7159,34),(7165,34),(7189,34),(7196,34),(7202,34),(7206,34),(7228,34),(7235,34),(7277,34),(7284,34),(7008,35),(7097,35),(7151,35),(7175,35),(7292,35),(6973,36),(6977,36),(6991,36),(7014,36),(7034,36),(7055,36),(7074,36),(7080,36),(7085,36),(7091,36),(7097,36),(7103,36),(7133,36),(7170,36),(7226,36),(7233,36),(7235,36),(7274,36),(7277,36),(7290,36),(7313,36),(7319,36),(7026,40),(7152,40),(7158,40),(7211,40),(7259,40);

--
-- Table structure for table `topics`
--

CREATE TABLE `topics` (
  `ID` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `name` varchar(45) CHARACTER SET utf8 NOT NULL,
  `topic_ID` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
  KEY `fk_topic_topic1_idx` (`topic_ID`),
  CONSTRAINT `fk_topic_topic1` FOREIGN KEY (`topic_ID`) REFERENCES `topics` (`ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=41 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `topics`
--

INSERT INTO `topics` VALUES (2,'Systematic Reasoning',NULL),(3,'Early requirements engineering',NULL),(6,'',NULL),(10,'Agents',NULL),(11,'Security - Privacy - Risk',NULL),(17,'Non-functional requirements - Softgoals',NULL),(18,'Requirements engineering',NULL),(20,'Business Modeling - Business Intelligence',NULL),(21,'Model Driven Development',NULL),(23,'Compliance',NULL),(25,'Adaptation - Variability - Evolution',NULL),(27,'Conflicts',NULL),(29,'Aspects',NULL),(30,'Patterns',NULL),(31,'Architecture',NULL),(32,'Agile',NULL),(33,'Scenario',NULL),(34,'Preference',NULL),(35,'metrics',NULL),(36,'Context',NULL),(37,'bus',NULL),(38,'Ada',NULL),(39,'non',NULL),(40,'agent ',NULL);

--
-- Table structure for table `venues`
--

CREATE TABLE `venues` (
  `ID` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `name` text NOT NULL,
  `type` varchar(45) DEFAULT NULL,
  `year` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `publishers_ID` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
  KEY `fk_venues_publishers1_idx` (`publishers_ID`),
  CONSTRAINT `fk_venues_publishers1` FOREIGN KEY (`publishers_ID`) REFERENCES `publishers` (`ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=5735 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `venues`
--

INSERT INTO `venues` VALUES (5140,'WER','proceedings',2010,21),(5141,'WER','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5142,'WER','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5143,'Americas Conference on Information Systems , AMCIS','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5144,'Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE','proceedings',2005,NULL),(5145,'AMCIS','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5146,'International Conference on Systems Engineering','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5147,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Data Engineering, SEDE','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5148,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2005,NULL),(5149,'Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5150,'Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems, WITS','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5151,'International ELeGI Conference on Advanced Technology for Enhanced Learning','proceedings',2005,NULL),(5152,'IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5153,'Managing Requirements Knowledge, MARK International Workshop on','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5154,'Computer and Information Sciences, ISCIS International Symposium on','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5155,'Software Product Management (IWSPM), International Workshop on','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5156,'Multimedia and Enjoyable Requirements EngineeringBeyond Mere Descriptions and with More Fun and Games, MERE International Workshop on','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5157,'Cybernetic Intelligent Systems, CIS IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5158,'IEEE Signal Processing, Communication and Applications Conference, SIU','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5159,'ServiceOriented Computing: Consequences for Engineering Requirements, SOCCER International Workshop on','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5160,'Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), International Workshop on','proceedings',2009,21),(5161,'ICSE Companion','proceedings',2009,22),(5162,'Software Product Management (IWSPM), International Workshop on','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5163,'IEEE International Advance Computing Conference, IACC','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5164,'Requirements@ Run Time (RE@ RunTime), International Workshop on','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5165,'Web and Requirements Engineering (WeRE), International Workshop on the','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5166,'Industrial and Information Systems (IIS), International Conference on','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5167,'International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science RCIS','proceedings',2010,21),(5168,'Human Interface and the Management of Information Interacting with Information','proceedings',2010,22),(5169,'Requirements Engineering for Social Computing (RESC), International Workshop on','proceedings',2011,21),(5170,'Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT), XXIII International Symposium on','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5171,'IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering','proceedings',2011,22),(5172,'Intelligent Systems and Applications (ISA), International Workshop on','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5173,'Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), International Workshop on','proceedings',2011,21),(5174,'Emerging Technologies (ICET), International Conference on','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5175,'of International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5176,'Computer Science and Service System (CSSS), International Conference on','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5177,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2012,22),(5178,'ModelDriven Requirements Engineering Workshop (MoDRE), IEEE International','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5179,'Requirements Patterns (RePa), IEEE International Workshop on','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5180,'Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), International Workshop on','proceedings',2012,21),(5181,'System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), International Conference','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5182,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5183,'Comparing Requirements Modeling Approaches Workshop (CMA@ RE), International','proceedings',2013,24),(5184,'International Workshop on Games and Software Engineering: Engineering Computer Games to Enable Positive, Progressive Change','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5185,'ModelDriven Requirements Engineering Workshop (MoDRE), IEEE International','proceedings',2013,22),(5186,'International Workshop on the Twin Peaks of Requirements and Architecture, TwinPeaks','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5187,'Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), International Workshop on','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5188,'Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5189,'Artificial Intelligence for Requirements Engineering (AIRE), IEEE International Workshop on','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5190,'Interrelations between Requirements Engineering and Business Process Management (REBPM), IEEE International Workshop on the','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5191,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5192,'ModelDriven Requirements Engineering Workshop (MoDRE), IEEE International','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5193,'Requirements Prioritization and Communication (RePriCo), IEEE International Workshop on','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5194,'Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), IEEE/ACIS International Conference on','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5195,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2008,21),(5196,'Software Engineering and Data Mining (SEDM), International Conference on','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5197,'Requirements Engineering Visualization, REV International Workshop on','proceedings',2007,21),(5198,'Informatica (CLEI), XXXVIII Conferencia Latinoamericana En','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5199,'International Workshop on Software Engineering Challenges for the Smart Grid','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5200,'workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games (PCG ), Raleigh, NC, USA','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5201,'Digital Society, ICDS International Conference on','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5202,'Software Engineering Advances, ICSEA International Conference on','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5203,'International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5204,'Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA), ACIS International Conference on','proceedings',2010,22),(5205,'Information and Telecommunication Technologies (APSITT), AsiaPacific Symposium on','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5206,'European Conference on eLearning (ECEL )','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5207,'ComputerAided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design, CAID/CD International Conference on','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5208,'International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and SelfManaging Systems','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5209,'ACIS','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5210,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2002,25),(5211,'symposia on Metainformatics','proceedings',2005,NULL),(5212,'AOSD workshop on Early aspects','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5213,'proceedings of the Canadian conference on computer science and software engineering','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5214,'International Conference on Semantic Systems','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5215,'International Workshop on Variability Modeling of SoftwareIntensive Systems','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5216,'International C* Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5217,'International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5218,'ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP)','journal',2009,21),(5219,'ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS)','journal',2007,21),(5220,'ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC)','journal',2004,25),(5221,'Computer SecurityESORICS','proceedings',2010,25),(5222,'ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology','journal',2001,25),(5223,'INFORSID','proceedings',2011,21),(5224,'INFORSID','proceedings',2015,NULL),(5225,'Advanced Science Letters','journal',2012,NULL),(5226,'Advances in Information Sciences \\& Service Sciences','journal',2011,NULL),(5227,'of International Conference on Advances in Computing','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5228,'Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications','proceedings',2015,NULL),(5229,'Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing','proceedings',2016,NULL),(5230,'WER','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5231,'Applied clinical informatics','journal',2013,NULL),(5232,'Applied Ontology','proceedings',2015,NULL),(5233,'Availability, Reliability and Security, ARES International Conference on','proceedings',2008,21),(5234,'ACM/IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5235,'IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering','proceedings',2009,21),(5236,'AspectOriented Requirements Engineering','bookChapter',2013,NULL),(5237,'international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5238,'AMCIS','proceedings',2006,NULL),(5239,'AtAutomatisierungstechnik','journal',2013,NULL),(5240,'Automated Software Engineering','journal',2002,21),(5241,'Automated Software Engineering','journal',2008,21),(5242,'Automated Software Engineering','proceedings',2009,23),(5243,'Autonomous Robots','proceedings',2007,21),(5244,'AUTOTESTCON','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5245,'International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design, BMSD','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5246,'Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering','proceedings',2005,21),(5247,'Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5248,'EMMSAD','proceedings',2005,NULL),(5249,'CAiSE (Doctoral Consortium)','proceedings',2006,34),(5250,'iStar','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5251,'CEUR Workshop','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5252,'Information Systems Evolution','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5253,'CAiSE (Doctoral Consortium)','proceedings',2011,21),(5254,'PoEM','proceedings',2012,34),(5255,'International i* Workshop Valencia, Spain, June ,','proceedings',2013,21),(5256,'CIISE','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5257,'International i* Workshop (, to be published)','proceedings',2015,NULL),(5258,'XIII Conferencia Iberoamericana en Software Engineering, CibSE','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5259,'WER','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5260,'CIBSE XVIII IberoAmerican Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2015,NULL),(5261,'Aligning Enterprise, System and Software Architectures','bookChapter',2014,NULL),(5262,'Communications in Computer and Information Science','journal',2014,NULL),(5263,'Contemporary Computing','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5264,'Computer Networks and Information Technologies','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5265,'Computer Applications for Software Engineering, Disaster Recovery, and Business Continuity','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5266,'Communications in Computer and Information Science','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5267,'Requirements Engineering','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5268,'Trustworthy Computing and Services','proceedings',2015,NULL),(5269,'Communications of the ACM','journal',1999,25),(5270,'Computational and Robotic Models of the Hierarchical Organization of Behavior','bookChapter',2013,NULL),(5271,'Computational Mechanics','journal',2014,NULL),(5272,'Computer','journal',1996,21),(5273,'Computer','journal',2013,21),(5274,'Computer and Information Sciences II','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5275,'Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering','journal',2016,NULL),(5276,'Computer Networks','proceedings',2003,24),(5277,'Computer Science Research and Development','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5278,'Computer Software','journal',2012,NULL),(5279,'Computer Standards \\& Interfaces','journal',2015,24),(5280,'Computer Standards \\& Interfaces','proceedings',2011,21),(5281,'International Journal of Computer Systems Science \\& Engineering','journal',2006,36),(5282,'Computer Standards \\& Interfaces','proceedings',1997,NULL),(5283,'IEEE Games, Media, Entertainment Conference, IEEE GEM','proceedings',2015,NULL),(5284,'Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5285,'IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5286,'annual workshop on Cyber security and information intelligence research: developing strategies to meet the cyber security and information intelligence challenges ahead','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5287,'Decision Support Systems','journal',2008,21),(5288,'DMS','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5289,'Generation Data Mining: Towards ServiceOriented Knowledge Discovery (SoKD)','proceedings',2009,21),(5290,'Electronic Commerce Research','journal',2009,23),(5291,'Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science','journal',2007,24),(5292,'Formal Methods in System Design','proceedings',2005,NULL),(5293,'arXiv preprint arXiv:','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5294,'Empirical Software Engineering','journal',2014,NULL),(5295,'Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering','proceedings',2011,23),(5296,'Engineering and Managing Software Requirements','Book',2005,23),(5297,'Engineering and Managing Software Requirements','bookChapter',2005,NULL),(5298,'Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence','journal',2001,21),(5299,'Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence','journal',2005,24),(5300,'Enterprise Information Systems','journal',2011,22),(5301,'Expert Systems with Applications','journal',2009,21),(5302,'Feature Interactions in Software and Communication Systems X','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5303,'Requirements Engineering Visualization, REV International Workshop on','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5304,'Formal aspects of computing','proceedings',2010,23),(5305,'Formal Methods in System Design','proceedings',2007,23),(5306,'Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, CERE International Workshop on','proceedings',2006,22),(5307,'Frameworks for Developing Efficient Information Systems: Models, Theory, and Practice: Models, Theory, and Practice','bookChapter',2013,NULL),(5308,'conference on KnowledgeBased Software Engineering: Joint Conference on KnowledgeBased Software Engineering','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5309,'JCKBSE','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5310,'Green in Software Engineering','bookChapter',2015,NULL),(5311,'IASTED International MultiConference on Applied Informatics','proceedings',2003,NULL),(5312,'ICK KDIR International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval and KMIS International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing, Proc','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5313,'Audio Language and Image Processing (ICALIP), International Conference on','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5314,'ICCIT of International Conference on Computer and Information Technology','proceedings',2009,22),(5315,'ICEIS International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems','proceedings',2003,NULL),(5316,'ICEIS International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5317,'ICEIS International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5318,'ICIS Thirtieth International Conference on Information Systems','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5319,'ICISA International Conference on Information Science and Applications','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5320,'ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Adaptive and SelfManaging Systems','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5321,'ICSOFT','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5322,'ICSOFT','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5323,'ICSOFT ','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5324,'ICSOFT','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5325,'ICTS','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5326,'Web Services (ICWS), IEEE international conference on','proceedings',2010,21),(5327,'IEE Software','journal',2006,NULL),(5328,'Neural Networks, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',1994,NULL),(5329,'Software Maintenance, ICSM IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2008,22),(5330,'Latin America Transactions, IEEE (Revista IEEE America Latina)','journal',2015,NULL),(5331,'IEEE Latin America Transactions','proceedings',2005,21),(5332,'IEEE Pacific RIM Conference on Communications, Computers, and Signal Processing','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5333,'IEEE Software','journal',2001,22),(5334,'IEEE Software','journal',2005,21),(5335,'Network Operations and Management Symposium, NOMS IEEE/IFIP','proceedings',2006,NULL),(5336,'Computers, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2014,NULL),(5337,'Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2008,22),(5338,'Services Computing, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2015,NULL),(5339,'Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on','journal',1998,22),(5340,'Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2000,22),(5341,'Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2008,21),(5342,'Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2013,22),(5343,'Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2014,NULL),(5344,'Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on','journal',2006,22),(5345,'Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on','proceedings',2009,22),(5346,'IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems','journal',2006,40),(5347,'IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems','journal',2008,NULL),(5348,'IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems','journal',2013,NULL),(5349,'IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems','proceedings',2004,21),(5350,'IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems','proceedings',2006,NULL),(5351,'IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5352,'Software, IET','journal',2010,NULL),(5353,'Software, IET','journal',2012,NULL),(5354,'IJCAI','proceedings',1997,NULL),(5355,'Informatik Forschung und Entwicklung','journal',2007,NULL),(5356,'InformatikSpektrum','journal',2008,NULL),(5357,'Information and Software Technology','journal',1993,NULL),(5358,'Information and software technology','journal',2006,24),(5359,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2008,24),(5360,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2010,21),(5361,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2011,24),(5362,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2013,24),(5363,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2014,24),(5364,'Information and Software Technology','journal',2015,NULL),(5365,'Information and Software Technology','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5366,'Information Systems','journal',1987,21),(5367,'Information Systems','journal',1999,24),(5368,'Information Systems','journal',2014,NULL),(5369,'Information Systems','journal',2015,NULL),(5370,'Information systems','proceedings',2004,21),(5371,'Information Systems','proceedings',2012,21),(5372,'Information Systems and eBusiness Management','journal',2009,23),(5373,'INFORSID : XXIIIeme Congres Informatique des Organisations et Systemes d Information et de Decision','proceedings',2005,NULL),(5374,'Ingenierie des Systemes d Information','journal',2012,NULL),(5375,'Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering','journal',2010,23),(5376,'Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering','Article in Press',2015,NULL),(5377,'Intelligent service robotics','journal',2008,21),(5378,'Intentional Perspectives on Information Systems Engineering','Book',2010,23),(5379,'Intentional Perspectives on Information Systems Engineering','bookChapter',2010,NULL),(5380,'Interacting with computers','journal',1998,24),(5381,'Int Arab J Inf Technol','journal',2015,NULL),(5382,'Computer Applications Technology (ICCAT), International Conference on','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5383,'Journal of Mobile Multimedia','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5384,'SelfAdaptive and SelfOrganizing Systems (SASO), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5385,'International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology','journal',2012,NULL),(5386,'International Journal of AgentOriented Software Engineering','journal',2008,24),(5387,'International Journal of AgentOriented Software Engineering','journal',2009,21),(5388,'International Journal of Human Computer Studies','journal',1999,21),(5389,'Journal of Information Processing and Management','journal',2011,21),(5390,'International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD)','journal',2010,29),(5391,'Frameworks for Developing Efficient Information Systems: Models, Theory, and Practice: Models, Theory, and Practice','journal',2011,39),(5392,'International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD)','journal',2012,NULL),(5393,'International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD)','journal',2015,NULL),(5394,'International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD)','journal',2011,21),(5395,'International Journal of Information Technology \\& Decision Making','journal',2006,21),(5396,'International Journal of Information Technology and Management','journal',2009,21),(5397,'International Journal of Intelligent Systems','journal',2010,28),(5398,'International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications','journal',2012,38),(5399,'International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications','journal',2013,NULL),(5400,'International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications','journal',2014,NULL),(5401,'International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications','journal',2015,NULL),(5402,'International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering','journal',2013,NULL),(5403,'International Journal of Web Information Systems','journal',2011,38),(5404,'International Journal of Web Services Research','journal',2005,21),(5405,'Inverse Problems','journal',2014,21),(5406,'Recent Trends in Information, Telecommunication and Computing (ITC), International Conference on','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5407,'ITNG International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5408,'International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution and the annual ERCIM Workshop on Software Evolution','proceedings',2011,21),(5409,'Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition)','journal',2009,21),(5410,'Computer Research and Development','journal',2013,21),(5411,'Journal of Computational Information Systems','journal',2009,NULL),(5412,'Journal of Computational Information Systems','journal',2010,NULL),(5413,'Journal of Computational Information Systems','journal',2012,NULL),(5414,'International journal of adaptive control and signal processing','journal',1995,NULL),(5415,'Journal of Computer Information Systems','journal',2006,32),(5416,'Journal of Computer Information Systems','journal',2011,24),(5417,'Journal of Database Management (JDM)','journal',2011,21),(5418,'Journal of Database Management (JDM)','journal',2013,29),(5419,'Journal of Grid Computing','Article in Press',2015,NULL),(5420,'Journal of information processing','journal',2014,NULL),(5421,'Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems','journal',2002,27),(5422,'Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications','journal',2004,21),(5423,'Journal of Management Information Systems','journal',1992,21),(5424,'re','journal',2002,21),(5425,'Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology','journal',2004,35),(5426,'Journal of Software','journal',2011,37),(5427,'The Journal of Strategic Information Systems','journal',2011,24),(5428,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2006,24),(5429,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2007,24),(5430,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2012,24),(5431,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2013,24),(5432,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2014,21),(5433,'Journal of Systems and Software','journal',2015,NULL),(5434,'Journal of Systems and Software','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5435,'The Journal of Technology Transfer','journal',2007,21),(5436,'Journal of Theoretical \\& Applied Information Technology','journal',2014,NULL),(5437,'J UCS','journal',2010,23),(5438,'J UCS','journal',2012,30),(5439,'Journal of Visual Languages \\& Computing','journal',2006,24),(5440,'KMIS International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing,','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5441,'Kybernetes','journal',2011,21),(5442,'Engineering Societies in the Agents World III','proceedings',2003,NULL),(5443,'ProMAS','proceedings',2005,23),(5444,'Enterprise Information Systems','proceedings',2009,23),(5445,'The Practice of Enterprise Modeling','proceedings',2010,23),(5446,'Information Systems Evolution','proceedings',2011,21),(5447,'Business Modeling and Software Design','proceedings',2012,21),(5448,'Enterprise, BusinessProcess and Information Systems Modeling','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5449,'The Practice of Enterprise Modeling','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5450,'Enterprise, BusinessProcess and Information Systems Modeling','proceedings',2015,NULL),(5451,'Computational Science and Its ApplicationsICCSA','proceedings',2005,22),(5452,'Journal on Data Semantics I','journal',2003,23),(5453,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','journal',2004,23),(5454,'Secure and Trustworthy Service Composition','journal',2014,NULL),(5455,'Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)','journal',2015,23),(5456,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','proceedings',1995,21),(5457,'Requirements Targeting Software and Systems Engineering','proceedings',1998,NULL),(5458,'Logic for Programming and Automated Reasoning','proceedings',1999,21),(5459,'Reliable SoftwareTechnologies Europe','proceedings',2001,NULL),(5460,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','proceedings',2002,NULL),(5461,'KnowledgeBased Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems','proceedings',2005,21),(5462,'Interactive Systems Design, Specification, and Verification','proceedings',2006,23),(5463,'On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems : OTM Workshops','proceedings',2007,23),(5464,'AgentOriented Software Engineering VIII','proceedings',2008,23),(5465,'Conceptual ModelingER','proceedings',2009,23),(5466,'Abstract State Machines, Alloy, B and Z','proceedings',2010,21),(5467,'Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality','proceedings',2011,23),(5468,'Models in Software Engineering','proceedings',2012,23),(5469,'Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality','proceedings',2013,23),(5470,'Conceptual Modeling','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5471,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','proceedings',2015,NULL),(5472,'Memorias de la Conferencia Iberoamericana de Software Engineering CIbSE','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5473,'International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5474,'NonFunctional Properties in Service Oriented Architecture: Requirements, Models and Methods','bookChapter',2011,NULL),(5475,'NTT Technical Review','journal',2008,NULL),(5476,'PACIS','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5477,'ACM international workshop on Empirical assessment of software engineering languages and technologies: held in conjunction with the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5478,'Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5479,'Procedia Computer Science','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5480,'Procedia Computer Science','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5481,'SignalImage Technology and InternetBased Systems (SITIS), International Conference on','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5482,'Computational Science and Engineering, CSE International Conference on','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5483,'Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC IEEE International','proceedings',2009,22),(5484,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2007,22),(5485,'Formal Methods and Models for CoDesign, MEMOCODE ACM and IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2003,NULL),(5486,'Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE), International Workshop on','proceedings',2011,21),(5487,'Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5488,'IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT','proceedings',2009,22),(5489,'Services Computing Conference (APSCC), IEEE AsiaPacific','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5490,'IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, ICECCS','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5491,'SocioTechnical Aspects in Security and Trust (STAST), Workshop on','proceedings',2011,21),(5492,'Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VSGAMES), International Conference on','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5493,'Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), International Conference on the','proceedings',2012,21),(5494,'Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS), IEEE International Conference and Workshops on','proceedings',2012,22),(5495,'Services Computing (SCC), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2012,22),(5496,'Computer and Information Science (ICIS), IEEE/ACIS International Conference on','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5497,'Software Engineering (SBES), Brazilian Symposium on','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5498,'Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBSEERC), Eastern European Regional Conference on the','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5499,'Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), International Conference on the','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5500,'Services Computing (SCC), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5501,'Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, SBES','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5502,'SelfAdaptive and SelfOrganizing Systems (SASO), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2008,22),(5503,'Dependability (DEPEND), International Conference on','proceedings',2010,21),(5504,'Grid and Pervasive Computing Workshops, GPC Workshops The International Conference on','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5505,'Software Components, Architectures and Reuse (SBCARS), Brazilian Symposium on','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5506,'Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering (TASE), International Symposium on','proceedings',2011,22),(5507,'Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), International Conference on the','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5508,'Web Services (ECOWS), IEEE European Conference on','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5509,'Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5510,'Software Engineering Conference, APSEC AsiaPacific','proceedings',2008,22),(5511,'Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), AsiaPacific','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5512,'Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS), IEEE International Conference and Workshops on','proceedings',2008,21),(5513,'Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA), ACIS International Conference on','proceedings',2006,21),(5514,'Sharing and Reusing Architectural KnowledgeArchitecture, Rationale, and Design Intent, SHARK/ADI: ICSE Workshops Workshop on','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5515,'Services Computing (SCC), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5516,'Web Services (ICWS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5517,'Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5518,'Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), IEEE International','proceedings',2010,21),(5519,'IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, EDOC','proceedings',2011,22),(5520,'Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC IEEE International','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5521,'International Computer Software and Applications Conference','proceedings',2005,NULL),(5522,'Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC Annual International','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5523,'Computer Software and Applications, COMPSAC Annual IEEE International','proceedings',2008,22),(5524,'International Computer Software and Applications Conference','proceedings',2009,22),(5525,'Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW), IEEE Annual','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5526,'Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), IEEE Annual','proceedings',2011,21),(5527,'Computer Science and Software Engineering, International Conference on','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5528,'International Conference on Data Engineering','proceedings',1994,21),(5529,'Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5530,'International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5531,'Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5532,'Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5533,'Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2015,NULL),(5534,'International Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2002,25),(5535,'International Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2003,21),(5536,'International Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2004,21),(5537,'international workshop on Scenarios and state machines: models, algorithms, and tools','proceedings',2006,21),(5538,'international workshop on Software engineering for adaptive and selfmanaging systems','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5539,'International Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2009,25),(5540,'ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Adaptive and SelfManaging Systems','proceedings',2010,21),(5541,'International Conference on Software and Systems Process','proceedings',2011,25),(5542,'International Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2012,25),(5543,'Data and Software Engineering (ICODSE), International Conference on','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5544,'ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies','proceedings',2003,25),(5545,'Computer Games (CGAMES), International Conference on','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5546,'the IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications (SEA )','proceedings',2006,31),(5547,'international conference on Aspectoriented software development companion','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5548,'WER','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5549,'Dependable Computing, PRDC IEEE Pacific Rim International Symposium on','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5550,'Advanced Computing and Communications, ADCOM International Conference on','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5551,'workshop on Early aspects','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5552,'International Requirements Engineering, RE IEEE','proceedings',2008,21),(5553,'conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research','proceedings',2006,25),(5554,'Information Reuse and Integration, IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2006,22),(5555,'International Conference on Information Quality, ICIQ','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5556,'Spring simulation multiconference','proceedings',2008,25),(5557,'Web Mining and Webbased Application, WMWA PacificAsia Conference on','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5558,'Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5559,'ICSE Workshop on AspectOriented Requirements Engineering and Architecture Design','proceedings',2009,21),(5560,'Software Engineering for Adaptive and SelfManaging Systems, SEAMS ICSE Workshop on','proceedings',2009,22),(5561,'Software Engineering in Health Care, SEHC ICSE Workshop on','proceedings',2009,21),(5562,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2010,22),(5563,'Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), International Conference on','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5564,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2011,22),(5565,'Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops \\& PhD Forum (IPDPSW), IEEE International','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5566,'Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), International Conference on','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5567,'CLEI','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5568,'Advance Computing Conference (IACC), IEEE International','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5569,'Autonomy Requirements Engineering for Space Missions','proceedings',2013,22),(5570,'SEKE','proceedings',2009,21),(5571,'Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS)','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5572,'International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science RCIS','proceedings',2008,22),(5573,'International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5574,'International Workshop on Architectures, Concepts and Technologies for Service Oriented Computing, ACTSOC , in Conjunction withICSOFT','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5575,'IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, SEA','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5576,'IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI ), California, USA','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5577,'Workshop on Models@ run time','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5578,'International Workshop on Modelling, Simulation, Verification and Validation of Enterprise Information Systems, MSVVEIS , in Conjunction with ICEIS','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5579,'Joint Conference on KnowledgeBased Software Engineering, JCKBSE','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5580,'ACM Workshop on Quality of Protection','proceedings',2008,21),(5581,'ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5582,'ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of software engineering','proceedings',2002,25),(5583,'ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes','proceedings',2004,25),(5584,'ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering','proceedings',2006,25),(5585,'ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of software engineering','proceedings',2008,21),(5586,'ACM symposium on Applied computing','proceedings',2005,25),(5587,'ACM symposium on Applied computing','proceedings',2008,25),(5588,'ACM symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5589,'ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2010,25),(5590,'ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2011,25),(5591,'Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5592,'Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5593,'Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2014,25),(5594,'Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5595,'Software Engineering, ASWEC Australian Conference on','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5596,'Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC), Australian','proceedings',2010,22),(5597,'European Conference on eGovernment, Haagse Hogeschool, Den Haag, The Netherlands','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5598,'IADIS International Conference eLearning','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5599,'TPMC','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5600,'IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering, SE','proceedings',2008,NULL),(5601,'IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering: part of the IASTED International MultiConference on Applied Informatics, SE','proceedings',2005,NULL),(5602,'Requirements Engineering, IEEE International Symposium on','journal',1999,22),(5603,'Requirements Engineering, IEEE International Symposium on','proceedings',1997,22),(5604,'Requirements Engineering, IEEE International Symposium on','proceedings',2001,22),(5605,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2002,22),(5606,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2003,22),(5607,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2004,22),(5608,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2005,22),(5609,'RE','proceedings',2006,22),(5610,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2009,22),(5611,'Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5612,'IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics','proceedings',1989,NULL),(5613,'Visualization','proceedings',1997,22),(5614,'International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5615,'International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5616,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5617,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2014,NULL),(5618,'of The International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent SystemsVolume','proceedings',2009,NULL),(5619,'International Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems','proceedings',2006,NULL),(5620,'Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS), IEEE International Conference and Workshops on','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5621,'ISCA International Conference on Computer Applications in Industry and Engineering, CAINE','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5622,'Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), IEEE International Workshop on','proceedings',2012,22),(5623,'Production Planning \\& Control','proceedings',2011,21),(5624,'REFSQ International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, In Conjunction with CAiSE','proceedings',2006,NULL),(5625,'Relating System Quality and Software Architecture','bookChapter',2014,21),(5626,'Requirements Engineering','journal',1996,21),(5627,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2009,23),(5628,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2010,21),(5629,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2011,23),(5630,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2012,23),(5631,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2013,23),(5632,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2014,21),(5633,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2015,NULL),(5634,'Requirements Engineering','Article in Press',2014,NULL),(5635,'Requirements Engineering','Article in Press',2015,NULL),(5636,'Journal of Software','journal',2010,21),(5637,'Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software','journal',2011,21),(5638,'SAGAware International Workshop on Situation Activity and Goal Awareness','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5639,'Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience','journal',2014,NULL),(5640,'Science China Information Sciences','journal',2014,NULL),(5641,'Science of Computer Programming','proceedings',2015,NULL),(5642,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2006,NULL),(5643,'Service Oriented Computing and Applications','journal',2013,NULL),(5644,'SIGMOD Record','proceedings',2006,NULL),(5645,'Situational Awareness in Computer Network Defense: Principles, Methods and Applications: Principles, Methods and Applications','bookChapter',2012,NULL),(5646,'SMARTGREENS International Conference on Smart Grids and Green IT Systems','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5647,'Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), ACIS International Conference on','proceedings',2013,NULL),(5648,'Software \\& Systems Modeling','Article in Press',2014,NULL),(5649,'Software \\& Systems Modeling','journal',2005,23),(5650,'Software \\& Systems Modeling','journal',2014,NULL),(5651,'Software \\& Systems Modeling','Article in Press',2015,NULL),(5652,'Situational Awareness in Computer Network Defense: Principles, Methods and Applications: Principles, Methods and Applications','bookChapter',2013,NULL),(5653,'Software Process Improvement and Practice','journal',2006,28),(5654,'Software Quality Journal','journal',2012,23),(5655,'Software Quality Journal','Article in Press',2015,NULL),(5656,'Software Reuse in the Emerging Cloud Computing Era','bookChapter',2012,NULL),(5657,'SPCA : International Symposium on Pervasive Computing and Applications,','proceedings',2007,NULL),(5658,'Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications','journal',2010,NULL),(5659,'Studies in Computational Intelligence','proceedings',2011,NULL),(5660,'Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA), ACIS International Conference on','proceedings',2012,NULL),(5661,'The Art and Science of Analyzing Software Data','bookChapter',2015,NULL),(5662,'Virtual and Physical Prototyping','Article in Press',2015,NULL),(5663,'Virtual Organizations: Systems and Practices','bookChapter',2005,NULL),(5664,'Virtual Reality','journal',2000,21),(5665,'of The World Congress on Engineering','proceedings',2010,NULL),(5666,'VIII Workshop in Requirements Engineering','proceedings',2005,NULL),(5667,'Simulation Conference Winter','proceedings',1995,NULL),(5668,'WMSCI The World MultiConference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics,','proceedings',2005,NULL),(5669,'Journal of System Simulation','journal',2008,NULL),(5670,'Journal of System Simulation','journal',2009,NULL),(5671,'Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice','journal',2013,NULL),(5672,'INFORSID','proceedings',2010,21),(5673,'ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb','journal',2007,NULL),(5674,'Requirements Engineering','journal',2010,21),(5675,'Requirements engineering','journal',2013,21),(5676,'ComponentBased Software Quality','bookChapter',2003,23),(5677,'Transactions on aspect-oriented software development ','journal',2010,23),(5678,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2005,21),(5679,'Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC IEEE International','proceedings',2011,22),(5680,'Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC Annual International','proceedings',2005,22),(5681,'','',0,21),(5682,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','proceedings',2003,23),(5683,'SERA','proceedings',2004,23),(5684,'Advanced Information Systems Engineering','proceedings',2002,23),(5685,'Reuse of OfftheShelf Components','proceedings',2006,23),(5686,'IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering','proceedings',2009,22),(5687,'Conceptual ModelingER','proceedings',2010,23),(5688,'Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering','proceedings',2004,23),(5689,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2012,22),(5690,'Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2011,22),(5691,'Software Engineering for Collective Autonomic Systems','bookChapter',2015,23),(5692,'Software Engineering Conference, APSEC AsiaPacific','proceedings',2008,22),(5693,'International Conference on Business Process Management','proceedings',2007,23),(5694,'Journal of Visual Languages & Computing','journal',2006,24),(5695,'Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC Annual International','proceedings',2008,22),(5696,'Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC IEEE International','proceedings',2009,22),(5697,'Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2011,22),(5698,'SelfAdaptive and SelfOrganizing Systems (SASO), IEEE International Conference on','proceedings',2008,22),(5699,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2008,21),(5700,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2007,22),(5701,'Transactions on aspect-oriented software development','bookChapter',2007,23),(5702,'Software Engineering in Health Care, SEHC ICSE Workshop on','proceedings',2009,21),(5703,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2007,22),(5704,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2004,22),(5705,'On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems : OTM Workshops','proceedings',2007,23),(5706,'IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering','proceedings',2011,22),(5707,'International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications','proceedings',2010,22),(5708,'ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2010,25),(5709,'IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference','proceedings',2011,22),(5710,'International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality','proceedings',2010,21),(5711,'IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference','proceedings',2004,22),(5712,'IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference','proceedings',2009,22),(5713,'The Practice of Enterprise Modeling','proceedings',2009,23),(5714,'Software Engineering for Adaptive and SelfManaging Systems, SEAMS ICSE Workshop on','proceedings',2009,22),(5715,'IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference','proceedings',2012,22),(5716,'International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications','proceedings',2004,23),(5717,'ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2008,25),(5718,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2009,22),(5719,'Conceptual Modeling (ER)','proceedings',2010,23),(5720,'ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of software engineering','proceedings',2002,25),(5721,'International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE','proceedings',2002,25),(5722,'Conceptual Modeling','proceedings',2009,23),(5723,'ACM Symposium on Applied Computing','proceedings',2011,25),(5724,'Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEEE International','proceedings',2007,22),(5725,'International Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering','journal',2006,36),(5726,'Advances in Conceptual Modeling–Foundations and Applications','proceedings',2007,23),(5727,'Software & Systems Modeling','journal',2005,23),(5728,'Production Planning & Control','proceedings',2011,21),(5729,'International Conference on Software Engineering','proceedings',2006,21),(5730,'Computer Standards & Interfaces','proceedings',2011,21),(5731,'Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, IEEE International','proceedings',2009,22),(5732,'Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications','bookChapter',2009,23),(5733,'Journal of Universal Computer Science','journal',2012,30),(5734,'International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making','journal',2006,21);

--
-- Dumping events for database 'GOLSurvey'
--

--
-- Dumping routines for database 'GOLSurvey'
--

--
-- Final view structure for view `IRC_referencesAllIncluded`
--

/*!50001 DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `IRC_referencesAllIncluded`*/;
/*!50001 DROP VIEW IF EXISTS `IRC_referencesAllIncluded`*/;
/*!50001 CREATE ALGORITHM=UNDEFINED */
/*!50013 DEFINER=`salnitri`@`localhost` SQL SECURITY DEFINER */
/*!50001 VIEW `IRC_referencesAllIncluded` AS select `mattiaRef`.`IRC_paper_id` AS `IRC_paper_id`,`mattiaRef`.`reference` AS `reference` from (((((`IRC_references` `mattiaRef` join `IRC_references` `jenRef` on(((`jenRef`.`IRC_paper_id` = `mattiaRef`.`IRC_paper_id`) and (`jenRef`.`reference` = `mattiaRef`.`reference`) and (`jenRef`.`tags` <> '') and (`mattiaRef`.`tags` <> '') and (`jenRef`.`reviewer_id` = 2) and (`mattiaRef`.`reviewer_id` = 1)))) join `IRC_references` `tongRef` on(((`jenRef`.`IRC_paper_id` = `tongRef`.`IRC_paper_id`) and (`jenRef`.`reference` = `tongRef`.`reference`) and (`tongRef`.`tags` <> '') and (`tongRef`.`reviewer_id` = 3)))) join `IRC_references` `evellinRef` on(((`jenRef`.`IRC_paper_id` = `evellinRef`.`IRC_paper_id`) and (`jenRef`.`reference` = `evellinRef`.`reference`) and (`evellinRef`.`tags` <> '') and (`evellinRef`.`reviewer_id` = 4)))) join `IRC_references` `aleRef` on(((`jenRef`.`IRC_paper_id` = `aleRef`.`IRC_paper_id`) and (`jenRef`.`reference` = `aleRef`.`reference`) and (`aleRef`.`tags` <> '') and (`aleRef`.`reviewer_id` = 8)))) join `IRC_references` `basakRef` on(((`jenRef`.`IRC_paper_id` = `basakRef`.`IRC_paper_id`) and (`jenRef`.`reference` = `basakRef`.`reference`) and (`basakRef`.`tags` <> '') and (`basakRef`.`reviewer_id` = 12)))) */;


CREATE DATABASE  IF NOT EXISTS `goalmappingsurvey` /*!40100 DEFAULT CHARACTER SET latin1 */;
USE `goalmappingsurvey`;
--
-- Host: localhost    Database: goalmappingsurvey
-- ------------------------------------------------------


--
-- Table structure for table `authorgroup_has_authors`
--

CREATE TABLE `authorgroup_has_authors` (
  `AuthorGroup_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `Author_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`AuthorGroup_ID`,`Author_ID`),
  KEY `fk_authorgroup_has_authors_authorgroups1_idx` (`AuthorGroup_ID`),
  KEY `fk_authorgroup_has_authors_authors1_idx` (`Author_ID`),
  CONSTRAINT `fk_authorgroup_has_authors_authorgroups1` FOREIGN KEY (`AuthorGroup_ID`) REFERENCES `authorgroups` (`AuthorGroup_ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
  CONSTRAINT `fk_authorgroup_has_authors_authors1` FOREIGN KEY (`Author_ID`) REFERENCES `authors` (`Authors_ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `authorgroup_has_authors`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `authorgroups`
--

CREATE TABLE `authorgroups` (
  `AuthorGroup_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`AuthorGroup_ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `authorgroups`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `authors`
--

CREATE TABLE `authors` (
  `Authors_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `Authors_author` varchar(200) DEFAULT NULL,
  `Authors_institution` varchar(200) DEFAULT NULL,
  `Authors_state` varchar(45) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`Authors_ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `authors`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `classifications`
--

CREATE TABLE `classifications` (
  `idclassifications` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `classificationdesc` varchar(45) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`idclassifications`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `classifications`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `framework`
--

CREATE TABLE `framework` (
  `Framework_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `Framework_framework` varchar(200) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`Framework_ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `framework`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `paper_covers_topics`
--

CREATE TABLE `paper_covers_topics` (
  `idpaper` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `idtopic` int(11) NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`idpaper`,`idtopic`),
  KEY `idtopic_idx` (`idtopic`),
  CONSTRAINT `idpaper` FOREIGN KEY (`idpaper`) REFERENCES `papermetadata` (`PaperMetadata_ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
  CONSTRAINT `idtopic` FOREIGN KEY (`idtopic`) REFERENCES `topics` (`idtopics`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `paper_covers_topics`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `paper_is_classified`
--

CREATE TABLE `paper_is_classified` (
  `idpaperclassified` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `idclassification` int(11) NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`idpaperclassified`,`idclassification`),
  KEY `idclassificationfk_idx` (`idclassification`),
  CONSTRAINT `idclassificationfk` FOREIGN KEY (`idclassification`) REFERENCES `classifications` (`idclassifications`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
  CONSTRAINT `idpaperfk` FOREIGN KEY (`idpaperclassified`) REFERENCES `papermetadata` (`PaperMetadata_ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `paper_is_classified`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `papermetadata`
--

CREATE TABLE `papermetadata` (
  `PaperMetadata_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `PaperMetadata_paper` varchar(200) DEFAULT NULL,
  `PaperMetadata_SurveyID` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`PaperMetadata_ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `papermetadata`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `publication`
--

CREATE TABLE `publication` (
  `CitationsGoogle` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `CitationsScopus` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `CitationsWoS` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `PaperMetadata` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `Venue` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `Framework` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `Year` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `AuthorGroup` int(11) NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`PaperMetadata`,`Venue`,`Framework`,`Year`,`AuthorGroup`),
  KEY `FK_Venue` (`Venue`),
  KEY `FK_Framework` (`Framework`),
  KEY `FK_Year` (`Year`),
  KEY `fk_publication_author_groups1_idx` (`AuthorGroup`),
  CONSTRAINT `FK_Framework` FOREIGN KEY (`Framework`) REFERENCES `framework` (`Framework_ID`),
  CONSTRAINT `FK_PaperMetadata` FOREIGN KEY (`PaperMetadata`) REFERENCES `papermetadata` (`PaperMetadata_ID`),
  CONSTRAINT `fk_publication_author_groups1` FOREIGN KEY (`AuthorGroup`) REFERENCES `authorgroups` (`AuthorGroup_ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
  CONSTRAINT `FK_Venue` FOREIGN KEY (`Venue`) REFERENCES `venue` (`Venue_ID`),
  CONSTRAINT `FK_Year` FOREIGN KEY (`Year`) REFERENCES `year` (`Year_ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `publication`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `references`
--

CREATE TABLE `references` (
  `papermetadata_PaperMetadata_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `papermetadata_Referenced_PaperMetadata_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `ReferenceType_idReferenceType` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `dummy` double DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`papermetadata_PaperMetadata_ID`,`papermetadata_Referenced_PaperMetadata_ID`,`ReferenceType_idReferenceType`),
  KEY `fk_References_papermetadata1_idx` (`papermetadata_PaperMetadata_ID`),
  KEY `fk_References_papermetadata2_idx` (`papermetadata_Referenced_PaperMetadata_ID`),
  KEY `fk_References_ReferenceType1_idx` (`ReferenceType_idReferenceType`),
  CONSTRAINT `fk_References_papermetadata1` FOREIGN KEY (`papermetadata_PaperMetadata_ID`) REFERENCES `papermetadata` (`PaperMetadata_ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
  CONSTRAINT `fk_References_papermetadata2` FOREIGN KEY (`papermetadata_Referenced_PaperMetadata_ID`) REFERENCES `papermetadata` (`PaperMetadata_ID`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
  CONSTRAINT `fk_References_ReferenceType1` FOREIGN KEY (`ReferenceType_idReferenceType`) REFERENCES `referencetype` (`idReferenceType`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `references`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `referencetype`
--

CREATE TABLE `referencetype` (
  `idReferenceType` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `ReferenceTypeDesc` varchar(45) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`idReferenceType`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `referencetype`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `topics`
--

CREATE TABLE `topics` (
  `idtopics` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `topicdesc` varchar(45) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`idtopics`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `topics`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `venue`
--

CREATE TABLE `venue` (
  `Venue_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `Venue_venue` varchar(200) DEFAULT NULL,
  `Type_type` varchar(200) DEFAULT NULL,
  `Publisher_publisher` varchar(200) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`Venue_ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `venue`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `year`
--

CREATE TABLE `year` (
  `Year_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `Year_year` varchar(200) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`Year_ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `year`
--


--
-- Dumping events for database 'goalmappingsurvey'
--

--
-- Dumping routines for database 'goalmappingsurvey'
--


